• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

91 Fox Vs 2016 Ecooboost

  • Thread starter Thread starter Blackfox33
  • Start date Start date Feb 11, 2016
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,019
1,615
194
NJ
Feb 12, 2016
#21
  • Feb 12, 2016
  • #21
madmike1157 said:
It's all a matter of numbers really.

Forget published e.t.s for now,..we'll only focus on Those that deal with weight, and power.

Weight and power is how et's are calculated.

The 310 hp figure is fact. So is the 3500lb curb weight.

You have a vert. 3300 pounds are fact. Your power figure is guesstimated since you don't know. It's been offered that you may see 240, let's say 250.

Conventional math at both of your power levels equate to this:

For every 100 lbs weight savings, you'll pick up a .10.

For every 10 hp you'll pick up a .10.

So,..did you figure it out yet?....

You'll gain (2) tenths on dude because you're less portly.
He'll pick up (6) tenths on you because of the power difference.

6-2=4.

Advantage ecoboost.
Click to expand...

While in this case i failed to see that it was a vert (and while i like them, i wouldn't want one again), i have little faith in them in any type of drag race unless pretty heavily modified.

But as far as crunching power to weight numbers, for years foxes have been been defying the power to weight logic.

Using myself for an example, running 13.6 (and i was far from the quickest in my group with basic bolt ons) with no real parts, lets say 215rwhp, the same ecoboost car should have mopped the floor with my timeslip. Not sure if it's the hp or torque curve or what, but the math just doesn't always pan out.
Hell, foxes outran Lt1 vettes pretty much all the time and they likely had the power to weight advantage.

With that said, in this particular case based on it being a vert i'll amend my original assessment that it would be much closer than people thought, it probably won't, lol.
 

89oem

Mustang Master
Dec 18, 2013
1,456
542
144
Feb 12, 2016
#22
  • Feb 12, 2016
  • #22
So all Im seeing is within less than a second, will the turbo boy know to build boost? can the vert get the jump?
who is just a better driver? its apparent neither has track time.

My .02 just do it at a strip not the back streets and post up your time slips...

Vert FTW!
 
D

dgc333

2-1/8" feels smooth and substantial in my hands
Dec 7, 2014
28
4
13
Feb 13, 2016
#23
  • Feb 13, 2016
  • #23
2000xp8 said:
Even the heavily tuned cars (with voided warranty's) only run low 13's high 12's and they are set on kill.
Click to expand...

A stock Ecoboost runs mid to high 13s.

A basic email tune and no other changes from stock will get an Ecoboost to the low 13s. Add an exhaust and intake and they dip into the 12s.

The "set on kill" cars are in the 11s.

I have a 15 Ecoboost with the Performance Package. The PP gives you 3.55 gears in place of 3.31s, larger/wider tires, improved suspension, better brakes, better cooling and more chassis stiffening.

The tune in my car has it at approximately 340 HP and 380 ft-lbs of torque. This is considered Stage 1.


Dave
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Feb 13, 2016
#24
  • Feb 13, 2016
  • #24
dgc333 said:
A stock Ecoboost runs mid to high 13s.

A basic email tune and no other changes from stock will get an Ecoboost to the low 13s. Add an exhaust and intake and they dip into the 12s.

The "set on kill" cars are in the 11s.

I have a 15 Ecoboost with the Performance Package. The PP gives you 3.55 gears in place of 3.31s, larger/wider tires, improved suspension, better brakes, better cooling and more chassis stiffening.

The tune in my car has it at approximately 340 HP and 380 ft-lbs of torque. This is considered Stage 1.


Dave
Click to expand...

And the new 16 ecoboost is 200 pounds lighter than your car too. So......that's another thing.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,019
1,615
194
NJ
Feb 13, 2016
#25
  • Feb 13, 2016
  • #25
dgc333 said:
A stock Ecoboost runs mid to high 13s.

A basic email tune and no other changes from stock will get an Ecoboost to the low 13s. Add an exhaust and intake and they dip into the 12s.

The "set on kill" cars are in the 11s.

I have a 15 Ecoboost with the Performance Package. The PP gives you 3.55 gears in place of 3.31s, larger/wider tires, improved suspension, better brakes, better cooling and more chassis stiffening.

The tune in my car has it at approximately 340 HP and 380 ft-lbs of torque. This is considered Stage 1.


Dave
Click to expand...

I'm well aware of how ecoboost engines respond to mods.
The fact of the matter is, if the car is indeed just a ford performance pack car (which i'll assume since nobody said it was tuned, unless you are the friend that is going to rape him), it's still a mid high 13 car. I'm not knocking the ecoboost, it's quick in stock form, and even quicker modified, but if this race was between on a bolt on coupe with drag radials vs a stock ecoboost on regular tires, i'd take the coupe.
 

FoxMustangLvr

I love my Pimp
SN Certified Technician
Oct 14, 2012
4,968
3,514
204
Spokane, Wa
Feb 13, 2016
#26
  • Feb 13, 2016
  • #26
Ahhh, bench racing at it's finest!
 
Reactions: A5literMan
D

dgc333

2-1/8" feels smooth and substantial in my hands
Dec 7, 2014
28
4
13
Feb 14, 2016
#27
  • Feb 14, 2016
  • #27
madmike1157 said:
And the new 16 ecoboost is 200 pounds lighter than your car too. So......that's another thing.
Click to expand...
15 and 16 Ecoboost weight the same because there are no differences between the two years.

Dave
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Feb 14, 2016
#28
  • Feb 14, 2016
  • #28
dgc333 said:
15 and 16 Ecoboost weight the same because there are no differences between the two years.

Dave
Click to expand...
You're right Dave. I reread the specs. It was a C&D review of the 2015 ecoboost that listed the curb weight as 3657. I'm guessing that they were confusing the weight of the V8 car?
Everything else I read seemed to corroborate the similar weights.
 
B

Blackfox33

New Member
Feb 11, 2016
3
0
1
Feb 14, 2016
#29
  • Feb 14, 2016
  • #29
I have raced my old 04 lightning at the track many times. Ive also raced my old 07 300SRT8 many times. Yet to race the 5.0. The kid I will be running against has yet to ever race at a legit drag strip. I feel the driver mod is greatly in my favor......."It's not how you stand by your car" LOL!
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,779
6,933
214
SW Houston
Feb 15, 2016
#30
  • Feb 15, 2016
  • #30
Im curious to see where this ends up. UPR's 2.3L Ecoboost is in the 11s now with a stock turbo and stock bottom end. That's pretty impressive.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Feb 15, 2016
#31
  • Feb 15, 2016
  • #31
Blackfox33 said:
The kid I will be running against has yet to ever race at a legit drag strip. I feel the driver mod is greatly in my favor......."It's not how you stand by your car" LOL!
Click to expand...

That would be a true statement if it wasn't totally overshadowed by the fact that he's got both launch and traction control working in his favour.

Where the fox owner has to rely on several factors including drivers skill to get away from the line cleanly, this kid only need plant his foot and let the computer take care of the rest to do the same.
 
D

dgc333

2-1/8" feels smooth and substantial in my hands
Dec 7, 2014
28
4
13
Feb 15, 2016
#32
  • Feb 15, 2016
  • #32
No launch control with the Ecoboost.

Dave
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,234
17,920
224
Massachusetts
Feb 16, 2016
#33
  • Feb 16, 2016
  • #33
7991LXnSHO said:
1. So why are we screwing around in such inferior rides?
Click to expand...


Nostalgia? Why do people restore 60's Muscle cars when most make a ton of noise but aren't that much quicker than a Nissan Maxima.



I always say that when/if my time comes to an end with a Fox, I'd get into a new(er) mustang again.
 
Reactions: A5literMan

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Feb 16, 2016
#34
  • Feb 16, 2016
  • #34
I like how the Fox Mustang fits me, and how the computer is not a black box, and is not reporting to OnStar or the insurance company how and where I drive. Such info, especially without knowing why I stepped on it, is no one else's business. Except for ABS and EFI, I am suspicious of any computer in my car. And thanks to Snowden, even this phone is under my suspicion.

I HATE traction control in a Merc I have. A little wheel slip, and it pulls way too much power and causes a big bog. It is enough to have almost caused accidents, and it does not help on icy days when you try to get moving. I want to put a limited slip diff. in it. Then I want to program the traction control system to be off unless the cruse control is on or if I push the button to turn it on.

Good luck in your race. I hope your driving skills make up for the power to weight ratio.
 
Last edited: Feb 16, 2016
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

My 93 4v Fox
  • OffspringChaos
  • Aug 30, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2024
bird_dog0347
Progress Thread Code Gremlins Finally Fixed (Progress Update)
  • sav22rem22
  • Jan 27, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 3, 2021
90sickfox
Buying a mint black interior for a fox restoration is F$#@ing rough!
  • FastDriver
  • Feb 6, 2012
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 7, 2012
bentley429isBAC
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?