'86 GT purchase advice?

bbenthin

New Member

Dec 24, 2002

5

0

0

Seattle

Dec 9, 2006

#1

• Dec 9, 2006

• #1

I'm a vintage guy by nature, but am starting to get into Foxes again (had an '87 GT a while back).

I have a line on a cheap '86 GT 5spd car with 130k and some (what appears to be) cosmetic front end damage. It's ugly, but for $700...who cares? I'm still inquiring as to how well it runs, overall drivetrain condition, etc. My plan is to turn this into a dedicated track car.

My question is, are there any red flags to be aware of when looking at an '86?
If there's a comprehensive post already out there on this subject, I apologize for being oblivious to it.

Thanks!

 

M

Mafia Mustang

Member

Sep 17, 2006

111

0

17

Arizona

Dec 9, 2006

#2

• Dec 9, 2006

• #2

The 86 mustang is the first year of fuel injection and they only made that front end for 85 and 86. as a collector car it great. they also have diffrent heads thatn the 87 - 93 I like the 86 mustang it has metal door handles and the others have plastic.

 

bbenthin

New Member

Dec 24, 2002

5

0

0

Seattle

Dec 9, 2006

#3

• Dec 9, 2006

• #3

Any problem areas that could bite me?

 

QUICK91LX

Founding Member

Dec 7, 2001

968

3

39

New Jersey

Dec 9, 2006

#4

• Dec 9, 2006

• #4

rust in front subframe/shock tower bases, front subframe & floorpan rust and damage (rust esp in toe-boards, damage at seat mounts), torque box damage, rust behind door hinges in the A pillar, of course check the extent of colission damage. the heads suck and it has flat top pistons, some say high lift cams cant be used with the stock pistons, others say they have no problems. factory true dual exhaust and 8.8 rear are bonuses. other than that just go over it as you would any other car, if you want to make a track-only car out of it then the typical fox mustang annoyances are of no concern to you...hope this helps

 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell

Mod Dude

Feb 18, 2001

43,224

17,909

224

Massachusetts

Dec 9, 2006

#5

• Dec 9, 2006

• #5

moved to talk

 

P

PJB

New Member

Aug 22, 2006

131

0

0

Rotterdam, NY

Dec 9, 2006

#6

• Dec 9, 2006

• #6

'86-'88 has speed density instead of MAF so you will need to convert it to MAF.

 

bbenthin

New Member

Dec 24, 2002

5

0

0

Seattle

Dec 13, 2006

#7

• Dec 13, 2006

• #7

Need to? I suppose I could carb it, especially since it'd be a track car.
Oh well, a moot point it seems as I can't get a call back.

 

D

Daggar

New Member

Jul 19, 2004

3,902

5

0

Dec 13, 2006

#8

• Dec 13, 2006

• #8

PJB said:

'86-'88 has speed density instead of MAF so you will need to convert it to MAF.

Click to expand...

Not so. A conversion will only be necessary if you intend to run a cam that is not compatable with the SD computer. A conversion will otherwise, gain you nothing.

 

bbenthin

New Member

Dec 24, 2002

5

0

0

Seattle

Dec 13, 2006

#9

• Dec 13, 2006

• #9

Thanks.

How far can you go before this is an issue?
What about upgrading to E7 heads? Can that be done without piston clearance issues?

 

bbenthin

New Member

Dec 24, 2002

5

0

0

Seattle

Dec 27, 2006

#10

• Dec 27, 2006

• #10

Found another one, this time an '85 with no motor/trans for $400.
Some minor damage to the RR quarter, interior sucks, but it'd be going to the dumpster anyway.

This one would be a 7.5" rear end, right?

The missing drive train is more work than I was looking for initially, but the idea of a carbed car appeals to me. At least this guy is quick to respond. My only worry is that once I have found an engine and trans I'm right at $2k anyway and should save myself some hassle.

Thoughts? Ideas? Verbal abuse?

 

Modular2v

Founding Member

Jun 30, 2002

3,222

23

99

oklahoma

Dec 27, 2006

#11

• Dec 27, 2006

• #11

The hell with upgrading to MAF.....if you cant find a cam that fits your wants while still revolving around the speed density world, then throw a carb on it and be done!