• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

6spd vs 5spd

  • Thread starter Thread starter Coolman532
  • Start date Start date Jan 24, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

00s281sc368

New Member
Dec 14, 2003
532
0
0
Fremont, CA
Jan 25, 2004
#21
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #21
That one (2.66/1.78/1.30/1.00/0.74/0.50) is the Viper type, which has a 6th gear ratio ok for an 8 liter V10 but tough for a mustang...
The T56 of 03 cobras has following ratios: 2.97/2.07/1.43/1.1/0.8/0.62
 

00s281sc368

New Member
Dec 14, 2003
532
0
0
Fremont, CA
Jan 25, 2004
#22
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #22
That one (2.66/1.78/1.30/1.00/0.74/0.50) is the Viper type, which has a 6th gear ratio ok for an 8 liter V10 but tough for a mustang...
The T56 of 03 cobras has following ratios: 2.97/2.07/1.43/1.1/0.8/0.62
 

neoclasiccl

Founding Member
Jun 1, 2002
3,043
0
57
Help I can't see !!!!!!
Jan 25, 2004
#23
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #23
Just a note reguarding the 6 gear in the T56 with the stock 3.55's the RPMs are higher in 6th than my GT with the 3650 was in 5th at the same speed. The gears are alot closer together which is good for racing but general driving can get tiresome. When driving normally I usually go 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th
 

vipergts281

Mr. Metrosexual
Founding Member
Apr 17, 2002
2,503
0
0
Probably driving somewhere.
Jan 25, 2004
#24
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #24
I like my 6-speed.

What RPM's are you GT drivers at in 5th gear doing, say.....65, 70, 75?
 

downsouthman1

Member
Dec 16, 2003
643
0
16
Texas
Jan 25, 2004
#25
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #25
vipergts281 said:
I like my 6-speed.

What RPM's are you GT drivers at in 5th gear doing, say.....65, 70, 75?
Click to expand...
2337 for 65 to 2697 for 75 based off calculations @ http://www.tchracing.com/tech/gearcalc.php w/ 4.10s.
 

vipergts281

Mr. Metrosexual
Founding Member
Apr 17, 2002
2,503
0
0
Probably driving somewhere.
Jan 25, 2004
#26
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #26
downsouthman1 said:
2337 for 65 to 2697 for 75 based off calculations @ http://www.tchracing.com/tech/gearcalc.php w/ 4.10s.
Click to expand...
Thanks. But I meant with stock gears....I should of mentioned that. I'll just use the link you posted, thanks.
 

downsouthman1

Member
Dec 16, 2003
643
0
16
Texas
Jan 25, 2004
#27
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #27
No problem. I guess it should've been inherent that you meant stock gears. My bad.
 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Jan 25, 2004
#28
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #28
Stock gears was something like 70 or 75 @ 2000 rpms.

But the stock gears sucked.
 

downsouthman1

Member
Dec 16, 2003
643
0
16
Texas
Jan 25, 2004
#29
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #29
I used to go about 2200 RPMS in 5th @ about 78mph. The chart @ the website should show something similar.
 

vipergts281

Mr. Metrosexual
Founding Member
Apr 17, 2002
2,503
0
0
Probably driving somewhere.
Jan 25, 2004
#30
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #30
GinoGT said:
Stock gears was something like 70 or 75 @ 2000 rpms.

But the stock gears sucked.
Click to expand...
Hah, I bet 3.27's do suck. 4.10's are much better in a GT. As for me, I'll be sticking with my stock 3.55's. Traction is already bad as it is.
 

downsouthman1

Member
Dec 16, 2003
643
0
16
Texas
Jan 25, 2004
#31
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #31
It's kinda cool w/ 4.10s. I mean I don't really all to well know yet since I'm still breaking-in the clutch but 2nd I can romp & hold trac for the most part & 3rd will hold good. 1st I won't mention as far as holding quality.
 

vipergts281

Mr. Metrosexual
Founding Member
Apr 17, 2002
2,503
0
0
Probably driving somewhere.
Jan 25, 2004
#32
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #32
downsouthman1 said:
It's kinda cool w/ 4.10s. I mean I don't really all to well know yet since I'm still breaking-in the clutch but 2nd I can romp & hold trac for the most part & 3rd will hold good. 1st I won't mention as far as holding quality.
Click to expand...
Well that's good. You must have some sticky tires.

If I get on it, I don't grip until 3rd. It's a good and a bad problem to have.
 

downsouthman1

Member
Dec 16, 2003
643
0
16
Texas
Jan 25, 2004
#33
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #33
I somewhat understand. I compared gears 1-5 on my tranny to same gears on your tranny & it's basically identical. But I need 4.10s to attain what you have & be off less than 5mph w/ any same gear & any same RPMs. But YOU STILL have another gear, & that's the beauty of the T-56 Cobra Tranny.
 

vipergts281

Mr. Metrosexual
Founding Member
Apr 17, 2002
2,503
0
0
Probably driving somewhere.
Jan 25, 2004
#34
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #34
downsouthman1 said:
I somewhat understand. I compared gears 1-5 on my tranny to same gears on your tranny & it's basically identical. But I need 4.10s to attain what you have & be off less than 5mph w/ any same gear & any same RPMs. But YOU STILL have another gear, & that's the beauty of the T-56 Cobra Tranny.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I need that extra gear with the way I drive. I usually speed. So the rpm's are high even in 6th.
 

Slider

Founding Member
May 19, 2000
729
1
18
Gainesville, FL
Jan 25, 2004
#35
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #35
Ok, I think a few things need cleared up about transmissions and gears, because it seems that a lot of you don't understand. The idea of a gear train is to trade of speed for torque or vise versa. Gear something down you can get more torque, but you lose speed. When it comes to motors/engines gears help to convert the engines speed from 6000 rpm and 300 lb*ft of torque to something more useful for propeling a car. 300 lb*ft of torque is not enough to make a 3500 lbs car accelerate at any usuable rate. Also, if you turned the rear wheels at 6000 rpm you would be doing 40,841 ft per minute (6.8 ft per rev) or 7.73 miles per minute (5,280 ft per mile) which is 464 mph. So, first gear in a trans is to trade off speed for torque. OD is basically used to trade off torque for speed.

When it comes to the number of gears in a trans the number of gears and the actual ratios that are picked depend on the application. If 1st gear can give you a lot of off the line acceleration and OD can give you top speed, then you can use gears in between to give you different levels of acceleration or speed to bridge the gap. Every time that you use a gear there is some range that the engine's rpm is going to overlap into the range of the next gear's. 6000 rpm in 1st is, for instance, 1000 rpm in OD. The more gears that you add the more each gear's rpm range overlaps the next gear's. The idea is to select the number of gears and their ratio so that the gear's rpm bands overlap so that the engine is always in its power band. For example, the 4.6L like to make its most power in n/a "stockish" form from 3500 to 5500 rpm. You want to select the number of gears and their ratios so that through your whole race that you can always select a gear to stay in this rpm range to maximize performance. Less gears mean that you will have to go out of the engine's power band. The trade off of having more gears is that you have to shift more often. The closer the rpm ranges the more peak power you can uses.

Averaging the power of the gears is the baest way to see this. With only 3 spds you power usage would look like 3 peaks overlapped where there is a large space between the peaks. As you added more gears the peaks become closer together, and the average power used goes up. See picture.



The engine's power band has a lot to do with how many gears you have. Engine's with "peaky" power bands require trans with more gears to keep the car inteh power band. Themore power you make through out the rpm band the less important the number of gears that you have. Yes, I know the new cobra comes with a 6 speed. That is however due to the fact that the car is designed for road racing where being in the peak of teh power band is very important. Also, I think a lot of it has to do with the "coolness" factor.

The rear end gear basically scales all the ratios up and down by the same amount, and is used to give you more overall top speed or more off the line accel.
 

Attachments

  • trans 3 vs 5 spd.webp
    37.9 KB · Views: 195

downsouthman1

Member
Dec 16, 2003
643
0
16
Texas
Jan 25, 2004
#36
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #36
Well put slider. Thanks for clearing up some of the ?s I didn't ask. I understood half of the concept. Now I understand more. I do have a ? related to another subject. Your sig says you have a SPEC Stage 2 clutch. How many miles did you break it in?
 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Jan 25, 2004
#37
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #37
The 03 Cobra also has a T56 because of it's (UNDERRATED) 390HP/390TQ, and the fact that SVT/Ford knows the cars will be beat on, as well as modified. Modification in this case being significant, since a smalley pulley and a great tuner can get the car way into the 400's RWHP.

A T3650 probably wouldn't put up with that kind of abuse for any extended period of time. Plus the fact that those cars are also going to see plenty of duty as daily drivers, Ford wouldn't enjoy repairing busted input shafts and blown synchros (or whatever the heck it is would go wrong) on their $$$.
 

Coolman532

New Member
Nov 29, 2003
49
0
0
San Jose, CA
Jan 25, 2004
#38
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #38
I was just thinking. What would happen to a car that came with a 6spd standard and switched it to a 5spd. For example switching the 03 cobra trans to a 5spd. Not that i would want to do this. But i am just wondering is it possible. How would it effect the performance.
 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Jan 25, 2004
#39
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #39
Coolman532 said:
I was just thinking. What would happen to a car that came with a 6spd standard and switched it to a 5spd. For example switching the 03 cobra trans to a 5spd. Not that i would want to do this. But i am just wondering is it possible. How would it effect the performance.
Click to expand...

Who knows. For the most part, it's just about what the ratios are. Ratios better suited to the car, better performance. Bad ratios, bad performance.
 

downsouthman1

Member
Dec 16, 2003
643
0
16
Texas
Jan 25, 2004
#40
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #40
True that's why 4.10s work so well w/ a NA T-45.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Remake Clutch and Transmission Suggestions for a 2014 6 spd manual
  • adamchrysler
  • Jul 30, 2025
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
195
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Aug 8, 2025
SuperCharged_Coyote
S
C
Engine 01 gt
  • Carboni
  • Jun 28, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
208
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 19, 2025
nickyb
Mustang II 4 cyl gear hunting and possibly messed up vacuum system
  • oesterreicher
  • May 31, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
11
Views
167
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Sunday at 5:39 PM
manicmechanic007
E
4.6l auto to 5.4l 6 speed
  • EastanF5
  • Jan 22, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
164
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 22, 2026
EastanF5
E
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
611
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?