• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

67 Mustang

  • Thread starter Thread starter sixty7stang
  • Start date Start date Jan 17, 2013

sixty7stang

New Member
Jan 17, 2013
21
0
1
Jan 17, 2013
#1
  • Jan 17, 2013
  • #1
Hey guys I have a 67 Mustang Coupe 3 speed automatic tranny, with a 351 Windsor V8. I have an Edelbrock 4 barrel carb and stock exhaust manifold. The other day while driving down the highway, a newer (I'd say 2006-2008) V6 Mustang which seemed to be stock, drove by at high speed so I decided to have some fun. I let loose and started to catch up. As I got to his bumper we were going about 115. My pedal was to the floor and I could tell that was as fast as I was going to get. He kept going and left me in the dust. It absolutely destroyed my pride haha. What do you guys think I should do to make old Elly faster and accelerate quicker? I don't have a ton of money to spare on her right now also. Thank you all so much in advance.
 

horse sence

15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
12,194
8,027
233
Wile Coyote's stunt double
Jan 17, 2013
#2
  • Jan 17, 2013
  • #2
what is your gear ratio? is the carb opening the butterflies all the way?
headers and a cam with a performer rpm intake and a good distributor will help.
 
Reactions: sixty7stang

Mr67Stang

Active Member
Feb 10, 2007
117
7
28
Fayetteville, NC
Jan 18, 2013
#3
  • Jan 18, 2013
  • #3
Speed costs money. How fast do you want to go?

That is an old saying that was pinned up at the machine shop I used to frequent as a young teen some 25 years ago when I had aspirations of turning my factory 200 hp 289 automatic '67 Stang into some sort of street monster. In most cases you have to make a choice. Do you want to be quick or do you want to be fast. There are two seperate aproaches to either goal with few capable of financing both. With upgrades available today that were out of reach before such as over-drive transmission swaps it is a bit more feasable. You say your car was running out at 115 mph; imagine if you could have shifted to overdrive as that newer Mustang did. Where was your tachometer reading when you were at 115 mph? If you were in your power band still, an over-drive would have given you maybe another 15 - 25 mph depending on your gearing. I have had my '67 up to 126 with stock suspension and brakes. Lets just say its a bit scary when that front end starts to get floaty on you. Now I just want to hit 105 mph... within a 1/4 mile in about 12.something seconds. That's just me realizing my finacial limitations.
 
Reactions: sixty7stang

sixty7stang

New Member
Jan 17, 2013
21
0
1
Jan 18, 2013
#4
  • Jan 18, 2013
  • #4
horse sence said:
what is your gear ratio? is the carb opening the butterflies all the way?
headers and a cam with a performer rpm intake and a good distributor will help.
Click to expand...

Its about 3:08 and i'll have to check on that when i get home today. I have a performance cam in it already. I'm planning on getting headers in the next month or so as well! The distributor isn't bad either. I'm also planning on beefing up the suspension soon
 

sixty7stang

New Member
Jan 17, 2013
21
0
1
Jan 18, 2013
#5
  • Jan 18, 2013
  • #5
Mr67Stang said:
Speed costs money. How fast do you want to go?

That is an old saying that was pinned up at the machine shop I used to frequent as a young teen some 25 years ago when I had aspirations of turning my factory 200 hp 289 automatic '67 Stang into some sort of street monster. In most cases you have to make a choice. Do you want to be quick or do you want to be fast. There are two seperate aproaches to either goal with few capable of financing both. With upgrades available today that were out of reach before such as over-drive transmission swaps it is a bit more feasable. You say your car was running out at 115 mph; imagine if you could have shifted to overdrive as that newer Mustang did. Where was your tachometer reading when you were at 115 mph? If you were in your power band still, an over-drive would have given you maybe another 15 - 25 mph depending on your gearing. I have had my '67 up to 126 with stock suspension and brakes. Lets just say its a bit scary when that front end starts to get floaty on you. Now I just want to hit 105 mph... within a 1/4 mile in about 12.something seconds. That's just me realizing my finacial limitations.
Click to expand...

I would like to add a little speed in the higher rpms, but mainly i want it to get up and go. I would like to be able to get it up to around 120-125 of possible? And also, the timing is just a tad off as we've had to time it by ear for now. I should be getting a timing pointer either today or tomorrow though. That should help just a little bit. But mainly, i want to be able to get up and go quickly.
 

sixty7stang

New Member
Jan 17, 2013
21
0
1
Jan 18, 2013
#6
  • Jan 18, 2013
  • #6
sixty7stang said:
I would like to add a little speed in the higher rpms, but mainly i want it to get up and go. I would like to be able to get it up to around 120-125 of possible? And also, the timing is just a tad off as we've had to time it by ear for now. I should be getting a timing pointer either today or tomorrow though. That should help just a little bit. But mainly, i want to be able to get up and go quickly.
Click to expand...

Also, my tach was at about 5500
 

Mr67Stang

Active Member
Feb 10, 2007
117
7
28
Fayetteville, NC
Jan 18, 2013
#7
  • Jan 18, 2013
  • #7
Also, my tach was at about 5500
Click to expand...
About the perfect shift point for a 351w. Think T-5 conversion to get what your asking for.

What is your rear end gear ratio? For a pretty quick launch and a decent top end I used to like the 3.55:1 gears (this is the gear I had when I hit 126 mph). That was with a 289 and a four speed top loader. 140 mph would have easilly been attainable w/over-drive. However, my care was too floaty at 126, so 140 might have lead to a disasterous end. I now have a 3.89:1 gear and my top end dropped but my get up and go quickness improved.

As mentioned above, you could add some decent long tube headers and a good electronic ignition if not already done.
 
Reactions: sixty7stang

sixty7stang

New Member
Jan 17, 2013
21
0
1
Jan 18, 2013
#8
  • Jan 18, 2013
  • #8
Mr67Stang said:
About the perfect shift point for a 351w. Think T-5 conversion to get what your asking for.

What is your rear end gear ratio? For a pretty quick launch and a decent top end I used to like the 3.55:1 gears (this is the gear I had when I hit 126 mph). That was with a 289 and a four speed top loader. 140 mph would have easilly been attainable w/over-drive. However, my care was too floaty at 126, so 140 might have lead to a disasterous end. I now have a 3.89:1 gear and my top end dropped but my get up and go quickness improved.

As mentioned above, you could add some decent long tube headers and a good electronic ignition if not already done.
Click to expand...

Ok thanks. I have about a 3:08 right now. We are going t be beefing up the suspension within the next couple months though what exactly do you suggest? And i'm also getting some headers soon.
 

sixty7stang

New Member
Jan 17, 2013
21
0
1
Jan 18, 2013
#9
  • Jan 18, 2013
  • #9
Just advanced the timing a bit. Helped alot but its stil not perfectly timed yet
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Jan 18, 2013
#10
  • Jan 18, 2013
  • #10
To get your carb'ed Ford to run right, you are going to have to have a good timing light, and a vacuum gauge. It's so much better to actually "know" what you have going on, instead of trying by ear.
 
Reactions: sixty7stang

sixty7stang

New Member
Jan 17, 2013
21
0
1
Jan 18, 2013
#11
  • Jan 18, 2013
  • #11
woodsnake said:
To get your carb'ed Ford to run right, you are going to have to have a good timing light, and a vacuum gauge. It's so much better to actually "know" what you have going on, instead of trying by ear.
Click to expand...

Oh yea I agree. I just finished timing it correctly a couple hours ago. Runs WAYYY better than she used to. Way quicker.
 

Iamdiffrnt

Member
Nov 13, 2005
197
6
19
South of Detroit, MI
Jan 19, 2013
#12
  • Jan 19, 2013
  • #12
Since you are already running an automatic, I would say, look at a beefed up AOD, or think about a 4R70W trans. The AOD is a decent trans, same gears as a C-4, + Overdrive. The 4R70W already has most of the parts you would use to upgrade the AOD, a lower first gear and overdrive. However the 4R70W is an electronic trans and you would need a controller. I think the trans upgrade will get you where you want to be, then you can upgrade your rear gears as you see fit.
I also would recommend talking to the guys at Silverfox Performance Trans, as they specialize in AOD's and 4R70W transmissions.
Good luck!
 
Reactions: sixty7stang

sixty7stang

New Member
Jan 17, 2013
21
0
1
Jan 19, 2013
#13
  • Jan 19, 2013
  • #13
Iamdiffrnt said:
Since you are already running an automatic, I would say, look at a beefed up AOD, or think about a 4R70W trans. The AOD is a decent trans, same gears as a C-4, + Overdrive. The 4R70W already has most of the parts you would use to upgrade the AOD, a lower first gear and overdrive. However the 4R70W is an electronic trans and you would need a controller. I think the trans upgrade will get you where you want to be, then you can upgrade your rear gears as you see fit.
I also would recommend talking to the guys at Silverfox Performance Trans, as they specialize in AOD's and 4R70W transmissions.
Good luck!
Click to expand...

Ok thanks man! As far as rear end ratio I'm thinking either 3:55 or 3:73.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Jan 19, 2013
#14
  • Jan 19, 2013
  • #14
Steeper gears with your current engine and trans will only make the top speed lower and the cruise RPM higher. I wouldn't go above ~3.50 with a car that sees highway driving and has no overdrive. That's what I have and it's close to 3000rpm at 65mph with a 25.5" tire.

You also didn't mention what year your engine is and/or what year the heads are. Is the 4v intake an original or aftermarket?
 

sixty7stang

New Member
Jan 17, 2013
21
0
1
Jan 19, 2013
#15
  • Jan 19, 2013
  • #15
65ShelbyClone said:
Steeper gears with your current engine and trans will only make the top speed lower and the cruise RPM higher. I wouldn't go above ~3.50 with a car that sees highway driving and has no overdrive. That's what I have and it's close to 3000rpm at 65mph with a 25.5" tire.

You also didn't mention what year your engine is and/or what year the heads are. Is the 4v intake an original or aftermarket?
Click to expand...

Engine is 71-74 and so are the heads. Intake is aftermarket. And I've come to terms with reality and decided not to go for top speed but more off the line quickness which is why I'm thinking 3:55 or 3:73
 

Mr67Stang

Active Member
Feb 10, 2007
117
7
28
Fayetteville, NC
Jan 22, 2013
#16
  • Jan 22, 2013
  • #16
sixty7stang said:
Ok thanks. I have about a 3:08 right now. We are going t be beefing up the suspension within the next couple months though what exactly do you suggest? And i'm also getting some headers soon.
Click to expand...
There are a few good companies out there making upgrade suspension for our classic Mustangs and as of yet, I have not researched a one of them since my suspension is all stock, less the recent purchace of a set of Competition Engineering Slide-A-Link traction bars, I will be looking at it in the future. So, come back and let us know what you go with. I am building my car more for some weekend warrior grudge racing at the local 1/4 mile track so I wont be spending a lot of money to try and make the care run "Dead Mans Curve".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
67 Mustang, with the 302 want to convert auto back to the original manual
  • Pdunn
  • May 3, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
100
Classic Mustang Specific Tech May 7, 2026
Mcmahst
5
Hello fellow Mustang fanatics.
  • 580HP*428Cj
  • Apr 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
167
The Welcome Wagon Apr 2, 2026
General karthief
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
198
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
R
8.8 rear end for '67 coupe, shortened - next steps
  • rubendenver
  • Dec 15, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
717
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jan 8, 2025
GOvert
G
Returning after 17 Years
  • sketman
  • Jun 20, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
7
Views
222
The Welcome Wagon Jun 20, 2025
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?