• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

50oz vs 28oz questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Busted07
  • Start date Start date Jan 4, 2006

Busted07

I need my gorilla to be about an inch longer.
Nov 15, 2005
0
3
0
Jan 4, 2006
#1
  • Jan 4, 2006
  • #1
I know this is a little bit late as my motor is already balanced. I bought a steel crank, and a 50oz balancer. the 50 oz balancer is what i was told i need when you run a steel crank along with different bearings, because it is extremely hard to balance a steel crank down to 28oz

the reason im questioning it now is that i read a post in which someone stated that its always better to balance down to 28oz because it allows the engine to rev up a little quicker. but i wants sure if they meant that it was using a stock crank, or any crank for that matter

any truth in this? im kinda stuck as it is for now, im just asking for future refrence when i do my next motor build
 

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
Jan 4, 2006
#2
  • Jan 4, 2006
  • #2
302's use a 50 oz balance while the 351's use a 28
 

Busted07

I need my gorilla to be about an inch longer.
Nov 15, 2005
0
3
0
Jan 4, 2006
#3
  • Jan 4, 2006
  • #3
hold up.. then why is it when i was looking in the newest summit (pg 271) it shows a FRPP dampner, the application states : high performance style for ford 302/351 H.O. 28oz internal balance

im not questioning you, i just dont get it i guess
 

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
Jan 4, 2006
#4
  • Jan 4, 2006
  • #4
yea, im not really sure. I guess you could build a 302 balanced to 28 oz, im no engine builder though.
 

srothfuss

Last night I stabbed the same guy 7 times in a row
Oct 17, 2004
1,796
3
0
Woodward Ave.
Jan 4, 2006
#5
  • Jan 4, 2006
  • #5
Early 302's came in 28oz. The later models came with the 50oz imballance.... I think the switch happend in 1982.

I'd just run the stock 50oz and move on.
 

stangnutlx

New Member
May 24, 2005
242
0
0
Coventry, RI
Jan 4, 2006
#6
  • Jan 4, 2006
  • #6
srothfuss said:
Early 302's came in 28oz. The later models came with the 50oz imballance.... I think the switch happend in 1982.

I'd just run the stock 50oz and move on.
Click to expand...


My 306 is 28oz balanced.... still sitting on the engine stand though
 

stangnutlx

New Member
May 24, 2005
242
0
0
Coventry, RI
Jan 4, 2006
#7
  • Jan 4, 2006
  • #7
FarBeyondDriven said:
I know this is a little bit late as my motor is already balanced. I bought a steel crank, and a 50oz balancer. the 50 oz balancer is what i was told i need when you run a steel crank along with different bearings, because it is extremely hard to balance a steel crank down to 28oz

the reason im questioning it now is that i read a post in which someone stated that its always better to balance down to 28oz because it allows the engine to rev up a little quicker. but i wants sure if they meant that it was using a stock crank, or any crank for that matter

any truth in this? im kinda stuck as it is for now, im just asking for future refrence when i do my next motor build
Click to expand...

You need to run what the assembler told you as far as what balance 50oz. if you go with a 28oz flywheel and harmonic balancer its going to throw the crank and other driveline parts out of whack. Meaning it will wear your main bearings down faster. Think of it as something bieng heavier on one end and out of sync... you dont want to continue to replace parts. if you wanted to run a 28oz 302 you should have had the complete rotating assembly balanced for 28oz...
 
3

304billet

Member
Sep 16, 2005
315
0
16
Jan 4, 2006
#8
  • Jan 4, 2006
  • #8
It is not hard to balance a 302/306 rotating assembly to a 28oz imbalance. A 28oz imbalance does not effect crank or bearing wear whatsover. It is just easier. If what ur engine guy said is correct what about all the 331/347/392/408 that almost r always balanced to 28oz. The best an engine can be balanced is neutral, then 28oz then 50oz. The damper and flywheel or flexplate r used to balance the rotating assembly externally. A neutral balanced rotating assembly is balanced internally to the crank, rods and pistons. A neutral balanced engine will spin higher and last longer.
 
J

Jack's95gt

Member
Aug 15, 2004
443
1
18
Huntingdon Valley, PA
Jan 4, 2006
#9
  • Jan 4, 2006
  • #9
I had my stroker crank balanced to 50oz. because I already had my damper and flywheel. They have to remove lots of metal from the counter weights to get this balance. The end result was good, it runs very smooth.
 

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
Jan 4, 2006
#10
  • Jan 4, 2006
  • #10
the 50 oz or 28 oz... it really is up to the balancer and what he can do... some times the components are to LIGHT and he has to use the 28 oz balance on the crankshaft... most of the time this is the reason they all go to the 28 oz!! It is easyer and more consistant for the balancer!! ( always better to take weight off than to add mallory metal) as for which is better... 28 IMO.

Our balancer will some times be able to lighten the 50oz flywheel enough to make a 28oz dampner work on a 50 oz flywheel... but in the end it is all balanced to 28oz!! confused?? LOL
Just me.............................

Thumper
 

Busted07

I need my gorilla to be about an inch longer.
Nov 15, 2005
0
3
0
Jan 5, 2006
#11
  • Jan 5, 2006
  • #11
thumper460 said:
confused?? LOL
Click to expand...

yeah, i think im gonna go back to riding bicycles


does it make that huge of a difference either way? what i mean is, am i going to lose alot by having it balanced to 50oz? Then again, i guess its better than not having it balanced it all
 
2

2002BLGT

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2003
2,945
4
59
Bedford VA
Jan 5, 2006
#12
  • Jan 5, 2006
  • #12
srothfuss said:
Early 302's came in 28oz. The later models came with the 50oz imballance.... I think the switch happend in 1982.

I'd just run the stock 50oz and move on.
Click to expand...


I dont think they switched untill 85 and I think only the mustang got the switch then .....
 

rd

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2000
3,316
63
109
Ocean Springs MS
Jan 5, 2006
#13
  • Jan 5, 2006
  • #13
302 engines up to sometime in the 80-82 time had the 28 oz balance. The 50 oz started then. All 5.0 GT engines and 82 up 302/5.0's are 50.

351's are all 28.

I think this relates to Ford taking weight out of the crank itself, to make the overall weight less, and then having to add a bit more eccentric weight on the balancer and flexplate to get it balanced.

Supposedly, 28 style cranks have less natural out of balance and are easier to balance. Since stroking moves stuff away from the crank centerline, they are easier to balance as strokers, as they are better to start with.
 

TrophyHead

15 Year Member
Mar 18, 2003
1,195
11
49
PA
Jan 5, 2006
#14
  • Jan 5, 2006
  • #14
So when does a Zero oz. flywheel/balancer come into play?
 
3

304billet

Member
Sep 16, 2005
315
0
16
Jan 5, 2006
#15
  • Jan 5, 2006
  • #15
An engine that is neutral or zero balanced is internally balanced to the crank, rods and pistons. The crank is drilled and mallory is added to balance it to a specific bobweight. The damper and flywheel must be zero balance. A zero balanced engine is the best u can get, the engine will spin higher and last longer and is used for road racing, drag racing and any other sustained high rpm application. Costs anywhere from $400-$1000 or more.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
788
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Tips for WUE and ASE tuning
  • Mustang5L5
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
1
Views
529
Digital Self-tuning Forum Oct 10, 2025
gkomo
Engine 87 NA - Tune or no Tune needed?
  • R82148V
  • Sep 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
329
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 17, 2025
R82148V
Wanting to replace my BOSS 351C Engine Harmonic Balancer - Questions about 'Balance?'
  • 69machmike
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
588
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 5, 2024
Realmongo
Stripped Crank threads and cracked Crank Shaft Ring at end (what is it called?)
  • 69machmike
  • Nov 13, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
313
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 19, 2024
89ripper
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?