• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

80 6 cyl

  • Thread starter Thread starter splogan
  • Start date Start date Feb 19, 2006

splogan

Founding Member
Mar 31, 2002
127
3
19
Feb 19, 2006
#1
  • Feb 19, 2006
  • #1
Not sure which section to be in so I am here. Are the 80 6 cyl cars any good. I do not know much about them. Found one with a beautiful body and interior for cheap.
 

93PONY

Founding Member
Mar 11, 2002
219
0
0
pensylvania
Feb 19, 2006
#2
  • Feb 19, 2006
  • #2
is it a 2.8 v6 or a 3.3 inline six? i had an 82 mustang with a 3.3 il6 and it was one of the best cars i ever owned. very strong durable engine with plenty of torque. not much in the hp department though. if i remeber right they were like 93 hp from the factory. but a great engine. now the 2.8 v6, is just plain junk, if it has that in it i would still get it but put a new motor in it. you will end up doing that any way unless you like changing head gaskets alot,lol. and if you do get it keep the original nose on it dont put one of the newer style ones, there are too many of them out there and not enough 4 eyed beast out there anymore.
josh
 
R

RustBucket

New Member
Jun 8, 2003
585
0
0
Buford, GA
Feb 19, 2006
#3
  • Feb 19, 2006
  • #3
If you buy the car with the intent of swapping the drivetrain to either a V8 or even a 4cyl, keep in mind that if it is in fact an inline 6 car, the k-member is different than those in the V8/L4 cars so you'll end up swapping that out as well. the L6's aren't bad motors if you leave them alone. There's some cool stuff being done to them performance wise, but I think the same can be accomplished with a V8 or even a turbo4 with less effort per hp.

But hey if the price is right and the car really is that clean, go for it!!
 

Red_LX

I’m not much help unless you’re looking for ****!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,896
73
129
Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
Feb 19, 2006
#4
  • Feb 19, 2006
  • #4
Hell, if it's that nice, I'd pick it up regardless of what engine is in it.
 

splogan

Founding Member
Mar 31, 2002
127
3
19
Feb 19, 2006
#5
  • Feb 19, 2006
  • #5
Guy said 1500 but more than likely I figure 1200 or so for the car. I did not get to look at very long but what I did see no dents, rust of any kind and the paint looked pretty good The interior looked clean. It is an auto car, silver with red interior.
 

93PONY

Founding Member
Mar 11, 2002
219
0
0
pensylvania
Feb 20, 2006
#6
  • Feb 20, 2006
  • #6
go for it
 

Anlushac11

Founding Member
Feb 17, 2001
2,270
0
0
Indianapolis, Indiana
Feb 20, 2006
#7
  • Feb 20, 2006
  • #7
I currently have a 1980 Mustang Ghia hatchback with a 3.3L and a 1981 no a/c Mustang T-top coupe with a 3.3L I6. I think the I6 cars are a great treasure and can be built up into very nice running street performers.

I dont remember if we are allowed to post links to other sites so I will PM you with I-6 links.

The K-member is different, all other parts are standard Fox. Anything you can do to a Fox Mustang to improve performance you can do to a I6 Fox to improve performance.

The weight is similar to a 2.3L Mustang. My 1980 hatch with I6, C4 auto, a/c and P/S was weighed at 2866lbs on a certified truck scale. Weight distribution was 58/42 mostly due to the longer I6 engine sticking so far forward over the wheels. Any weight removed from the nose goes a long way to restoring balance. The 86LX hatch I used to have with 2.3L auto, P/S, A/C, Power door locks, and power windows weighed almost 3200lbs. My old Capri turbo R/S was weighed at 2779lbs.

I currently have 3 sets of wheels but I am running a set of P215/60HR-14's and the car handles very well with stock springs and swaybars. I have a set of M-5300B springs and a 1.12" front and a choice of .58", .79", and .95" rear swaybars. My car is still not running because I was laid off work for 3 years. But I started back to work in November and am moving forward...slowly.

Things to watch for:

If at all possible go to a junkyard and grab a set of 10" brakes off any 1987-93 4 cyl Mustang. You will need to run 14" or larger wheels with the 10" brakes if I remember correctly. The stock 9" brakes are woefully inadequate. Do a search in these forums for the brake upgrade swap and there should be lots of info you will need.

It seems all 3.3L auto tranny Mustangs got 2.73:1 geared rears which is good for highway economy but leaves the car struggling to accelerate. Any 87-93 Mustang 7.5" rear with 3.45 or 3.73 gears will be a improvement even if just in ratio.

Make sure your motor mounts are in good shape. There is not much room between the fan and the radiator so if the mounts go bad the fan will eat the radiator.

The cars are old enough that you might want to consider changing the head gasket. Thats what sidelined mine. The factory head gasket was a steel shim head gasket. After 26 years they often are about to fail. It is recommended that you pull the head, get it reconditioned, mill .060" off, and use a good modern head gasket such as the print-o-seal kind. You mill the head because the old head gasket is much thinner than the new composite gaskets and the thicker gasket will drop your compression half a point or so. So you mill the head to bring the compression back to stock and maybe raise it a hair.

If you have the money one of the links I will send you is to a 170-250 I6 performance site that will have a aluminum closed chamber high swirl high flow head coming this spring. The head is expected to be a 100hp bolt on improvement over the poor flowing log head. (The 2.3L doesnt have the market cornered on poor flowing factory ports). Also coming are turbo, supercharger, and fuel injection kits.
 

88GeeTee

New Member
Oct 11, 2005
49
0
0
Ft. Lewis, WA
Feb 20, 2006
#8
  • Feb 20, 2006
  • #8
it would have to be a 3.3. the 2.8 was dropped after it's first year, 1979...seems like a good deal, would make a decent daily driver...i say go for it!!

Josh
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
WTB Inline 6 wanted 200 ci
  • Capnkev
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Want to Buy
Replies
1
Views
163
Want to Buy Mar 2, 2026
General karthief
H
Misfire cyl 2 under 3200 RPM, not the coil or injector
  • Hydranmenace
  • Nov 14, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
163
2015 - 2023 Specific Tech Nov 14, 2025
Hydranmenace
H
M
Another Newbie
  • markb
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
177
The Welcome Wagon Dec 7, 2025
markb
M
M
How To Decode
  • Malcoll1
  • Mar 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
240
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 10, 2026
FoxChasis
F
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
735
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?