984.6gt said:Mustangs were meant to have vertical lights.
That is a lame responce, GT's put Cobra R's on, so they are posing, GT's put Saleen peices on so they are posing too, if every Mustang that has some parts from another car was called a poser 99% of the cars on this site would be "Posers", if you like vertical get them, if you like horizontal, leave them, it is up to the owner, not you or anybody else, I just simply started that Vertical lights have been a tradition for Mustangs ever since they 1st came out. I like them both.Striped5.0 said:5.0 arent ment to pose as 4.6's
984.6gt said:That is a lame responce, GT's put Cobra R's on, so they are posing, GT's put Saleen peices on so they are posing too, if every Mustang that has some parts from another car was called a poser 99% of the cars on this site would be "Posers", if you like vertical get them, if you like horizontal, leave them, it is up to the owner, not you or anybody else, I just simply started that Vertical lights have been a tradition for Mustangs ever since they 1st came out. I like them both.
VIPERn94Five-0 said:i also dont think the 96+ tails are posing either....i just think the 94-95 guys should keep what there is on our cars that sets us apart from the 4.6 guys....Anthony
mustang90 said:anyone have a pic of the 94 harness installed on the 96 taillight?
id personally take the 96-98 cars over the new ones cuz i think the 94-98 body style is the better looking by far....give me a 98 Cobra over a 99+ anyday.....Striped5.0 said:I dident mean it in the sense of trying to convince people its a 4.6, like people do w/ saleen and cobra groud effects and badgeing. What Im saying is I wouldent want people that do know the basics about mustangs pulling up behind me at a light and saying.........Nice 4.6.. If I dident have a 94-95 GT Id skip right to the 99+ GT b/c the 4.6 from 96-98 is my least favorite motor in recent yrs and theres no way Id want someone thinking I had one of them stuffed under my hood.
That is a lame responce, GT's put Cobra R's on, so they are posing, GT's put Saleen peices on so they are posing too, if every Mustang that has some parts from another car was called a poser 99% of the cars on this site would be "Posers", if you like vertical get them, if you like horizontal, leave them, it is up to the owner, not you or anybody else, I just simply started that Vertical lights have been a tradition for Mustangs ever since they 1st came out. I like them both
I see you keep trying to make cuts at the 96-98 and I have to ask why, it is just as fast as a 5.0 from the factory, it looks THE EXACT same, except it came with a nicer 17" wheels, and a better tranny. So what do you hate about them so much? Mine is now running 13.774 with Pullies, Filter, X-Pipe, Mufflers and a Chip some guy GAVE me at the track, I am not trying to start ****, but you show me ONE 94-95 on this board that is running those times with that little amount of mods and stock gears. I doubt there are any, and if there are, they are not much faster than me. And if you are gonna try and say it is becuse the 5.0 has more aftermarket parts I understand, but I can go to a junkyard, find some 99+ Heads, ahve them ported and be pushing damn near 300rwhp for not much money at all, like I said I am not trying to start ****, and I LOVE 94-95 GT's, probrally my favorite Mustang of all time, but why do you talk down on them like they are so horrible. And for anybody trying to turn this into a 4.6 vs. 50 flame fest, please don't, I have NO intentions on starting such an argument, just trying to figure out where this guy is coming from with his comments.Striped5.0 said:I b/c the 4.6 from 96-98 is my least favorite motor in recent yrs and theres no way Id want someone thinking I had one of them stuffed under my hood.
I see you keep trying to make cuts at the 96-98 and I have to ask why, it is just as fast as a 5.0 from the factory, it looks THE EXACT same, except it came with a nicer 17" wheels, and a better tranny. So what do you hate about them so much? Mine is now running 13.774 with Pullies, Filter, X-Pipe, Mufflers and a Chip some guy GAVE me at the track, I am not trying to start ****, but you show me ONE 94-95 on this board that is running those times with that little amount of mods and stock gears. I doubt there are any, and if there are, they are not much faster than me. And if you are gonna try and say it is becuse the 5.0 has more aftermarket parts I understand, but I can go to a junkyard, find some 99+ Heads, ahve them ported and be pushing damn near 300rwhp for not much money at all, like I said I am not trying to start ****, and I LOVE 94-95 GT's, probrally mt favorite Mustang of all time, but why do you talk down on them like they are so horrible.
I did, but about a year ago my old motor failed on me due to nitrous, so I went to a junkyard and found another 98 motor with a rear and tranny for $800. They had just over 28k on them, so I decided to swap them out at the same time I put the new motor in, but the guys at the dealership wanted another $400 to take the 4.10's out and put them in the new rear, so in a way I got screwed, I also had FMS Shortie Headers on the old motor too, but they would not put those on either. I still have the parts in my garage, and plan to re-install them. But I am HAPPY right now considering I am running faster than I did with them, without them. Here is a copy of the timeslip just in case anybody DOES have doubts.yellow1995Cobra said:Im not doubting your times, but i thought on ur old "sig" it said you had 4.10 gears
I did, but about a year ago my old motor failed on me due to nitrous, so I went to a junkyard and found another 98 motor with a rear and tranny for $800. They had just over 28k on them, so I decided to swap them out at the same time I put the new motor in, but the guys at the dealership wanted another $400 to take the 4.10's out and put them in the new rear, so in a way I got screwed, I also had FMS Shortie Headers on the old motor too, but they would not put those on either. I still have the parts in my garage, and plan to re-install them. But I am HAPPY right now considering I am running faster than I did with them, without them. Here is a copy of the timeslip just in case anybody DOES have doubts.
VIPERn94Five-0 said:id personally take the 96-98 cars over the new ones cuz i think the 94-98 body style is the better looking by far....give me a 98 Cobra over a 99+ anyday.....
Anthony
Why, they are not that different thatn 94-95 GT's, Both look IDENTICAL, so it is not looks you don't like, both dyno high 190's low 200's stock so it can't be power, both can make about 300rwhp for about $3,000( Heads, Cams, Longtubes) so what is it you guys hate so much about them. Again I am not flaming, just wondering. The only thing is that the 5.0 can make a little more power using bolt-ons then the 96-98's can. But that is not by much AT ALL. They both sound great, some say the 302 sounds better, and some say the Mod Motor produces a more aggresive tone, but both sides agree they both soud great. So what is it guys, I have a buddy with a set up similar to yours RC except using the 4.6L, he has ported PI heads, and a Bullit Intake, and a Vortech S-Trim@10psi, he is making just over 430rwhp and spent about $5000. How much power do you make? And how much did you spend? I am honestly wondering, not trying to argue. I guess I give up, I can't figure out why you guys hate the 4.6L so much, but oh well, I love you cars, they are the original SN95, but both are nice cars in my mind.94GTLaserRC said:The 96-97 GT's were
IRC
984.6gt said:Why, they are not that different than 94-95 GT's, .... not trying to argue. I guess I give up, .
984.6gt said:..... I am not trying to start ****, .... like I said I am not trying to start ****,
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?