• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

'66 Mustang 4 spd to T5, now want tremec

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hizzle
  • Start date Start date Jul 12, 2007

Hizzle

New Member
Jun 24, 2007
51
0
0
Fort Carson, CO
Jul 12, 2007
#1
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #1
Hello. My brother ahs a '65 Mustang that originally had a 4 spd. He did a conversion to a T5 with some aftermarket crossmember and some other conversion pieces. He is hating the T5 right now since he put the 347 stroker in. It just isn't holding up. He wants to put in a Tremec 5speed. Would one fit in there with the T5 conversion he did or does he need to find a whole conversion setup for a '66 if there is one? Thanks
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jul 12, 2007
#2
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #2
The Tremec has a different bolt pattern for the bellhousing. He'll need the old Toploader bell (or did it have a Borg-Warner T10?) and a 1" spacer between it and the Tremec. Or if buying a new Tremec, see if they offer them with the shorter 4 speed input shaft length and use the old bell as is. If it had a Toploader 4 speed, he should have kept it. These are damn near bullet proof and will handle any 347. (and bigger engines as well)
 

65FBE2

Member
Mar 8, 2007
283
0
17
Minnasnowta
Jul 12, 2007
#3
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #3
First of all the Tremec will not fit a 65-66 without extensive tunnel work. If you do put one in without raising the tunnel the drive line angle will be so hosed up it will shake like a wash machine at high speed. Contact Modern Driveline for a T5 custom built to handle the HP of the 347. The T5 can be beefed up to handle 500hp for about the same cost as a Tremec. I just finished this swap myself and I can tell you that this is the way to go for a 65-66
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Jul 12, 2007
#4
  • Jul 12, 2007
  • #4
65FBE2 said:
First of all the Tremec will not fit a 65-66 without extensive tunnel work. If you do put one in without raising the tunnel the drive line angle will be so hosed up it will shake like a wash machine at high speed. Contact Modern Driveline for a T5 custom built to handle the HP of the 347. The T5 can be beefed up to handle 500hp for about the same cost as a Tremec. I just finished this swap myself and I can tell you that this is the way to go for a 65-66
Click to expand...

There are a few companies that offer high performance T5 based trannys. Modern driveline, G-Force... Areo or something like that. A few others. Since you already have the T5 in there, I agree that this is provably the best route to take.
 

Hizzle

New Member
Jun 24, 2007
51
0
0
Fort Carson, CO
Jul 13, 2007
#5
  • Jul 13, 2007
  • #5
He stil has the old 4-speed, he just wanted the overdrive. I'll send him this link, it'll be easier than trying to explain it to him. Thanks
 

2bav8

Founding Member
Nov 30, 1998
2,511
1
47
Mesa, AZ
Jul 14, 2007
#6
  • Jul 14, 2007
  • #6
First of all the Tremec will not fit a 65-66 without extensive tunnel work. If you do put one in without raising the tunnel the drive line angle will be so hosed up it will shake like a wash machine at high speed
Click to expand...
Funny,
Last time I came through the traps at Firebird Raceway at 110 MPH, my TKO wasn't shaking too much. Guess my last 10 years with a TKO has been all luck...
 

Loup-garou

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2001
337
0
16
New Orleans, LA
Jul 14, 2007
#7
  • Jul 14, 2007
  • #7
Hizzle said:
He stil has the old 4-speed, he just wanted the overdrive. *snip*
Click to expand...

With the cost of the Tremec, plus the associated mods to the transmission tunnel and so on - you might tell him to check out a Gear Vendors overdrive unit for the Toploader. Those units aren't cheap, but the combo would be nearly bulletproof.
 

Bosscat

Founding Member
Sep 30, 1999
1,265
0
0
England
Jul 14, 2007
#8
  • Jul 14, 2007
  • #8
2bav8 said:
Funny,
Last time I came through the traps at Firebird Raceway at 110 MPH, my TKO wasn't shaking too much. Guess my last 10 years with a TKO has been all luck...
Click to expand...

You did not have to modify the tunnel? You da man
 

2bav8

Founding Member
Nov 30, 1998
2,511
1
47
Mesa, AZ
Jul 14, 2007
#9
  • Jul 14, 2007
  • #9
No mods to the tranny tunnel. Just adjusted the pinon angle on the rear end.
A lot less work IMO.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Jul 14, 2007
#10
  • Jul 14, 2007
  • #10
2bav8 said:
No mods to the tranny tunnel. Just adjusted the pinon angle on the rear end.
A lot less work IMO.
Click to expand...

Work smart, not hard.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
331
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
D
PLEASE HELP - T5 in a 66, Clutch Issues
  • DvineProphet
  • Jan 23, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 26, 2024
Realmongo
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
592
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?