• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

'79 Twin turbo'd 5.4L IRS coupe on ebay

  • Thread starter Thread starter FordRacing302
  • Start date Start date Jun 4, 2011
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

FordRacing302

5 Year Member
Oct 1, 2005
384
42
59
Cleveland, TN
Jun 4, 2011
#1
  • Jun 4, 2011
  • #1
Not a fan of the louvers, spoiler, or front lip but other than that this thing is badass

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1979...2589182?pt=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item45faed25fe
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Jun 4, 2011
#2
  • Jun 4, 2011
  • #2
Ahh yes, the "Mach 1 Fox" as many have called it. Good craft, but overall something big is missing appearance wise.
 

LarsD

Founding Member
Jul 2, 2002
2,680
119
123
Texas
Jun 4, 2011
#3
  • Jun 4, 2011
  • #3
Agreed on the lip, lovers, and wing. Looks badass otherwise. Been having a DOHC Fox nagging at my brain for the last couple of weeks. Too bad it will be years before I could make it happen.
 

1bad67sbf

Active Member
Nov 24, 2010
674
1
29
N. VA
Jun 4, 2011
#4
  • Jun 4, 2011
  • #4
that thing would be fun to drive but i would hate to find and fix issues that come up.
 

1991notchbackLX

Active Member
Dec 25, 2007
1,483
47
48
New York
Jun 4, 2011
#5
  • Jun 4, 2011
  • #5
That car is local to me and it's been for sale for months now. The price tag is scaring people away, I think. Building a car like that is not a money making endeavor, that's for sure. I've been tempted to go see it just for the hell of it, though.
 

95BlueStallion

My assy trans to myself
15 Year Member
Feb 22, 2007
5,126
3,091
214
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Jun 4, 2011
#6
  • Jun 4, 2011
  • #6
For the amount of money in it, why the hell would you leave the back seat looking so cheap? Also, I wonder why they relocated the door handles on the inside, and blocked off the old holes. Doesnt look like they interfered with the dash, and now the door panel looks funky. I bet that car has more than a few gremlins.
 

Legacy5.0

Member
Sep 17, 2010
43
0
16
New Hampshire
Jun 4, 2011
#7
  • Jun 4, 2011
  • #7
No sir, I don't like it.
 
9

94gtfreak

Active Member
Oct 19, 2008
412
4
39
your moms house
Jun 4, 2011
#8
  • Jun 4, 2011
  • #8
It's overall not a bad car...the louvers are gawdy as hell. The other things include the 4 6x9's in the RSD and the coolant overflow tank right next to the hot side of the drivers side turbo. Otherwise not a bad car. Wasn't it a magazine feature at some point? (probably says in ad just to lazy to look)
 

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Jun 4, 2011
#9
  • Jun 4, 2011
  • #9
Aside from the chin splitter, louvers and spoiler....What's got me scratching my head is the shaker, er, non-shaker scoop.... if he liked the look of the scoop, why not just attach it to the hood if it's not functional?

This aside, there are some touches that made me smile. Having had one of the origional Machs, seeing the origional style lettering on the decklid was a sweet flashback! I loved my Mach! Miss it...
 

jgarrard

Member
Apr 3, 2010
90
0
7
Gadsden,Al
Jun 5, 2011
#10
  • Jun 5, 2011
  • #10
Who sticks 4 6X9s out to display like its something cool? It looks like something people did in the mid 80s. It looks like the shaker is functionable but I never gave the newer machs a second look. They just wasnt my cup of tea.
 

capri debris

Member
May 5, 2007
289
6
18
PA
Jun 5, 2011
#11
  • Jun 5, 2011
  • #11
95BlueStallion said:
I wonder why they relocated the door handles on the inside, and blocked off the old holes.
Click to expand...

Uuuum, they didn't relocate the door handles.... that's where they were located from the factory in 1979.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Jun 5, 2011
#12
  • Jun 5, 2011
  • #12
Yea, I've seen it before. Overall, not a terrible car, but I would have done a few things differently.
 

95BlueStallion

My assy trans to myself
15 Year Member
Feb 22, 2007
5,126
3,091
214
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Jun 5, 2011
#13
  • Jun 5, 2011
  • #13
capri debris said:
Uuuum, they didn't relocate the door handles.... that's where they were located from the factory in 1979.
Click to expand...

Didnt know that. I thought they were up higher where those little plates were. Looks like the stock location in the 80's foxes.
 

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Jun 5, 2011
#14
  • Jun 5, 2011
  • #14
jgarrard said:
Who sticks 4 6X9s out to display like its something cool? It looks like something people did in the mid 80s. It looks like the shaker is functionable but I never gave the newer machs a second look. They just wasnt my cup of tea.
Click to expand...

A functionable shaker scoop directs the air into the engine....not ONTO the engine. This thing has twin turbos with air cleaners on the cold side.
 

Decurion

Member
Sep 28, 2006
353
0
16
Livonia, MI
Jun 5, 2011
#15
  • Jun 5, 2011
  • #15
It kinda looks like he had a junk fox collecting dust, then smoked his Mach 1 and said "I bet I could..."
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Jun 5, 2011
#16
  • Jun 5, 2011
  • #16
95BlueStallion said:
For the amount of money in it, why the hell would you leave the back seat looking so cheap? Also, I wonder why they relocated the door handles on the inside, and blocked off the old holes. Doesnt look like they interfered with the dash, and now the door panel looks funky. I bet that car has more than a few gremlins.
Click to expand...


Actually, I think that is where the handles are on a 79. I think those panels are from a later year and thats where ford put the handles then.
 

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Jun 5, 2011
#17
  • Jun 5, 2011
  • #17
Mustang5L5 said:
Actually, I think that is where the handles are on a 79. I think those panels are from a later year and thats where ford put the handles then.
Click to expand...

Yup. I had a 79. handles were down at the bottom. Drove it a long time, got an 84 and couldn't find the handles in the dark!
 

jgarrard

Member
Apr 3, 2010
90
0
7
Gadsden,Al
Jun 6, 2011
#18
  • Jun 6, 2011
  • #18
I feel dumb for not putting the turbos into that equation. Duh..
 
T

TokyoJoe

New Member
Mar 25, 2007
179
5
0
Jun 6, 2011
#19
  • Jun 6, 2011
  • #19
IRS? Blah!
 

bcam347

Member
Feb 27, 2011
76
6
8
Jun 7, 2011
#20
  • Jun 7, 2011
  • #20
looks like this:
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
For Sale 1970 Mustang Coupe Restomod Project for sale
  • stonecoldtx
  • Jan 1, 2020
  • Classic Mustangs For Sale
Replies
7
Views
4K
Classic Mustangs For Sale Sep 8, 2021
Fuquaj
F
S
For Sale 2003 Cobra Redfire Convertible
  • SpectorV
  • Feb 20, 2019
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
5K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Feb 20, 2019
SpectorV
S
Progress Thread 92 Coupe Resurrection Thread
  • squeak93
  • Apr 10, 2015
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 5 6 7
Replies
136
Views
14K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 1, 2015
Boosted92LX
J
  • Locked
Expired 1988 Mustang Lx Notchback Coupe With 13,006 Original Miles
  • Joe95StangGT
  • Sep 9, 2012
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Sep 9, 2012
Joe95StangGT
J
WTF is wrong with people !
  • betke76
  • Sep 8, 2011
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
36
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 9, 2011
S&B
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?