• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

498RWHP @ just over 8.5 PSI LOL *graph*

  • Thread starter Thread starter hotmustang331
  • Start date Start date Sep 17, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
Sep 17, 2007
#21
  • Sep 17, 2007
  • #21
by 2 freakin HP damn..... hotmustang i have been here seeing your car go form cams to single turbo and now TT.....and i must say your car is one that i admire
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
39
Clovis, CA
Sep 17, 2007
#22
  • Sep 17, 2007
  • #22
damn it does need a retune lol.....12.5 afr + 500whp on stock block= BOOM
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Sep 17, 2007
#23
  • Sep 17, 2007
  • #23
^How do you like the pro racer stuff? Can you compensate for different injectors/MAF, ect?

Thanks guys
 

TweekedGT

New Member
Jul 22, 2004
1,274
0
0
Alberta
Sep 17, 2007
#24
  • Sep 17, 2007
  • #24
Dynoqueen .....er I mean Dynojet J/K . Awesome numbers.
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Sep 17, 2007
#25
  • Sep 17, 2007
  • #25
03ghoststang said:
by 2 freakin HP damn..... hotmustang i have been here seeing your car go form cams to single turbo and now TT.....and i must say your car is one that i admire
Click to expand...

Thanks

Single turbo I dont even remember that setup

57s are going to my dad

I agree Thomas and nope same one.

Dyno queen eh? Hey thats not so bad but I prefer dyno king
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
39
Clovis, CA
Sep 18, 2007
#26
  • Sep 18, 2007
  • #26
hotmustang331 said:
^How do you like the pro racer stuff? Can you compensate for different injectors/MAF, ect?

Thanks guys
Click to expand...

The pro racer is worth every penny. Very easy to use yourself. You can compensate for different injectors/MAF. Best part is, you can tune anytime you want. Winter means different air density, which means different AFR. Unlike the dyno, your car is TRULY tuned with weather conditions in mind. Dyno tunes can't provide wind or real life conditions that will affect the tune. Best $400 I have spent.
 

jivepepper

Founding Member
Jun 19, 2002
776
5
18
58
Under a Sombrero. in WV.
www.cardomain.com
Sep 18, 2007
#27
  • Sep 18, 2007
  • #27
Nice.
 

mogs01gt

Founding Member
Jul 22, 2002
3,113
30
119
45
Ohio
Sep 18, 2007
#28
  • Sep 18, 2007
  • #28
thomas91169 said:
its the PSI these motors cannot handle. with larger turbo's, you move more air at lower boost levels than smaller ones. this is why properly choosing turbos based on goals/setups is key, as in the above. with a mere 8psi hes making close to 500whp. i know for a fact most guys run 11-12psi on intercooled vortech or procharger setups and make barely 450 to the wheels while at that level, running their motors on borrowed time.

IMO even at 10psi with a great tune, youll still put down 100whp more than any centrifugal guy and put less strain on the rotating assembly.

Good Job! keep up the modding! are you going to try a different dyno next time?
Click to expand...

You are comparing a TT setup to a single blower setup. That isnt a very fair comparison. There is a reason why TT setups have to run in the dual power adder class.

Great numbers!!!!
 

hobbes80

Founding Member
Jun 29, 2002
410
0
17
45
Northern Virginia
www.hobbesvilla.com
Sep 18, 2007
#29
  • Sep 18, 2007
  • #29
Those numbers are amazing... I think I now know my next setup.

of course... I'll have to follow it up with beefing my poor little 8.8" rear.
 

billfisher

Active Member
Jul 17, 2005
1,296
4
38
huntsville, AL
Sep 18, 2007
#30
  • Sep 18, 2007
  • #30
i agree with the above. i haven't heaard of blowing it up with low boost, but i have seen too many blow at 12psi around here.
 

ADRENLN

Active Member
Apr 16, 2003
2,342
3
49
NJ
Sep 18, 2007
#31
  • Sep 18, 2007
  • #31
SOUNDS AWSOME MAN, congrats! you are making the same power at low psi as i will make with 15 psi and the blower. really proves turbos effectiveness. good luck with it. how does the car feel? is it just sick to drive on the road or what?
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Sep 18, 2007
#32
  • Sep 18, 2007
  • #32
Thanks guys! And glad to hear 98stang, im going to do it as well! Could you verify that I can compensate for 62# injectors for me? I know it will do 60 but want to make sure 62s are supported. Thanks

^ Car feels crazy LOL. I love how the car just keeps pulling and pulling...the further you pull it the more power you get. Your going to LOVE 500RWHP thats for sure....although i PERSONALLY think your going to put down around 550 @ 15PSI
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
Sep 18, 2007
#33
  • Sep 18, 2007
  • #33
hotmustang331 said:
Thanks

Single turbo I dont even remember that setup

57s are going to my dad

I agree Thomas and nope same one.

Dyno queen eh? Hey thats not so bad but I prefer dyno king
Click to expand...

ooops my bad i was talking to a friend on IM he has a single turbo setup and wants to do a TT just mixed up the reply with conversation......it was a TT with 57's
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Sep 18, 2007
#34
  • Sep 18, 2007
  • #34
No worries
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
39
Clovis, CA
Sep 18, 2007
#35
  • Sep 18, 2007
  • #35
hotmustang331 said:
Thanks guys! And glad to hear 98stang, im going to do it as well! Could you verify that I can compensate for 62# injectors for me? I know it will do 60 but want to make sure 62s are supported. Thanks

^ Car feels crazy LOL. I love how the car just keeps pulling and pulling...the further you pull it the more power you get. Your going to LOVE 500RWHP thats for sure....although i PERSONALLY think your going to put down around 550 @ 15PSI
Click to expand...

Ya the highest I could find was 60 ...u can contact SCT and I'm sure u will get a 62lb file
 

03ghoststang

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2005
1,930
1
57
Los Angeles, California
Sep 18, 2007
#36
  • Sep 18, 2007
  • #36
So once you hit your mark.... if and when you do get a built block what Compression Ratio are you considering? if you decide to up the boost
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Sep 18, 2007
#37
  • Sep 18, 2007
  • #37
Thanks 98stang I really appreciate the help . And yep im sure they can help me out...heck even 60s would be VERY close to 62s, so it may work anyways. Ill just tune it to the A/F I want.


03ghost
Well I think im going to go with a 9.0-1 compression. You can be sure im always scheming on ways to get the most power I can and thats whats behind it LOL. 9.0-1 will give almost the same N/A power as I have now, then add in heads, new engine, stroker, and it will make even more N/A. The extra compression will also help with spoolup vs 8.5-1, along with gas milage. And since I want to be running 17-18PSI on pump, 9.0-1 can do that.
8.5 can go 20PSI but I wouldnt use it anyways...just take longer to spoolup (8.5-1 compression + the fact ill need to hit 20PSI) for roughly the same power.

then on race gas it doesnt matter what my compression is...I should be sending a good 23PSI through her reguardless and turning the timing WAY up. Guys run 14-1 compression and send 30#s of boost through them with C-16....so thats not a problem.
So the more base power I have, the better off ill be all the way around. I get the power I want on pump, with the boost lv my turbos will like.
 

ADRENLN

Active Member
Apr 16, 2003
2,342
3
49
NJ
Sep 19, 2007
#38
  • Sep 19, 2007
  • #38
^ good thinking! that is the way to go. that is why i dont want my compression to low for street use. i want my builder to go nothing under 9.0-1
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Sep 19, 2007
#39
  • Sep 19, 2007
  • #39
^ OFF TOPIC BUT a cheaper and more power capable route would be to run twin Ford GT pumps and no BAP. That combo is said to support nearly 800RWHP. I just bought another Ford GT pump myself actually... $96 shipped from Ebay.
 

HoustonGT

Gilded Gelding
Apr 6, 2003
1,418
0
0
40
Houston
Sep 19, 2007
#40
  • Sep 19, 2007
  • #40
BennyBlown2v said:
Very nice numbers! I might be switching to a similar setup...
Click to expand...

Umm, dibs on your mongoose Vortech setup if you decide to switch
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
519
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
R
Engine 1992 Mustang Hesitation/Cutting-Out
  • RTW0223
  • May 2, 2018
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
14K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 26, 2025
Noobz347
Supercharged 1994 3.8
  • Christian Cornwell
  • Dec 12, 2016
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
37
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 16, 2017
Michael Gordon
M
Paxton On 15 Gt Pp
  • Kenneth sukosd
  • Jan 4, 2016
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
17
Views
5K
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Jan 6, 2016
15GTrob
Need Help, Car Wont Start, I've Gone Through Both Checklists
  • 93silverlx50
  • Jul 22, 2017
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
54
Views
12K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 30, 2019
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?