• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

94/94 TO 96/98 Taillight Conversion ???

  • Thread starter Thread starter mustang90
  • Start date Start date Dec 21, 2003
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last

984.6gt

Founding Member
Jul 10, 2002
2,806
0
46
Sugar Land
Dec 22, 2003
#41
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #41
94GTLaserRC said:
Not trying to argue???...That is the biggest crock of I have ever heard.!!

You are ALWAYS coming into this forum and starting arguments with everyone. There is not a thread on here with a post from you that is starting some $hit!

Youre comparing my <A TITLE="Click for more information about car" STYLE="text-decoration: none; border-bottom: medium solid green;" HREF="http://search.targetwords.com/u.search?x=5977|1||||cars|AA1VDw">car</A> to someone's 96/97, power and price? You can make ANY car go fast...What my statement referred to is the STOCK 96/97's being the prototype Ford BS blunder 4.6 engine, not the look of the car, the whole car itself. They improved them in 98, and are now pretty decent motors...that's all.

RC
Click to expand...
Actually it always goes about like this, I come here and state my OPINION, and sombody like you trys to start **** like you just did by saying I am always here starting ****, which is false. I have over 2600 posts on this board and have had no problems with anybody except in this section, and I still don't know why, like I said in my 3 other posts on this thread I AM NOT TRYING TO START ****, I praise your cars, say how much I love them, yet I am trying to start ****, well how you come up with that idea is beyond me, and all 96-98 GT's are the same, I don't know why you think there is somthing different about the 98, the only difference is 10HP that they CLAIMED, but never showed up on dyno charts. Saying the 96-98 GT's are no good compared to the 99+ GT's is just like saying the 94-95 GT's are no good compared to the 94-95 Cobra, the only difference is the the Heads, Cam, and Intake, same block. Oh Well, with people like you always trying to fight with me I really have no chance, soon all your buddies will come and start saying how I am a troll and so on, just like every other time I post here.
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says &quot;here it comes... dushbag&quot;
Dec 22, 2003
#42
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #42
Let's see....

a. ALL OF THE GUYS IN THIS FORUM START $HIT WITH YOU.

b. It is YOU starting the $hit?

I think that shows where the issue is. I dont go into other threads and knock the guys in there. If I HATE other stangs, I will say it here in MY OWN forum. I dont go into THEIR forums and say it. And Im not asking for help of my "buddies".

I am very courteous and respectful in other forums and very careful what I say there. Here I am more comfortable with my "buddies" and am a bit more free. I have earned the respect of a lot of guys here, but ZERO in the other forums, because they do NOT know me.

If you feel you have to say "Im not trying to start $hit" then obviously you think you must be, or you wouldnt have to preface with that phrase.
RC
 

huskerpower02

Member
Aug 21, 2003
770
0
16
KS
Dec 22, 2003
#43
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #43
Im with ya RC, lets try to "polish" this one up. oh boy, i made a funny But seriously, i got nothin against the 4.6. LET EVERYONE BE HAPPY!
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says &quot;here it comes... dushbag&quot;
Dec 22, 2003
#44
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #44
When you say "RC", Say "polish" (or "chrome")
RC
 

984.6gt

Founding Member
Jul 10, 2002
2,806
0
46
Sugar Land
Dec 22, 2003
#45
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #45
94GTLaserRC said:
Let's see....


If you feel you have to say "Im not trying to start $hit" then obviously you think you must be, or you wouldnt have to preface with that phrase.
RC
Click to expand...
Actually me saying "I am not trying to start ****" was my way of TRYING to prevent THIS from happening, but no way big bad RC could let that happen, I mean **** this is his internet turf. For me to ask why sombody does not like the 96-98 GT is UNHERAD of. You are right, me asking why he did not like the 98 GT's is WAY OUT OF LINE, I am glad I am not caught doing this in public, I might be hung.
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says &quot;here it comes... dushbag&quot;
Dec 22, 2003
#46
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #46
984.6gt said:
Actually me saying "I am not trying to start ****" was my way of TRYING to prevent THIS from happening, but no way big bad RC could let that happen, I mean **** this is his internet turf. For me to ask why sombody does not like the 96-98 GT is UNHERAD of. You are right, me asking why he did not like the 98 GT's is WAY OUT OF LINE, I am glad I am not caught doing this in public, I might be hung.
Click to expand...


Read my post above yours, then read yours..

Am I the only one around here that thinks you JUST DONT GET IT??

I put a and you put a "this is his internet turf".

Youre not even trying!
RC
 

huskerpower02

Member
Aug 21, 2003
770
0
16
KS
Dec 22, 2003
#47
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #47
The Almighty MR. Polished RC As for 984.6gt, welcome to the Untied States of Chrome. Dictated by RC. Now please either this or lets try to get it back on topic.
 
Y

yellow1995Cobra

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
2,959
2
0
Massachusetts
Dec 22, 2003
#48
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #48
welcome to the Untied States of Chrome. Dictated by RC.
Click to expand...


 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says &quot;here it comes... dushbag&quot;
Dec 22, 2003
#49
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #49
yellow1995Cobra said:
Click to expand...


Yes, , but not helping our cause here...Trying to get along, not antagonize!
RC
 

huskerpower02

Member
Aug 21, 2003
770
0
16
KS
Dec 22, 2003
#50
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #50
Ok, trying to get back on topic. There are a few occasions where i like the look of the vertical tailights on a 94 or 95. Theres a yellow one around here with saleen wheels and i thought it was for sale for awhile Anyway, that looked bada$$. I will always stick with my horizontals but if you like the look, tell all of us to screw off and go do it! If you like it enough, **** man, its your car. Do to it as you will, but please, for the love of God, no big spoilers
 
Y

yellow1995Cobra

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
2,959
2
0
Massachusetts
Dec 22, 2003
#51
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #51
im not antagonizing, i just thought it was a funny statement, we need some humor in this thread
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Dec 22, 2003
#52
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #52
double post.
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Dec 22, 2003
#53
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #53
984.6gt said:
I see you keep trying to make cuts at the 96-98 and I have to ask why, it is just as fast as a 5.0 from the factory.
Click to expand...



Haha, yeah ok, Ive seen 98's on the dynos that pulled less HP then me w/ more mods or equal mods, The quote is the only thing I read from your post b/c just from that I dont care to much else of what you have to say......go back to 4.6 talk. No way a stock 96 is equal to a stock 95, just not going to happen
 

huskerpower02

Member
Aug 21, 2003
770
0
16
KS
Dec 22, 2003
#54
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #54
Striped5.0 said:
Haha, yeah ok, Ive seen 98's on the dynos that pulled less HP then me w/ more mods or equal mods, The quote is the only thing I read from your post b/c just from that I dont care to much else of what you have to say......go back to 4.6 talk. No way a stock 96 is equal to a stock 95, just not going to happen
Click to expand...

Ya, i wanted to pull the on that one too but i didnt want to be the only one to get :damnit: :OT:
 

huskerpower02

Member
Aug 21, 2003
770
0
16
KS
Dec 22, 2003
#55
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #55
but seriously, does anyone know of that 94-95 mustang with the saleen wheels. its a picture showing the left side of the car shot from the tail lights.
 

984.6gt

Founding Member
Jul 10, 2002
2,806
0
46
Sugar Land
Dec 22, 2003
#56
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #56
My car ran 14.624@95.xx bone stock, I don't know what you 94-95 guys do, but I can't see it being much better than that, I will admitt, there are ALOT of slow ass 96-98 GT's, mosty automatics, or 5-Speeds where guys try to take these BS heads we have to 6,000RPMs, if you can drive, and shift at just over 5k, you should be able to make a 96-98 GT go mid to high 14's stock with no problems, if I had to give an advantage to either one, it would be the 94-95, but we are talking like a 5 HP difference, they make almost identical power stock, just under 200HP, and about 270TQ, the 5.0 might make a bit more TQ, but nothing major. I am done discussing this, how am I supposed to NOT argue with you guys when you call be a "$hit starter and make cuts at my car, it is just a lose lose situaition for me, and I tried to be civil too, that is the sad thing, I said I loved your cars, ect ect, and still got flamed by you guys.
 

Henceforward

The Avatar Master
Founding Member
Jul 17, 2001
485
0
0
Dec 22, 2003
#57
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #57
Here's an idea...

You could be different and get export tail lights...



http://karkraft.com/94-98_mustang.htm

$229.95 a pair.

Or vertical export "Cobra" tail lights...



Just an Idea.
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Dec 22, 2003
#58
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #58
984.6gt said:
My car ran 14.624@95.xx bone stock.
Click to expand...


YaY, Yippie

you may have had good times w/ your but you cant speak for ALL 4.6's out there. Dosent change the fact that the 96-98 was a sorry motor for the Mustang, plus there more expensive to mod, and theres not as much parts for them as a 5.0 and I just dont like them In general until they got to 99+ GT's. From owning a 5.0 and seeing the piles and piles of mags w/ parts for them theres no way I'll ever own a 4.6

Just my .02

plus the rear lights on a 94-95 look bad ass at night. Had a LT1 guy tell me once that even though he had a camaro my Stang look mean as hell from the back at night time.
 

huskerpower02

Member
Aug 21, 2003
770
0
16
KS
Dec 22, 2003
#59
  • Dec 22, 2003
  • #59
Henceforward said:
You could be different and get export tail lights...



http://karkraft.com/94-98_mustang.htm

$229.95 a pair.

Or vertical export "Cobra" tail lights...



Just an Idea.
Click to expand...

ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh i like!
 

huskerpower02

Member
Aug 21, 2003
770
0
16
KS
Dec 23, 2003
#60
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #60
Heres the yellow one i was talking about

 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Taillight upgrade?
  • BeardIsRed
  • Feb 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
327
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 5, 2026
rednotch
D
96 get convertible-sell or part out?
  • DTCstang
  • May 17, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
5
Views
144
What is it Worth?!?!? May 18, 2026
nickyb
M
94 Mustang gt throttle body
  • Mike3
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
399
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Sep 2, 2025
revhead347
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
723
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
M
Need help!
  • Masonevans726
  • Dec 17, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
242
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Dec 17, 2025
Masonevans726
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?