• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

5.0 vs. 4.6

  • Thread starter Thread starter 98_stang_guy
  • Start date Start date Aug 25, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Aug 26, 2004
#21
  • Aug 26, 2004
  • #21
I gotta throw in my .02 on this one.

I say PUSHRODS FOREVER and this is why.

Best friend had a 99 Cobra and I drove it many times. Every time I drove it I could not get over the fact that it had NO low end torque. Sure on the big end it pulled hard and all but by the time it started to pull my little 290 hp gt would have showed it's tailights to the big bad Cobra from a good bit farther down the road.

Again to be fair, given enough road the Cobra would have caught me.

The 4.6 NA bad boy was just not as fun to drive as my mild combo 5.0 gt.

When you think about it, Ford had to put a blower on the Cobra to prop up the weak low end.

I will now climb down from my soap box.

Later
Grady
 

TheDamned

"I am Canadian and Damned for it!"
Jul 22, 2003
457
0
48
Montréal, Québec, Canada
Aug 26, 2004
#22
  • Aug 26, 2004
  • #22
98_stang_guy said:
one more question, the GTS...is that a car made by ford, or is it a car that once was a V6 that somebody dropped in a V8?
Click to expand...


yep... i have one.. i have cruise control, thats it.. manual windows\seats no foglights.
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Aug 26, 2004
#23
  • Aug 26, 2004
  • #23
final5-0 said:
Again to be fair, given enough road the Cobra would have caught me.
Click to expand...
Not unless he's been modded . A stock 99 Cobra puts down less than 290 to the wheels, you would have kept pulling no matter how far you went...

The 4.6 NA bad boy was just not as fun to drive as my mild combo 5.0 gt.
Click to expand...
I second that opinion. I've had three 5.0L Mustangs (a '90, '94, and then the last one is my '95 I have now). And I've had three 4.6L's in between -- a '97 GT, '98 Cobra (in chrome yellow ), and a '99 Cobra. I bought my '95 about a week after I sold the '99 Cobra, and even with the '95 mostly stock I was astounded -- I had forgotten how much more grunt a 5.0L has, especially compared to a DOHC modular.

Dave
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Aug 26, 2004
#24
  • Aug 26, 2004
  • #24
If you go with a modular motor, get a 4V. Otherwise you are stuck with the crappy heads and PLASTIC intake manifold. There are ported stock heads out there, but they are very expensive and not worth it IMO.

But, take a 4V, throw a blower and exhaust on it, and you have over 400hp to the wheels, without removing the VC's.
Some see around 450hp.

So get a 4V cobra or mach1, or a 5.0L. Either will be a good decision.
Scott
 
B

BnGRacing

Member
Apr 29, 2004
51
0
6
Chicago area
Aug 27, 2004
#25
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #25
"Horsepower sells cars, torque wins races." -Caroll Shelby. Hands down, the 5.0L motor has more torque. However, the 4.6L mod motor is the future of Ford. So go out and drive a 5.0, a 2v and a 4v and you'll know right away why the 5.0 guys are saying what we are saying...the pushrod Stangs are just more fun to drive!
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Aug 27, 2004
#26
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #26
wytstang said:
5.0 are cheaper but like mentioned they are also 10yrs old thing are going to need replacing..
Click to expand...

It Depends on what yr 4.6 hes looking at, wont be much of a diffrence if hes thinking of a 96-98 VS the 94-95. The 98 has 3 yrs on us as far as being newer but w/ the quality of the 5.0 it dosent seem to be an issue. Mine has 125,XXX Miles and its still very healthy.
 

94Five0

Loose Colon
Dec 14, 2002
349
0
0
Birmingham, Alabama
Aug 27, 2004
#27
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #27
yup. i know an 88lx w/ 245k miles on it..not jus that, but hydrolocked it, several trips to ffw in commece, Ga..b&F from NC 4 times.. yup. of course we have a theory, thats its simply possessed.

only thing he's replaced is the waterpump
 

95YellowGTbeasT

New Member
Mar 4, 2003
605
1
0
South Carolina
Aug 27, 2004
#28
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #28
Get an 03" or 04" cobra and be done with it . Im a 5.0 guy and all most of my friends have 4.6s and i can pretty much wipe the floor with all the mustangs around here except for 1 95 gt and an 03 cobra. Also about the low end torque didnt the MIRC help the cobras produce low end torque from 96-98 and why did they take them out??

Nick
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Aug 27, 2004
#29
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #29
ls1
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Aug 27, 2004
#30
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #30
95snoozer said:
ls1
Click to expand...
Get a 2002 Z06 ... easily turned into an 11-second daily driver.

Dave
 

98_stang_guy

New Member
Apr 17, 2003
121
0
0
Wisconsin
Aug 27, 2004
#31
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #31
95YellowGTbeasT said:
Get an 03" or 04" cobra and be done with it
Click to expand...

im a 17 year old kid, i can bearly afford a 94-98 stang, let alone a '03 or '04
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Aug 27, 2004
#32
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #32
find a 95 hard top

or a 96-97 and do the PI headswap instantly.

it makes a nice foundation
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 27, 2004
#33
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #33
greenlantern said:
Well I test drove a 2001 GT before I bought my 94. And having drove the 94 first the 01 GT did nothing for me. The 01 just could not match the torque of the 5.0 The difference in the seat of the pants was unbelievable.

On top of that there are tons more parts available to mod the 5.0 and parts are going to be alot cheaper than the mod motor.
Click to expand...

I hope your "test drive" was compared to your modified 5.0 or was your 5.0 stock when you drove the 01 GT because that would just make me if you think the seat of the pants difference was unbelievable...

Just to put it in perspective...I'll compare a stock 94-95 5.0 to the "pig" 96-98 4.6L...

5.0 = 285lbs of torque @ 3400rpm
4.6 = 285lbs of torque @ 3500rpm...big difference huh?...lol...

And everybody should know that the 99+ Gt is considerably quicker than the 96-98 Gts so unless you were comparing it to your modified gt then you don't have a very good SOTP...

99+ Gt's can trap upwards of 99-101mph...stock 94-95 (or stock 96-98gt)...around 93-97...

There is a very discreet difference in performance between the 94 5.0 and 96 5.0...

5.0 is easier to work on...4.6 is newer technology and will be better in the future if not already...
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 27, 2004
#34
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #34
HairyCanary said:
Get a 2002 Z06 ... easily turned into an 11-second daily driver.

Dave
Click to expand...

I'm kind of liking that idea

Just get some sticky dr's and your set...
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
Portland, Oregon
Aug 27, 2004
#35
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #35
SOTP meter is highly inaccurate. Personally I don't find any 4.6L motor to be all that impressive in the torque department, including the 03 Cobra (when bone stock). Any modded 5.0L will feel faster through your butt.

Dave
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Aug 27, 2004
#36
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #36
SOTP meter is highly inaccurate.
Click to expand...

Still, if you want to have fun driving, then that's all that matters. I know my car is slow, but hey, it's torquey so it's still fun to drive! I drove some 4.6's before buying the 95 and I didn't think they were so bad. I wouldn't buy one only becuase of how easy our motors are to fix and cheap to mod.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 27, 2004
#37
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #37
The 4.6 has almost exactly the same amount of torque as the 5.0...it's just the 4.6 has a deceiving powerband and opens up when the 5.0 is starting to gasp for air...so makes the 5.0 feel much quicker on the bottom end but actually is not...

The 03/04 Cobra's (just as the previous DOHC 4.6's) have a redline @ around 7k so again the deceiving takes place even though a 03/04 Cobra would waste a stock 5.0 from a dead stop or roll...gears become a big factor in that determinant...
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Aug 27, 2004
#38
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #38
i have owned both a 4.6 (1996) and a 5.0 (1995).

i sold the 4.6 to buy the 5.0 because modding it was so expensive. the 96-98's are the slowest of the bunch (either 5.0 or 4.6). that said, if you want a 4.6, get a 99+.

it is pretty straightforward to put in a stroked 302 (up to 347 ci) or a stroked 351 (up to 408) in a 5.0 based engine.

imo, the 4.6 responds better to supercharging, but the 5.0 is also good for that. you can get more out of a 5.0 naturally aspirated.

my 2 cents,

chris
 

red ink

Founding Member
Apr 8, 2002
746
1
0
Arizona
Aug 28, 2004
#39
  • Aug 28, 2004
  • #39
I'd probably get a newer car just because sweaks and rattles bug the **** outta me on cars. I test drove a mach 1 and wasnt too impressed with it. I thought my cobra sucked till i drove that car. But after i got back in my cobra i was totally in love with it all over again. It's just funner to drive. But in all honestly I'd take a newer mach 1 or cobra over the old car, but not anything less. I wouldnt Not take a 99gt over a 95gt. The reason for this is because if that mach i drove woulda had a 4.10 gear ratio it would flew, because of my buddies 99gt with 4.10's will snap your neck back way harder than my cobra. I'd thow a novi 2000 on the mach and take most ls1 cars anyday. :spot
 

stang_gt_1994

Founding Member
Mar 21, 2002
2,723
0
0
Powder Springs, GA (30 min. from Atlanta)
Aug 28, 2004
#40
  • Aug 28, 2004
  • #40
BTW the Mach 1 runs a 13.1 @ 106 stock on street tires, pretty inpresive if you ask me.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Transmission for manual swapping a 1994-1995 GT
  • Rembrant
  • Jul 11, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
1K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 13, 2025
Rembrant
R
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
344
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
F
Electrical Foxbody wiring harness 2.3 to v8 swap
  • Foxbodyjake
  • Mar 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
732
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 13, 2026
Foxbodyjake
F
Fox Fuel Pump Issues After Replacement/Upgrade
  • Ryu
  • Jun 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
628
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2026
Ryu
J
Timing cover for npi 4.6
  • jay99914
  • Oct 26, 2024
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
260
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 28, 2024
jay99914
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?