94 GT vs. 00 GT

donsbad68

Immensely Educated

Jan 4, 2003

838

0

0

Oklahoma

Jun 15, 2005

#1

• Jun 15, 2005

• #1

1994 GT vert, auto- 65mm TB, K&N, Flowmaster cat-back, pulleys, no smog, h-pipe, BBK equal lengths, 155lph pump, 3.27 gears, bumped timing.

2000 GT - auto, K&N otherwise stock.

Who wins in the quarter? Based on equal drivers?

 

M

MadHandle8169

Founding Member

May 5, 2002

432

0

0

Brick, NJ

Jun 15, 2005

#2

• Jun 15, 2005

• #2

It will be really close. If I had to guess I would say the 2000 GT cuz the 94 is a Vert.

I run dead even with my friends 2000 GT with K&N and Exhaust. We are also 5 Speeds though.

 

Swarzkopf

Member

Sep 23, 2004

973

0

16

Pittsburgh

Jun 15, 2005

#3

• Jun 15, 2005

• #3

The 2000 GT will crush the 1994 GT convertible.

The 2000 GT could run 14.5 or so, the 94 GT is going to STRUGGLE HARD for 14s.

 

9

95.0Stang

Member

Feb 20, 2003

538

1

18

Kansas

Jun 15, 2005

#4

• Jun 15, 2005

• #4

2000 GT without a doubt.

 

CManT1914

New Member

Feb 5, 2004

3,172

2

0

Killeen, Texas

Jun 15, 2005

#5

• Jun 15, 2005

• #5

donsbad68 said:

1994 GT vert, auto- 65mm TB, K&N, Flowmaster cat-back, pulleys, no smog, h-pipe, BBK equal lengths, 155lph pump, 3.27 gears, bumped timing.

2000 GT - auto, K&N otherwise stock.

Who wins in the quarter? Based on equal drivers?

Click to expand...

The 2000 should beat the 94 pretty easily. The 94 is an auto vert (and while I don't believe being a vert makes a HUGE difference, it's good for a couple tenths unfortunately ) and the 94 has no real mods. 2000 should have it.

 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"

Founding Member

Aug 7, 2002

9,516

6

99

Arkansas

Jun 15, 2005

#6

• Jun 15, 2005

• #6

Assuming equal drivers...the 2000 GT will walk away...

They can run low 14's (a select few with good drivers/conditions hit high 13's) and they trap 97-99mph...

 

BlackVert

15 Year Member

Oct 3, 2003

5,589

9

98

Bethesda, MD

Jun 15, 2005

#7

• Jun 15, 2005

• #7

how about a 94 vert with ported heads, trick flow intake, equal length shorty headers, pulleys, 70mm t/b and 80mm maf?

 

CManT1914

New Member

Feb 5, 2004

3,172

2

0

Killeen, Texas

Jun 15, 2005

#8

• Jun 15, 2005

• #8

BlackVert said:

how about a 94 vert with ported heads, trick flow intake, equal length shorty headers, pulleys, 70mm t/b and 80mm maf?

Click to expand...

5spd or auto? I ran a lot of 14.2's with my intake, TB, h-pipe, and gears. With ported heads you should be able to take a mostly stock 99+ stang.

 

BlackVert

15 Year Member

Oct 3, 2003

5,589

9

98

Bethesda, MD

Jun 15, 2005

#9

• Jun 15, 2005

• #9

CManT1914 said:

5spd or auto? I ran a lot of 14.2's with my intake, TB, h-pipe, and gears. With ported heads you should be able to take a mostly stock 99+ stang.

Click to expand...

manual

 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"

Founding Member

Aug 7, 2002

9,516

6

99

Arkansas

Jun 15, 2005

#10

• Jun 15, 2005

• #10

BlackVert - If the 94 vert driver can drive I give it to him...

 

N

Nobody

Founding Member

May 9, 2000

2,515

0

0

Kenmore, WA

Jun 15, 2005

#11

• Jun 15, 2005

• #11

The 2000 GT will win even if it was towing a '94 Gt behind it.

 

94MustangGT5.0

New Member

Apr 30, 2003

288

0

0

Champaign, Illinois

Jun 16, 2005

#12

• Jun 16, 2005

• #12

Also, the AODE (4R70W) that came with a 2000 GT had a much lower first gear than our AODE's. He will probably take you off the line pretty bad and from there it will be over. My car can hang with my buddies 99 GT 5-speed pretty good from a roll, but on the top end and down low (5 speed vs. auto) he smokes me. Those 99+ 4.6's really come around after 3500 RPM's too.

 

FastFord

Founding Member

Sep 5, 2002

380

0

0

Washington

Jun 16, 2005

#13

• Jun 16, 2005

• #13

I'd have to side with the 2000 for the reasons sited above....

 

Scott_95GT

New Member

Oct 8, 2004

387

0

0

Sacramento

Jun 16, 2005

#14

• Jun 16, 2005

• #14

I raced my friend's auto 99 GT (cat-back and a CAI) from a 30 mph roll to about 80mph.

We started dead even, and ended with the nose of his car about 2-3 feet out front. When our cars first down shifted, I took a slight jump (transgo kit vs. stock) and we pretty much stayed door-to-door, ending with him out front by a couple feet. He should have had me by at least a 1/2 car length, so I thought I did good against him.

Since your car is a vert, I don't think you'll do as well. Stock gear/motor aode vert's are dogs. They run mid-15's. The vert is gonna need more to beat him.

 

donsbad68

Immensely Educated

Jan 4, 2003

838

0

0

Oklahoma

Jun 17, 2005

#15

• Jun 17, 2005

• #15

Here's the results:

4.6 = teh win

14.62 @95 vs. 15.35 @92

 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples

May 29, 2004

2,878

1

0

Davenport, IA

Jun 17, 2005

#16

• Jun 17, 2005

• #16

donsbad68 said:

Here's the results:

4.6 = teh win

14.62 @95 vs. 15.35 @92

Click to expand...

the guy in the 00 needs practice

 

CManT1914

New Member

Feb 5, 2004

3,172

2

0

Killeen, Texas

Jun 17, 2005

#17

• Jun 17, 2005

• #17

donsbad68 said:

Here's the results:

4.6 = teh win

14.62 @95 vs. 15.35 @92

Click to expand...

Wow!! Somebody actually came back and posted the results of the race!! lol, that's rare here.

 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples

May 29, 2004

2,878

1

0

Davenport, IA

Jun 17, 2005

#18

• Jun 17, 2005

• #18

CManT1914 said:

Wow!! Somebody actually came back and posted the results of the race!! lol, that's rare here.

Click to expand...

thats what i was thinking too

 

donsbad68

Immensely Educated

Jan 4, 2003

838

0

0

Oklahoma

Jun 18, 2005

#19

• Jun 18, 2005

• #19

hey i gotta come thru for the fellow stangers

 

Venom351R

Founding Member

Apr 27, 2002

4,548

41

98

MAINE

Jun 18, 2005

#20

• Jun 18, 2005

• #20

Thats one of the main reasons I dont reply to the VS threads anymore b/c no one ever tells us what happend after. Especially if there a noob and just get on here to ask that question. Thanks for the results though