• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

5.0 Efi ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 6Stang7
  • Start date Start date Apr 28, 2005

6Stang7

New Member
Jun 1, 2003
1,470
0
0
Livermore, CA
Apr 28, 2005
#1
  • Apr 28, 2005
  • #1
can the upper intake and the rest of the efi set up off a 5.0 be used on a 351W? i cant remember if the lower intake for a 302 is the same as a 351. i know that the firing order used on the 5.0 is the same as the 351W's.
 
S

seijirou

Founding Member
Aug 15, 2002
2,417
4
48
DFW
Apr 28, 2005
#2
  • Apr 28, 2005
  • #2
Yes, but not the lower intake. Because of the taller deckheight of the 351, the heads sit farther apart. So the lower intake on 351's is a little bit wider than the 302.
 

6Stang7

New Member
Jun 1, 2003
1,470
0
0
Livermore, CA
Apr 28, 2005
#3
  • Apr 28, 2005
  • #3
ya, thats what i thought. all the wiring is the same right? i'm gonna take the efi stuff off a 87 GT and place it on the 67. after 67 is done, then i am going to get a 351W from a neighboor of mine and build that up. i'd like to take the efi off my car at that point and place it on the 351.
 
S

seijirou

Founding Member
Aug 15, 2002
2,417
4
48
DFW
Apr 28, 2005
#4
  • Apr 28, 2005
  • #4
Yeah the wiring doesn't care what block you're running, none of the wiring actually goes to anyting on the block. If you have a lower intake designed for a 351 efi then it'll work just fine. The only thing I can think of that plugs into the lower is the air temperature sensor and the dash coolant temp sensor. Everything else is ignition, fuel, upper intake or perepherial emissions or otherwise off the engine stuff.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Apr 28, 2005
#5
  • Apr 28, 2005
  • #5
When I purchased my used 351 block (from a 80s Bronco) the lower intake ports were shaped/spaced differently than the 302 ports. Make sure you can find a 351 lower to match to the upper. I don't know if there are any. Aftermarket intakes would be alot better for the air demands of the 351, if the budget allows.

The thing that can really kick your butt though is the camshaft. Some years of 351w used a different firing order than the HO 302. You wont make much power when the ignition timing doesn't match the valve timing.
 

6Stang7

New Member
Jun 1, 2003
1,470
0
0
Livermore, CA
Apr 28, 2005
#6
  • Apr 28, 2005
  • #6
this is an earily 70's 351W, so it's the firing order that the 302 switched over to.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

351W/5.8 EFI intake manifolds fading away...
  • Ryno5150
  • Jan 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
711
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 7, 2026
nickyb
J
i need help
  • JK.
  • Oct 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
551
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 28, 2026
JD1964
Engine Forged flat top pistons from 5.0 fit a 351 build?
  • PonyGTrider
  • May 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
PonyGTrider
K
Engine Gt40p vs 180 procomp
  • Kleinjj27
  • Oct 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
423
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 3, 2026
Kleinjj27
K
N
Looking for ECU/CHIP for 1992 5.0
  • Nathan26
  • Sep 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
306
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 8, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?