• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

5.0 oem cam vs aftermarket cam questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greggk
  • Start date Start date Oct 12, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
G

Greggk

Member
Oct 12, 2009
34
0
6
Ludowici GA
Oct 12, 2009
#1
  • Oct 12, 2009
  • #1
does anyone know what the specs are of the oem cam, such as durations, power range etc? i am looking for a performance cam, but different then what most of you are used to suggesting. i need one for low end torque. reason is its going in an old bronco
 

liljoe07

5 Year Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,622
363
124
Cartersville,Ga
Oct 12, 2009
#2
  • Oct 12, 2009
  • #2
85-88:
Lift: .278 intake, .278 exhaust
Duration: 266 intake 266 exhaust
Overlap: 36 degrees, 9.04 factor
Lobe Center: 115 intake, 115 exhaust

89-90:
Lift: .278 intake, .278 exhaust
Duration: 276 intake, 266 exhaust
Overlap: 39 degrees, 19.51 factor
Lobe Center: 116 intake, 115 exhaust

91-95:
Lift: .278 intake, .278 exhaust
Duration: 276 intake, 266 exhaust
Overlap: 39 degrees, 19.51 factor
Lobe Center: 116 intake, 115 exhaust

93-95 Cobra:
Lift: .282 intake, .282 exhaust
Duration: 270 intake, 270 exhaust
Overlap: 33.5 degrees, 15.24 factor
Lobe Center: 115 intake, 121.5 exhaust
 
G

Greggk

Member
Oct 12, 2009
34
0
6
Ludowici GA
Oct 12, 2009
#3
  • Oct 12, 2009
  • #3
what cam would you recommend for low end grunt and still maintain decent high end?
 

liljoe07

5 Year Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,622
363
124
Cartersville,Ga
Oct 12, 2009
#4
  • Oct 12, 2009
  • #4
What setup is this going in? Engine size, Heads, Intake?
 

liljoe07

5 Year Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,622
363
124
Cartersville,Ga
Oct 12, 2009
#5
  • Oct 12, 2009
  • #5
For clarification, those numbers I posted are advertised Duration. The .050 numbers would be 204°±/ 204°±. The .050 are what most consider the important numbers.
 
G

Greggk

Member
Oct 12, 2009
34
0
6
Ludowici GA
Oct 12, 2009
#6
  • Oct 12, 2009
  • #6
5.0 ho out of a 93 stang, ported e7 heads, intake to be decided yet
 

liljoe07

5 Year Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,622
363
124
Cartersville,Ga
Oct 12, 2009
#7
  • Oct 12, 2009
  • #7
Id just stick with the Stock HO cam. They are better than most give credit for.
 

lancec2c30

Member
May 14, 2008
570
0
16
Washington
Oct 12, 2009
#8
  • Oct 12, 2009
  • #8
One of the best low end torque cams is the stock HO cam like liljoe said. If I were you I would just leave it in there.
 
G

Greggk

Member
Oct 12, 2009
34
0
6
Ludowici GA
Oct 12, 2009
#9
  • Oct 12, 2009
  • #9
well what do yall suggest for more power, and more grunt? just port match the heads and intake?
 

liljoe07

5 Year Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,622
363
124
Cartersville,Ga
Oct 12, 2009
#10
  • Oct 12, 2009
  • #10
Without changing anything on the engine. Rear Gears is the best bet. Personnaly, I dont run anything less than 4.10's. Some guys dont like them for a regular highway driven car. I dont mind. The average guy will get 3.73's.

As long as your using the Stock heads, you will always be handicapped im my opinion. Changing the cam in most cases , when nothing else is changed, usually winds up with a powerband in the upper Rpm's, and very short as the stock heads will run out of steam.

Im also a believer that you should never put money into a stock set of heads.
 
G

Greggk

Member
Oct 12, 2009
34
0
6
Ludowici GA
Oct 12, 2009
#11
  • Oct 12, 2009
  • #11
ummm this isnt a car. its A FORD BRONCO 4x4 i need low end torque and hp for offroading and towing, and there wont be any money in the heads. a very good friend of mine is well known in the corvette world and he is porting my heads for free n exchange for some of my work, so why not do it if its free right?


just so everyone is tracking this is the vehicle getting the 5.0HO
 

liljoe07

5 Year Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,622
363
124
Cartersville,Ga
Oct 12, 2009
#12
  • Oct 12, 2009
  • #12


My Fault, you have to understand that the ratio of Mustangs to 4x4's is about 200,000:1 here . It slipped my mind.
 
G

Greggk

Member
Oct 12, 2009
34
0
6
Ludowici GA
Oct 12, 2009
#13
  • Oct 12, 2009
  • #13
its cool man, i understand, thats why i posted it the way i did, so people would understand they are dealing with a 5200 pound brick with 4wd
 
D

doorvip

New Member
Sep 11, 2009
22
0
0
Oct 13, 2009
#14
  • Oct 13, 2009
  • #14
I use a B ford racing cam. tons of low end power, pulls like a mother. but this is in a 91 notch
 

87GT Drop Top

Member
May 1, 2009
500
3
17
South Florida
Oct 13, 2009
#15
  • Oct 13, 2009
  • #15
call Compcams and their tech will help you pick the right one.
 

No.11

10 Year Member
Oct 13, 2009
614
10
48
Los Angeles
Oct 13, 2009
#16
  • Oct 13, 2009
  • #16
The guy who sold my car said the car has an aftermarket can. How do I know if it really does or if it's just a vaccum leak and also what kind it is without taking apart the engine?
 
G

Greggk

Member
Oct 12, 2009
34
0
6
Ludowici GA
Oct 13, 2009
#17
  • Oct 13, 2009
  • #17
a b cam would be good in this truck? also compcams would do that?
 

lancec2c30

Member
May 14, 2008
570
0
16
Washington
Oct 13, 2009
#18
  • Oct 13, 2009
  • #18
I would assume you are still moving your power up the powerband slightly with the B cam. Don't do an alphabet cam either way, they are old technology.

Yeah, if you are still curious call up Comp Cams. They have great techs that will give you a lot of great info on cam selection.
 
P

phutch11

Member
Nov 14, 2005
328
2
18
Oct 14, 2009
#19
  • Oct 14, 2009
  • #19
I put the oem cam from a 93 mustang into a 90 f150 with ported e7s, so that is pretty close to what you are doing.

The truck definitely has more power, but it is higher in the rpm band than the stock truck cam.
There is less grunt down low no 2 ways about it - but once you are moving, hold on b/c there's more engine than before.

It is much, much quicker getting on the interstate pulling a rig then before and it will pull my duck boat at 70 in OD without downshifting on hills.

Can't remember if you are going carb or not but the Stang cam will work with your computer and will pass emissions. You will need to rewire the spark plugs but not the injectors as some say.

Good luck...
Posted via Mobile Device
 
P

phutch11

Member
Nov 14, 2005
328
2
18
Oct 14, 2009
#20
  • Oct 14, 2009
  • #20
I put the oem cam from a 93 mustang into a 90 f150 with ported e7s, so that is pretty close to what you are doing.

The truck definitely has more power, but it is higher in the rpm band than the stock truck cam.
There is less grunt down low no 2 ways about it - but once you are moving, hold on b/c there's more engine than before.

It is much, much quicker getting on the interstate pulling a rig then before and it will pull my duck boat at 70 in OD without downshifting on hills.

Can't remember if you are going carb or not but the Stang cam will work with your computer and will pass emissions. You will need to rewire the spark plugs but not the injectors as some say.

Good luck...
Posted via Mobile Device
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
855
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Engine HCI Upgrade
  • foxbodyclark
  • Jan 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
498
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 26, 2025
Mustang5L5
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
951
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Fox Fuel Pump Issues After Replacement/Upgrade
  • Ryu
  • Jun 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
607
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2026
Ryu
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
226
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?