'65 347 2x4 winter project, SLOW progress

V

Velox

New Member

May 10, 2009

19

0

0

May 15, 2010

#1

• May 15, 2010

• #1

Well my Christmas 347 project has been going very slowly, couple of hours on weekends here and there, but getting close When heads in and valve train setup I drill primed the oil system, 60psi no problem, then big oil drip on the floor the brand new FoMoCo rear main seal installed in the short block I bought was apparently no good, took awhile to figure out that even new parts can be bad, put in a 'high perf' Fel-Pro Teflon seal, finally got the leak stopped. Got the drive train in, was reusing my fairly new stock clutch and pressure plate, forgot that it was rated for 250-300hp, would not do well with my 347, so took all that back apart and got a new higher rated Kevlar/kevlar setup. This weekend finally had time to complete exhaust, wiring, 2x4 linkage etc, so a few pics for fun below, first start coming up!

View attachment 219239

View attachment 219240

View attachment 219241

View attachment 219242

 

D

D.Hearne

New Member

Sep 29, 2000

11,730

6

0

south louisiana

May 15, 2010

#2

• May 15, 2010

• #2

You have the carbs on backwards. 2x4's mount the carbs turned around vs a single four. This frees up clearance for the distributor and moves the front carb's primaries closer to the center of the motor.

 

armand67Fstback

Member

Oct 30, 2007

146

1

19

May 15, 2010

#3

• May 15, 2010

• #3

Kevlar Clutch

Velox, looks awesome. What brand/model of clutch did you go with? I have a Kevlar/Kevlar that I will be using that is made by a small clutch company.

 

V

Velox

New Member

May 10, 2009

19

0

0

May 15, 2010

#4

• May 15, 2010

• #4

D.Hearne said:

You have the carbs on backwards. 2x4's mount the carbs turned around vs a single four. This frees up clearance for the distributor and moves the front carb's primaries closer to the center of the motor.

Click to expand...

No problem with dizzy room using small head dizzy. Both mounts were used. Carl @ Carl's Ford Parts went over this with me, this is one option that apparently works very well, here is his photo below. My carbs are not backwards, they are exactly how I wanted them, the fuel log fits better and the linkage is better

 

V

Velox

New Member

May 10, 2009

19

0

0

May 15, 2010

#5

• May 15, 2010

• #5

armand67Fstback said:

Velox, looks awesome. What brand/model of clutch did you go with? I have a Kevlar/Kevlar that I will be using that is made by a small clutch company.

Click to expand...

I went with what they recommended at Modern Driveline where I got most of my T5 conversion parts - they advised a Superior Clutch kit - kevlar/kevlar 10.5" rated 400-500hp

 

zookeeper

Founding Member

Aug 25, 2001

3,415

63

109

Rogue River, Oregon

May 15, 2010

#6

• May 15, 2010

• #6

D.Hearne said:

You have the carbs on backwards. 2x4's mount the carbs turned around vs a single four. This frees up clearance for the distributor and moves the front carb's primaries closer to the center of the motor.

Click to expand...

I run mine that way and have no problems clearing a stock distributer. I also run straight linkage (no progressive) and it starts and runs well and actually gets decent mileage. I don't know if I missed his carb sizes, but I run 390's.

 

D

D.Hearne

New Member

Sep 29, 2000

11,730

6

0

south louisiana

May 15, 2010

#7

• May 15, 2010

• #7

That's suprising that they clear the distributor on a small block. The FE's run em backwards. As is the case with my 3x2 setup.

 

hivewax

Member

Jan 1, 2006

233

0

17

Miami, FL

May 16, 2010

#8

• May 16, 2010

• #8

I wish my engine bay was as clean as yours...

 

blown65

Founding Member

Jul 7, 1999

1,938

4

39

Queen Creek Arizona

May 16, 2010

#9

• May 16, 2010

• #9

Our 2-4's on the 67 Shelby were mounted the same way. No clearance issues.