• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

9" rear end question (bearing sizes)

  • Thread starter Thread starter pazcarguy
  • Start date Start date Mar 17, 2008
P

pazcarguy

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
65
0
0
Pittsburgh, PA
Mar 17, 2008
#1
  • Mar 17, 2008
  • #1
I just picked up a bare housing with axles from a 58~59 ford (according to drain plug/dimples/ previous owners statement) to fit into my 66 coupe. I also picked up a 28 spline 3.50 traction lok to go into this. I used a pair of calipers and measured the axle shaft and the bearing OD and got the following numbers: 2.832" bearing OD and 1.360" axle shaft diameter. Is this considered a small, medium , or large bearing rear? and being that I don't know "exactly' what it came from, does anyone have valid part numbers or a cross reference for different manufacturers for new bearings and seals? Wanted to freshen it up since it is already apart. Thanks in advance, Brian
 

ultrastang

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
1,092
2
37
Arkansas
Mar 17, 2008
#2
  • Mar 17, 2008
  • #2
The 9-inch rear end you have is the small bearing one. The axle bearings you'll need are p/n RW-207-CCRA.

The axle seal p/n is: 9568.

3rd Member-To-Housing Gasket: p/n RDS-55074

Axle Bearing Retainer Gaskets: p/n 55001 (2 req.)

Flange/Backing Plate Gaskets: p/n 4828 (2 req.)

Pinion Seal: p/n 7044NA

These are O'Reilly part numbers, but most any parts stores should be able to cross reference them.
 

Coleman

New Member
Jan 30, 2004
12
0
0
Lucas, Tx (DFW area)
Mar 22, 2008
#3
  • Mar 22, 2008
  • #3
I have the same rear end and want to install the FORD racing 9" rear disc brake kit. The kit requires the big bearing ends.

Before I pay to have the big bearing ends installed on my housing, I have this question: Will the big bearing fit on the small bearing axles or do I need new axles too?
 
C

chromedog

New Member
Jan 13, 2006
554
0
0
worlds center for speed
Mar 22, 2008
#4
  • Mar 22, 2008
  • #4
the frpp kit is basically an off the shelf explorer setup. the good news is that the crown vic uses the same deal for small bearing axles. ultrastang did a writeup a while back, which covers the swap. iirc,the later police packages came with slotted rotors as a bonus...
 

ultrastang

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
1,092
2
37
Arkansas
Mar 22, 2008
#5
  • Mar 22, 2008
  • #5
chromedog said:
the frpp kit is basically an off the shelf explorer setup. the good news is that the crown vic uses the same deal for small bearing axles. ultrastang did a writeup a while back, which covers the swap. iirc,the later police packages came with slotted rotors as a bonus...
Click to expand...


Chromedog is correct in the fact the Crown Vic brakes are essentially the same as the Explorer setup (caliper and rotor-wise), with the exception that the Crown Vic calipers are flip-flopped on the axle housing (left caliper mounted behind the axle tube, right caliper mounted in front --while Explorer calipers both mount aft of the housing's tubes), and the fact that the C-V caliper anchor brackets (the cast components the calipers mount to), is designed to fit a small bearing housing, whereas the Explorer setup is designed for a large bearing housing.

I have a set of '98 C-V cop car rear discs in my shop. To my knowledge, none of the C-V cop car rear discs from '92-'95, then from '96-2002 had slotted rotors. All the rotors from these year models were of a solid design (just like the '94-'04 SN95 Mustang V6/GT rear discs --although larger in diameter than the SN95 discs).

The one variation that these year models did have was in the C-V police, taxis and station wagons. They came with stainless steel pistons in the rear calipers. All other common C-V civillian models had phenolic (plastic) pistons within the rear calipers. However, the steel pistons are a direct replacement in the calipers that have phenloic pistons.

In the case of the 2003-present C-Vs, the rotors weren't slotted but Ford did go to a ventillated rotor design in (all) these models. However, the biggest limitaton I see with the 2003-up version is that Ford turned the housing end flanges from a common horizontal position to that of a vertical one. This effectively screwed up the ability in this being a simple swap from the newer models to the old small bearing 8- & 9-inch rear end housings we are all fimiliar with.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
565
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
F
For Sale Ford 9” Differential
  • FordFlyer
  • Jan 24, 2024
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
0
Views
722
Drivetrain Parts Jan 24, 2024
FordFlyer
F
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
S
mustang gt rear end/differential rebuild cost vs doing it myself
  • sharpright
  • Nov 4, 2020
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
15K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 22, 2021
Mustang5L5
Progress Thread Dirty Water Racing 89 Notch Project
  • ShedBuiltMS
  • Sep 29, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
64
Views
13K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 28, 2021
Flyboy60
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?