• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

96-98 GT Header Installation

  • Thread starter Thread starter notchSTANG8890
  • Start date Start date Oct 25, 2004
N

notchSTANG8890

New Member
Oct 25, 2004
4
0
0
PHILADELPHIA AREA
Oct 25, 2004
#1
  • Oct 25, 2004
  • #1
I've been a fox body guy since I've gotten my liscense. Had two Gt's and currently own a notch which I'm selling this week and buying a 96gt. I know the fox body like the back of my hand, but I'm not too familiar with the 4.6...I'd like to add full exhaust, but a friend of mine said it took him many hours and he had to jack up the motor to install them, basically said it wasn't worth it. Is it a hard install? Please keep in mind I have access to a lift and air tools. Also I'd like any suggestions for exhaust combo's...
 

chevyboy_z28

New Member
Jan 1, 2004
66
0
0
Wixom, MI
Oct 25, 2004
#2
  • Oct 25, 2004
  • #2
u seem better off than i was already b/c u have access to good tools. i did the full exhaust swap in my backyard with only jackstands, basic handtools, and PBlaster penetrant. honestly its not that hard if you go about doing it correctly. from my experience ide say its impossible w/o jacking the motor up and dropping the k-member, as well as simply disconnecting the steering linkage (no need to remove). if you do these things then you shouldnt have any problems and it could turn out to be a one day job. i was fore-warned about having to drop the k-frame but tried to cheat around it (wasting a day), but i (we) still completed the whole job in one weekend. as for the rest of the exhaust it was easy as pie. installing the prochamber to the headers took roughly 15 mins, mufflers to prochamber 15 mins. ive heard that different headers may require different methods of installation, but im pretty sure that all longtubes (bbk, mac, kooks, hooker, etc) go on the same. good luck with youre swap youll be impressed in the end.
 

TweekedGT

New Member
Jul 22, 2004
1,274
0
0
Alberta
Oct 25, 2004
#3
  • Oct 25, 2004
  • #3
Yup. You're going to have to jack the motor. Mine were a real pain. My passenger side header still bangs just a little in my engine bay on start up. it is really tight on the starter too. It took roughly 10 hours to get the thing done right and that was with a hoist. Good luck. If you have freakishly small hands that will help. Think of borrowing a midget from the circus. I would do it again though. It was definitly worth it.
 
N

notchSTANG8890

New Member
Oct 25, 2004
4
0
0
PHILADELPHIA AREA
Oct 29, 2004
#4
  • Oct 29, 2004
  • #4
I'm not looking for excessive power gains with the headers. Just looking for that clean hollow sound...could I get that with maybe just a bassani x-pipe and a catback and leaving the stock headers for now??
 

reeber

10 Year Member
Mar 10, 2004
574
26
38
Berlin, NJ
Oct 30, 2004
#5
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #5
You definately don't have to jack the motor... Drop the K-Member.. that is the only thing that will get in your way.. If you do that, header removal / install will be cake...
 
0

007

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2002
3,287
24
69
Broke
Oct 30, 2004
#6
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #6
The heads on your car are total crap. You probably want to do a PI headswap first (99+ heads), and just get a cat back and midpipe to save cash/effort. The non-pi heads will really hold back your car, and its hard to get decent power without changing them. They will give your car a dramatic hp improvement, and itll run with 99+ GTs (260hp) with no other changes. You wont get anywhere near the same from full exhaust.

Anyway, if I were you, I'd do a mid-pipe, then get some ported PI heads and cams. With a tune your car will make really nice power. Add a catback and itll sound nasty with the cams too!
 

BossShinoda9701

New Member
Oct 16, 2004
52
0
0
Colorado
Oct 30, 2004
#7
  • Oct 30, 2004
  • #7
Yeah headers are a PITA!! just finished mine today. (BBK Equal Tuned)

I didnt drop the kmember, just loosened steering shaft, took motor mounts and starter out and jacked up the engine then pry it over to the opposite side I was working on. Lift would help out A LOT. The tool I used the most was a shortie(4" or so long) 1/2" box/open wrench and a ratcheting wrench.

You might want to check the motor mounts, (have 80k) I had to wait 4 days from Ford to get mine and they only shipped one and had to wait another day for the other one. Mine were starting to wear metal on metal


As for combos, I like bassani the best (actual "sound" comes from mufflers) but I have BBK Equal Tuned Headers, BBK X pipe, Airflow I Mufflers, and etc.

I would do either shorties or long tubes, X, Flow 40s

The headers I put on didn't really make it lounder, its just really low and hollow now. sounds like a 5.0 until you hit high rpms

I like the idea of heads...you could p/p them (guy at speed shop said guys are running below 10s with these heads, just port and polished )
You can do cams also.
 

LI98GTStang

Founding Member
Jun 22, 2000
1,715
0
36
L.I., NY
Oct 31, 2004
#8
  • Oct 31, 2004
  • #8
007 said:
The heads on your car are total crap. You probably want to do a PI headswap first (99+ heads), and just get a cat back and midpipe to save cash/effort. The non-pi heads will really hold back your car, and its hard to get decent power without changing them. They will give your car a dramatic hp improvement, and itll run with 99+ GTs (260hp) with no other changes. You wont get anywhere near the same from full exhaust.

Anyway, if I were you, I'd do a mid-pipe, then get some ported PI heads and cams. With a tune your car will make really nice power. Add a catback and itll sound nasty with the cams too!
Click to expand...

As far as hp/tq goes, there are many threads on NPI/PI, so I don't want to take this thread down that road since you are going for sound - but with my stock unported NPI heads (with PI cams), I last dyno'd with very similiar numbers as 007 with his PI heads: 229 rwhp and 276.7 rwtq.

Since most of the sound comes from mufflers, shorties do seem like a lot of trouble to go through for the incremental tones, but I can see it being worth it if you couple with a K-member change. Lighter weight and will have access to do the headers at the same time. Maybe look into some Spin Techs?
 
0

007

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2002
3,287
24
69
Broke
Oct 31, 2004
#9
  • Oct 31, 2004
  • #9
LI98GTStang said:
As far as hp/tq goes, there are many threads on NPI/PI, so I don't want to take this thread down that road since you are going for sound - but with my stock unported NPI heads (with PI cams), I last dyno'd with very similiar numbers as 007 with his PI heads: 229 rwhp and 276.7 rwtq.

Since most of the sound comes from mufflers, shorties do seem like a lot of trouble to go through for the incremental tones, but I can see it being worth it if you couple with a K-member change. Lighter weight and will have access to do the headers at the same time. Maybe look into some Spin Techs?
Click to expand...

Remember you have a 5 speed and I have an auto tho. My car with a 5 speed would dyno 245-250rwhp.
I dont really understand why you would do PI cam swap and not the heads. The non PIs are total crap. Everyone knows that. Why not buy a set of more aggresive cams anyway (e.g. VT stage 1)?

As I said before, ported PI heads, and some nice cams is the way to go IMO.
 

LI98GTStang

Founding Member
Jun 22, 2000
1,715
0
36
L.I., NY
Nov 10, 2004
#10
  • Nov 10, 2004
  • #10
007 said:
Remember you have a 5 speed and I have an auto tho. My car with a 5 speed would dyno 245-250rwhp.
I dont really understand why you would do PI cam swap and not the heads. The non PIs are total crap. Everyone knows that. Why not buy a set of more aggresive cams anyway (e.g. VT stage 1)?

As I said before, ported PI heads, and some nice cams is the way to go IMO.
Click to expand...

The reason I went with the PI cams was that they were documented as having gains, were cost effective compared to more agressive cams and also allowed me to stay with the stock valve springs (another additional cost of agressive cams). I could also handle the job of changing the cams more easily compared to PI heads or 3rd party cams and springs.
I'll point you guys checking this thread out to here as this NPI/PI has been argued and documented before....... And point taken that I do have a 5sp, but compared to your setup, my car doesn't have a chip or T/A so I am at stock timing leaving some hp/tq behind.

http://forums.modulardepot.com/showthread.php?threadid=2634
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
659
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
290
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
729
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
L
Drivetrain 2000 GT High Idle - Pulling Out Hair - Help
  • lleonard1185
  • Jan 18, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
563
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 4, 2025
Leo090
L
What's your tow rig?
  • LILCBRA
  • May 31, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
75
Other Auto Tech May 31, 2026
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?