• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

68 Fastback- rear bumper fitting problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter moonraker
  • Start date Start date Apr 2, 2009

moonraker

Member
Jun 3, 2008
96
4
9
Moscow Russia
Apr 2, 2009
#1
  • Apr 2, 2009
  • #1
Hi, friends!
I am restoring 68 Fastback (and it's not easy to do in Russia!). The body shop try-fitted the rear bumper and there's a big problem - the bumper is wider than the body. The bumper doesn't align with q-panel extensions (it doesn't match the shape and it extends beyond outer surface of q-panel). I ordered bumper and q-panel extensions at Year One. Did anybody encountered the same issue? What is the reason for this misalignment - poor quality of bumper or poor job of body shop? I appreciate all opinion - I don't really really know what to do. To order another bumper from different catalog? But I am in Russia - what if the new bumper doesn't fit too?





 
M

mr-fixit

Founding Member
Jul 19, 1999
466
0
17
Malvern,Pa.
Apr 2, 2009
#2
  • Apr 2, 2009
  • #2
Actually, that looks like a pretty good fit. Check pictures of other Mustangs and you will see most bumpers stick out past the 1/4 panel. I think reproduction bumpers in paticular fit like this.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Apr 2, 2009
#3
  • Apr 2, 2009
  • #3
+1 unfortunately that's the way they were originally designed to fit. One of the mods that Chip Foose and many other customizers do is to cut the bumpers and make them fit the body much better. Most 60s and 70s American cars have lousy bumper fit like that.
 
R

Rick Brown

New Member
Apr 1, 2009
1
0
0
Apr 2, 2009
#4
  • Apr 2, 2009
  • #4
yea,I agree on the fit But,ya got what ya got unfortunately.But when you get the paint on, it won't be near as noticeable. Good Luck Rick
 
O

other_shoe

Member
May 4, 2007
313
3
19
Apr 2, 2009
#5
  • Apr 2, 2009
  • #5
Totally frustrating and totally common.

It will look better with paint. And from a distance.

The tolerance for gaps listed in the old mustang shop manuals is surprisingly high compared to a modern car.

With mine the key was getting balance on both sides and getting the pitch of the bumper correct. Don't laugh, but the bright shiny letters and new tail light bezels and possibly exhaust tips will really help.

So does driving it.
 

moonraker

Member
Jun 3, 2008
96
4
9
Moscow Russia
Apr 2, 2009
#6
  • Apr 2, 2009
  • #6
Thank you all for your replies. It's quite upsetting - the bumper looks like it's from another model or year. I was ready to cut the bumper to make it fit better but it turns out that to re-chrome it in Russia would cost me about 2 grand and take 4-5 months! It's insane! Can you give me a ballpark figure if I do re-chrome in USA?
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Apr 2, 2009
#7
  • Apr 2, 2009
  • #7
I don't agree with the previous posts, before I took my fastback apart, it fit fairly well. I'd suspect the end caps may be the issue. I have my original bumper and a Nordan-brand bumper I got from NPD and they are nearly identical in fit, so I think anything Year One would have would be the same, since they have a good reputation. The gap between the top of the bumper end and the bottom of the end cap should be very close on an original, maybe a bit bigger than the door gap. The Shelby end caps are a different story, and they had a gap about the same as yours. I cannot even imagine what it must be like to get parts in Russia, but if it were me, I'd look for original Ford caps, and I'll bet they fit better. As for getting the bumper rechromed if you decide to go that route, I'd expect to spend between $300 to $500 to get a nice job done. But first I'd try ebay or maybe one of our members here and see if someone could help you out. If I still had my original caps, you'd be welcome to them, but they went on ebay many moons ago.
 

BarnStang

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2001
1,260
3
39
Hagerstown, MD
Apr 2, 2009
#8
  • Apr 2, 2009
  • #8
Were the quarter panels replaced? Check the fit of the rear lower valance. It should match up on each side pretty good. If the valance is wider than the qtr pnls where that valance fits, then the shop got your qtr pnls on too close together. Ask me how I know...if it fits perfectly, then I think you may have to live with it. It does look a little much to me. Is there that much gap equally on both sides?
A good body shop could compensate for a little of that, but you are not going to get even half that gap cloesed with body work or it will start to look funny. Check the valance and post back.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
S
Fox New to me 82 GT
  • Stangman7082
  • Jan 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 18, 2025
AeroCoupe
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
287
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
S
what would you do? sell the project and buy completed or finish project?
  • STANG32
  • Feb 8, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
574
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 16, 2025
rusty428cj
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
425
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?