66 Coupe 302 vs 351W

js66coupe said:

My goal is for a nice drive with a good bump in power. Not a daily driver but definately to be driven.

Click to expand...

No one has asked what your budget is or what power you're interested in making... so what is it?

You can build a 350 to 400HP 302 that'll be a kick in the pants and get decent mileage for not too much $. Don't need to fiddle with strokers and all that.

Just might take a step back and decide what you really want.

2+2GT said:

Musta been a function of your intake, because you can get the hood closed on a 351 in a 65.

Click to expand...

109jb said:

Yep. A buddy has a 65 with a 351W and it has the stock hood. The previous poster that needed a new hood has a performer rpm air gar intake which sits kind of tall. It also depends what kind of air cleaner you have. There are low profile air cleaners that will help and that will still flow plenty good. I used to have acar that I had an Edelbrock Pro Flow air cleaner like the picture below. It provides good hood clearance and still flows plenty.

Click to expand...

never said it was impossible heh, it is definatly the specific engine combination i picked and as i said i liked the new hood anyway got to save a couple pounds with fiberglass. impo i like it but that is why it's my opinion i guess .

you address the weight again, and i know they don't weigh 200 lbs different, i just know they don't, the [/B]blocks[/B] are not that much different, and that is where the weight means something, right, what is a little wider intake going to weigh in at? 10 lbs more if it's aluminum? less? Of course i haven't weight both. darn it i should have lol now i feel like stripping my old 289 and go buy a 351 block and weigh em both. I've never seen someone say they weigh more than 100 lbs different.

the size difference is almost nothing, about 1 inch taller and i think ~2" wider? sure the big 'ol headers don't fit quite as well as my old little ittly bitty shorties did, but a little hammering on one shock tower was enough to get clearance, i can take out my spark plugs just as difficultly as it used to be. lol

347 vs say 383, you can get the same power out of them, but the difference will be in the cam, and RPM where the power is in. the 347 would get it's max HP at an RPM the 383 can't even get to, now personally i don't have an INCREDIBLY streetable cam. but when the car is feeling in a good mood i never have a problem tooling around town. but if i start looking at other cars, she makes idle rough : ).

hers a side by side of my 289 i just found on an old computer hah, and my new engine the angle is a little different and the 351 is taken a liiiiitle bit closer to the car, but they are pretty close.

The 351W is about 55 pounds heavier than a 302. That weight is mainly in the block and crank. The 351W weighs 530 lbs. The 302 weighs 475 lbs. All of these weights are for the long block with iron heads.

302 specs here

351W specs here

Also, a 351 fits the bay without modifications, but you can gain some clearance on the sides by just notching the shock towers. You can still use the same suspension and don't have to go to a coil-over or anything like that. Here is a description of shock tower notching.

rebel65 289:



My "sleeper" 393w in a 65':



A 351w does fit OK in the 65/66 chassis with minor mods to the shock towers to accommodate the header tubes. The exhaust is the worst part of this swap due to the narrow engine compartment.

It is not worth swapping a 351w into these cars unless you build a big powerful stroker (408ci or more.) You can get the same (or even better) overall performance out of the lighter weight, lighter rotating assembly 347. The 347 will be easier to work on and you have a distinct advantage as far as headers go. The 302 based motors will also be easier on the drivetrain than the high torque windsors.

If you still want to go the 351w route, it will fit under the stock hood if you use a Stealth or regular RPM intake and a drop based air filter. If you want to get really tricky, you can even hide a modified Vic Jr intake under the hood and yet still use a nice sized air cleaner as I have above. That is a track pic from last week after a drag run and I run it as you see it.

Either way is good for me. For a street setup I would def go the stroker 351 route though. 393 or a 408. Race stuff I would prob go back to a 347 mainly because of header clearance issues. So many advantages of each its really going to be decided on what a person is going to do.

If you get headers made for the 351W in the 64-66, you won't have to hammer anything.

No matter what you do to a 351W to lighten it, the 302 with the same mods will always be lighter.

Of course, people used to complain about the "front heavy" 428 Mustang, but the Fox-body 5.0 Mustang had the same front/rear weight distribution, and a reputation for good handling. Mostly it depends on suspension setup.

The 351w is about 65 lbs heavier. My cast iron heads complete with guide plates and studs were 48 lbs and my edelbrocks heads were 28 lbs complete. You will never notice 25 lbs on your front end.

definatly, if matters where you wants your power. hope we helped lol. heck, next motor i build will probably be a 331 turbo lol.

Below is an example of how much room is gained for working on a 351W when you notch your shock towers. This cost me $14 for 3/16" steel plate to do this and took about 3 hours total.

Below is an example of how much room is gained for working on a 351W when you notch your shock towers. This cost me $14 for 3/16" steel plate to do this and took about 3 hours total.

Click to expand...

What car is this in?

YourBaby'sDaddy said:

What car is this in?

Click to expand...

1970 mustang