• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

5 lug swap experts....Master cylinder Q????

  • Thread starter Thread starter EPIK
  • Start date Start date Nov 11, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

EPIK

Member
Jul 3, 2004
796
1
16
LEFT COAST
Nov 11, 2008
#1
  • Nov 11, 2008
  • #1
I am getting ready to do my 5 lug Cobra front brake swap on my notch & I was curious as to if i have to also change the master cylinder or booster to a 94-95 unit? I am staying with rear drum brakes btw....


Also, would you 5 lug swap experts suggest getting SN95 balljoints, or just running a spacer or washers on the stock fox balljoints? I have no idea if my car needs new balljoints, or if they have been replaced before, but I know the chassis has 172k miles on it.....


Thanks....
 

snakebite01

New Member
Oct 22, 2008
81
0
0
new jersey but not for long
Nov 11, 2008
#2
  • Nov 11, 2008
  • #2
EPIK said:
I am getting ready to do my 5 lug Cobra front brake swap on my notch & I was curious as to if i have to also change the master cylinder or booster to a 94-95 unit? I am staying with rear drum brakes btw....


Also, would you 5 lug swap experts suggest getting SN95 balljoints, or just running a spacer or washers on the stock fox balljoints? I have no idea if my car needs new balljoints, or if they have been replaced before, but I know the chassis has 172k miles on it.....


Thanks....
Click to expand...


go with new ball joints.. it never hurts to replace them.. (i just had my ball joint brake on me and it wasn't a fun ride.. lol)

i would also upgrade the master cylinder since you will have a 13" rotor and a lot more pressure needed for them, also buy the summit proportioning valve!!!
 

EPIK

Member
Jul 3, 2004
796
1
16
LEFT COAST
Nov 11, 2008
#3
  • Nov 11, 2008
  • #3
snakebite01 said:
go with new ball joints.. it never hurts to replace them.. (i just had my ball joint brake on me and it wasn't a fun ride.. lol)

i would also upgrade the master cylinder since you will have a 13" rotor and a lot more pressure needed for them, also buy the summit proportioning valve!!!
Click to expand...

So i need all that stuff to get these to work properly...I guess it would be a good idea to do the ball joints though....So will all brands (moog, auto zone, Napa etc.) of SN95 ball joints bolt up the same???
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,356
208
114
Ohio
Nov 12, 2008
#4
  • Nov 12, 2008
  • #4
IMHO the 93 Cobra MC and Booster are your best choice when upgrading your Brakes!
 

snakebite01

New Member
Oct 22, 2008
81
0
0
new jersey but not for long
Nov 12, 2008
#5
  • Nov 12, 2008
  • #5
EPIK said:
So i need all that stuff to get these to work properly...I guess it would be a good idea to do the ball joints though....So will all brands (moog, auto zone, Napa etc.) of SN95 ball joints bolt up the same???
Click to expand...

yeah.. the proportioning valve is only $40.. the master cylinder you might be able to find in the junk yard for around $50. you could keep the stock master cylinder but your pedal effort is go to be a lot harder.. your better off just getting either the sn95 master cylinder or the 93-95 cobra master cylinder..either way your brakes will be a lot better than using the stocky.
 

trbkrb

Founding Member
Jun 4, 2001
1,976
4
39
Houston, TX
Nov 12, 2008
#6
  • Nov 12, 2008
  • #6
FWIW, get the MOOG brand ball joints. Most people say they are much higher quality than the cheaper ones. As for the MC, a few guys on here have kept the stockers with Cobra fronts & rear drums. Their brakes worked OK, but it probably would be better to upgrade.
 

EPIK

Member
Jul 3, 2004
796
1
16
LEFT COAST
Nov 12, 2008
#7
  • Nov 12, 2008
  • #7
Well i was hoping I was going to be able to get away without doing the MC swap, & getting new balljoints, but I guess I have to add it to the list... As far as the PV, do i really need it even with rear drums??? I am almost at my limit cash wise @ this point & Xmas is coming up so I need to stop buying $h!t 4 myself & focus on others....
 
X

xherdlr

New Member
May 19, 2003
159
0
0
Hendersonville,Nc
Nov 13, 2008
#8
  • Nov 13, 2008
  • #8
SN 95 ball joints will work..

Kelly
 

snakebite01

New Member
Oct 22, 2008
81
0
0
new jersey but not for long
Nov 13, 2008
#9
  • Nov 13, 2008
  • #9
trbkrb said:
FWIW, get the MOOG brand ball joints. Most people say they are much higher quality than the cheaper ones. As for the MC, a few guys on here have kept the stockers with Cobra fronts & rear drums. Their brakes worked OK, but it probably would be better to upgrade.
Click to expand...

the moog brand is the ****!!! the quality is outstanding.. and it looks nice because it's gold on the bottom.. lmao

EPIK said:
Well i was hoping I was going to be able to get away without doing the MC swap, & getting new balljoints, but I guess I have to add it to the list... As far as the PV, do i really need it even with rear drums??? I am almost at my limit cash wise @ this point & Xmas is coming up so I need to stop buying $h!t 4 myself & focus on others....
Click to expand...

you can live with out doing the master cylinder and pv.. but definitely get the ball joints and as soon as you get the money buy the mc and pv.. once you upgrade it you will love how much better it feels..
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,259
17,943
224
Massachusetts
Nov 13, 2008
#10
  • Nov 13, 2008
  • #10
I would do the MC and PV.

Even with drums, you have nostock brakes on the car and need to adjust it. Plus later down the line, you can easily add disk brakes and you already have it setup to go.

As for the MC...93 cobra, or 94-95 GT/V6 or 94-95 Cobra. 99+ V6's have a 1" bore like the '93 cobra, but the threading is different so you'll need to change the fittings that go into it.

For booster...93 cobra or any 94-95 booster
 

FoxBodyGT

New Member
Dec 18, 2002
71
0
0
Austintown, Ohio 44515
Nov 13, 2008
#11
  • Nov 13, 2008
  • #11
I did the swap without changing out the MC/Booster. I autocrossed my car for a full season plus did some track days. No problems. I'm going to do the rears this winter so I will have to do the booster/mc now I guess.
 

snakebite01

New Member
Oct 22, 2008
81
0
0
new jersey but not for long
Nov 14, 2008
#12
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • #12
Mustang5L5 said:
I would do the MC and PV.

Even with drums, you have nostock brakes on the car and need to adjust it. Plus later down the line, you can easily add disk brakes and you already have it setup to go.

As for the MC...93 cobra, or 94-95 GT/V6 or 94-95 Cobra. 99+ V6's have a 1" bore like the '93 cobra, but the threading is different so you'll need to change the fittings that go into it.

For booster...93 cobra or any 94-95 booster
Click to expand...

IMO the booster is unnecessary. but to each his own.. mc/pv i think would be just fine..
 

EPIK

Member
Jul 3, 2004
796
1
16
LEFT COAST
Nov 14, 2008
#13
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • #13
Thanks for all the info guys... I think for now, i will just do the SN95 ball joints. I will see how the brakes feel @ 1st & if I dont like it, i will swap out the MC, booster, & PV...

I only drive the car a few times a month anyway...
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,356
208
114
Ohio
Nov 14, 2008
#14
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • #14
EPIK said:
Thanks for all the info guys... I think for now, i will just do the SN95 ball joints. I will see how the brakes feel @ 1st & if I dont like it, i will swap out the MC, booster, & PV...

I only drive the car a few times a month anyway...
Click to expand...


It is Cheaper, Easier, and Less Expensive to do it right the 1st time out, doing the MC, Booster, and PV will only help you!
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,259
17,943
224
Massachusetts
Nov 14, 2008
#15
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • #15
Here's my view on the PV anyway.

Even with stock brakes, i'd run an adjustable. Reason being we put nice fat tires on the rear. The car was set with 225's in mind. When you have 285's out back, you cna get away with a little more rear braking force.
 

magnj

New Member
May 30, 2007
139
0
0
Nov 14, 2008
#16
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • #16
~hijack

I'm doing 99+ gt/v6 fronts, drums in the rear...will I be ok if I don't do mc/booster/prop?
 

snakebite01

New Member
Oct 22, 2008
81
0
0
new jersey but not for long
Nov 14, 2008
#17
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • #17
EPIK said:
Thanks for all the info guys... I think for now, i will just do the SN95 ball joints. I will see how the brakes feel @ 1st & if I dont like it, i will swap out the MC, booster, & PV...


I only drive the car a few times a month anyway...
Click to expand...

your fine with what your doing.. you won't mess anything up by doing it that way.. just when you get the money upgrade you mc/pv.. the booster is not necessary.. i would only upgrade the booster if you ever switch to a cobra wilwood, ss, or brembo brake set up because you will need that booster to get the full potential out of them.. good luck and post some pics as you do it..

Shakerhood said:
It is Cheaper, Easier, and Less Expensive to do it right the 1st time out, doing the MC, Booster, and PV will only help you!
Click to expand...

how?? i'm not here to argue but he's not going to hurt anything by not upgrading that stuff right now..

Mustang5L5 said:
Here's my view on the PV anyway.

Even with stock brakes, i'd run an adjustable. Reason being we put nice fat tires on the rear. The car was set with 225's in mind. When you have 285's out back, you cna get away with a little more rear braking force.
Click to expand...

+1

magnj said:
~hijack

I'm doing 99+ gt/v6 fronts, drums in the rear...will I be ok if I don't do mc/booster/prop?
Click to expand...

you will be ok but you should upgrade the mc/pv.. it will make everything feel perfect
 

magnj

New Member
May 30, 2007
139
0
0
Nov 14, 2008
#18
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • #18
snakebite01 said:
you will be ok but you should upgrade the mc/pv.. it will make everything feel perfect
Click to expand...

I guess we'll see where I'm at $ wise, this project is getting expensive fast!
 

snakebite01

New Member
Oct 22, 2008
81
0
0
new jersey but not for long
Nov 14, 2008
#19
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • #19
magnj said:
I guess we'll see where I'm at $ wise, this project is getting expensive fast!
Click to expand...

happens all the time to every project.. you hardly ever get away with spending a small amount of loot... every project has "unexpected" costs that are always hidden
 

magnj

New Member
May 30, 2007
139
0
0
Nov 14, 2008
#20
  • Nov 14, 2008
  • #20
snakebite01 said:
happens all the time to every project.. you hardly ever get away with spending a small amount of loot... every project has "unexpected" costs that are always hidden
Click to expand...

When I first researched this upgrade last year I knew I'd have to do the MC, but I totally forgot when I started buying parts last week.

Could I do the proportioning valve only or would that be stupid?
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
68 manual disc/drum master cylinder
  • Butchd88
  • May 27, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
75
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- May 27, 2026
Butchd88
B
J
Wheels-Tires Need Some Help - Brakes Upgrade/Wheel fitment
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
81
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 6, 2026
AeroCoupe
8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
511
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
Brakes FOX BRAKES ISSUES
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
53
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 31, 2026
Mustang5L5
C
Engine Cylinder 5,,7, & 8 run significantly cooler than the other cylinders
  • Crisfixes
  • Sep 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
237
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 27, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?