• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

5 speed from 95 mustang?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ryan218
  • Start date Start date Jan 19, 2008

ryan218

In just 10 years, I'll be old enough to drive!!!!
Dec 28, 2005
0
1
38
columbus ohio
Jan 19, 2008
#1
  • Jan 19, 2008
  • #1
how much of a difference is the transmission from a 95 mustang v6 compared to a foxbody t-5? for strength and gear ratio's?

my buddy who we are putting a sc motor into his sn95 has decided to go a different way with the project and the people who want to buy the mustang are making a road racer out of it...so with that being said there are a few things he dont need and wants us to take them off. one being the trans.


My buddy said if i want the transmission its mine for cheap!

my car is a DD so having a super duty transmission is not a huge concern as my car will not see huge hp numbers a long long time


so tell me info though!
 

FSTNG

New Member
Jun 11, 2007
37
0
0
Tampa Bay, FL
Jan 19, 2008
#2
  • Jan 19, 2008
  • #2
You'll have to swap the input shaft since the fox body's is a bit shorter. Otherwise it'll be fine, I'm using a '97 V6 mustang's T5 on my '89 5.0 with a 200 shot and its been holding fine so far.

Here's the spec chart:
http://www.moderndriveline.com/Technical_Bits/transmission_spec.htm
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
Norman, Ok
Jan 19, 2008
#3
  • Jan 19, 2008
  • #3
FSTNG said:
You'll have to swap the input shaft since the fox body's is a bit shorter. Otherwise it'll be fine, I'm using a '97 V6 mustang's T5 on my '89 5.0 with a 200 shot and its been holding fine so far.

Here's the spec chart:
http://www.moderndriveline.com/Technical_Bits/transmission_spec.htm
Click to expand...

plus the bearing retainer sleeve. i had one in my old coupe. works well, 1st gear is a little lower at 3.97 (iirc) so if you have like 4.10's, 1st gear will SUCK, but otherwise works the same and just fine.
 

ryan218

In just 10 years, I'll be old enough to drive!!!!
Dec 28, 2005
0
1
38
columbus ohio
Jan 19, 2008
#4
  • Jan 19, 2008
  • #4
what about with a 3.73 rear? by suck do you mean 1st gear is just useless?
 

ryan218

In just 10 years, I'll be old enough to drive!!!!
Dec 28, 2005
0
1
38
columbus ohio
Jan 19, 2008
#5
  • Jan 19, 2008
  • #5
FSTNG said:
You'll have to swap the input shaft since the fox body's is a bit shorter. Otherwise it'll be fine, I'm using a '97 V6 mustang's T5 on my '89 5.0 with a 200 shot and its been holding fine so far.

Here's the spec chart:
http://www.moderndriveline.com/Technical_Bits/transmission_spec.htm
Click to expand...



have any videos of the car?
 

FSTNG

New Member
Jun 11, 2007
37
0
0
Tampa Bay, FL
Jan 19, 2008
#6
  • Jan 19, 2008
  • #6
cenok is family said:
plus the bearing retainer sleeve. i had one in my old coupe. works well, 1st gear is a little lower at 3.97 (iirc) so if you have like 4.10's, 1st gear will SUCK, but otherwise works the same and just fine.
Click to expand...

Yeah I forgot to mention that. I was going to re-use my original retainer but the one on the '97 T5 was the steel version instead of aluminum. So, I just measured it and used a bandsaw to remove the difference from the newer retainer sleeve.

ryan218:
I think that the only ratio difference is that the overdrive is slightly taller (higher RPMs) but it's not a big difference. Just check the chart I linked and compare the ratios between the two transmissions.

And no, I don't have any vids of my car.
 

ryan218

In just 10 years, I'll be old enough to drive!!!!
Dec 28, 2005
0
1
38
columbus ohio
Jan 19, 2008
#7
  • Jan 19, 2008
  • #7
FSTNG said:
Yeah I forgot to mention that. I was going to re-use my original retainer but the one on the '97 T5 was the steel version instead of aluminum. So, I just measured it and used a bandsaw to remove the difference from the newer retainer sleeve.


And no, I don't have any vids of my car.
Click to expand...

ok.

so to use a 95 v6 trans i need to swap the input shaft for a fox body input shaft and a fox bearing retainer sleeve?


this would be no big deal as i would have the trans rebuilt before i would put it in either way...

what dose a trans rebuild normally cost if the gears in in perfect shape? to have the syncro's replaced ect?

edit: yes i looked..just a little taller but nonthing drastic!

looks like im gonna start stock piling 5 speed swap parts soon then!!
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Jan 19, 2008
#8
  • Jan 19, 2008
  • #8
Depends on who rebuilds it. For just a rebuild which is bearings and syncros, I charge $400. But you should expect to pay around $700 for a shop to do it.
 

ryan218

In just 10 years, I'll be old enough to drive!!!!
Dec 28, 2005
0
1
38
columbus ohio
Jan 19, 2008
#9
  • Jan 19, 2008
  • #9
795.0pacecar said:
Depends on who rebuilds it. For just a rebuild which is bearings and syncros, I charge $400. But you should expect to pay around $700 for a shop to do it.
Click to expand...


hm how hard is is to do yourself? for the first time doing this to a trans? damn maybe ill just have him sell that trans and buy a fox body t-5...damn that would of been such a good deal.
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Jan 19, 2008
#10
  • Jan 19, 2008
  • #10
I think its something that should be attempted on your own after you have more mechanical experience. I've been rebuilding them for a couple years and now its easy, but the first one I did took me a long time.

You would be better off getting a fox t-5. 85-89 is rated at 265ft-lbs and the 90-93s are rated at 300ft-lbs. If you get a 94+ t-5 you'll end up spending about $70 for a new input shaft and $50 for a new steel input bearing retainer, on top of whatever it ends up costing you to have it rebuilt. Most shops will mark up those parts, and if you get the parts for them, they wont warranty the rebuild.

I personally wont use a T5 made earlier than 93 in my car because only 93+ have a synchronized reverse.
 

ryan218

In just 10 years, I'll be old enough to drive!!!!
Dec 28, 2005
0
1
38
columbus ohio
Jan 19, 2008
#11
  • Jan 19, 2008
  • #11
795.0pacecar said:
I think its something that should be attempted on your own after you have more mechanical experience. I've been rebuilding them for a couple years and now its easy, but the first one I did took me a long time.

You would be better off getting a fox t-5. 85-89 is rated at 265ft-lbs and the 90-93s are rated at 300ft-lbs. If you get a 94+ t-5 you'll end up spending about $70 for a new input shaft and $50 for a new steel input bearing retainer, on top of whatever it ends up costing you to have it rebuilt. Most shops will mark up those parts, and if you get the parts for them, they wont warranty the rebuild.

I personally wont use a T5 made earlier than 93 in my car because only 93+ have a synchronized reverse.
Click to expand...

whats the plus of a synchronized reverse?

so finding a 5 speed from a 90-93 5.0 would be a better choice?
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Jan 19, 2008
#12
  • Jan 19, 2008
  • #12
It wont grind when you put it in reverse when the reverse is synchronized, and yes a 90-93 would be better than a 85-89.
 
M

MaxTheHooker

New Member
Jan 15, 2008
36
1
0
Jan 20, 2008
#13
  • Jan 20, 2008
  • #13
ehh, i just got a brand new t5 from Jegs and i still grind into reverse :'(. i didn't want to get a new one, but the only shop around me is a place called P&B transmissions - the guy wanted 1300 to rebuild my ****. when he told me over the phone i just started laughing and told him i'd be in with the brand new tranny that coming tuesday.
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Jan 20, 2008
#14
  • Jan 20, 2008
  • #14
A T5 from jegs is not a new trans, its just a re manufactured one, so it is very likely you got one that doesn't have a synchronized reverse. It doesn't matter though, its just a nice feature of the 93+ ones.
 
9

92mustanggt509

New Member
Dec 11, 2007
32
0
0
Washington
Jan 20, 2008
#15
  • Jan 20, 2008
  • #15
FSTNG said:
You'll have to swap the input shaft since the fox body's is a bit shorter. Otherwise it'll be fine, I'm using a '97 V6 mustang's T5 on my '89 5.0 with a 200 shot and its been holding fine so far.

Here's the spec chart:
http://www.moderndriveline.com/Technical_Bits/transmission_spec.htm
Click to expand...

i have a 1995 trans in mine. it works perfect. i did have to get a 95 bellhousing though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
136
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
265
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
A
95 Gt intermittent backfire
  • A_A_Ron
  • May 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
396
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 26, 2025
A_A_Ron
A
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
586
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
414
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?