• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

99 to 04 which to buy today? HELP ASAP PLEASE

  • Thread starter Thread starter stangwar84
  • Start date Start date Apr 26, 2008
S

stangwar84

New Member
Dec 7, 2007
2
0
0
Apr 26, 2008
#1
  • Apr 26, 2008
  • #1
Hey guys...Hope everyone is doing well. I sold my 01 blown v6 swap car 700hp and I am really sad. Im going out to get a GT today and I want to know what year you think I should get. 99 00 01 02 03 or 04?

I dropped one in the v6 swap so I know mid 01 cars have the T3650. Why so much better than 99 00? What production date has the T3650.

which years have the cracking intake issue? Thanks

help
 
S

stangwar84

New Member
Dec 7, 2007
2
0
0
Apr 26, 2008
#2
  • Apr 26, 2008
  • #2
please
 
S

SilverBullet00

New Member
Jul 5, 2004
1,150
0
0
Wichita, KS
Apr 26, 2008
#3
  • Apr 26, 2008
  • #3
99-00 have the cracking issue, not a huge deal. Between the 3650 and the T45, it just depends on prefference. I LOVED my T45, and I think it was night and day better than my crappy 3650. A lot of it has to do with how the previous owner drove it.

I would say get an 02+ because they have the single head unit CD player and better wheels... but it depends what you can find.
 

mustang50v8

Member
Feb 4, 2003
548
3
18
847 Chicago Burbs
Apr 26, 2008
#4
  • Apr 26, 2008
  • #4
so you had a v6 stang with 700hp?

but of all the years of gt's i would go with a 2001 cobra. i wish i could have found one before i got my gt.
 

BurningRubber

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2004
1,865
24
58
Apr 26, 2008
#5
  • Apr 26, 2008
  • #5
99-04 are all reliable, except for the intake manifold problem from 99-mid 01.

Personally I like my T-45, T-3650's are a crap shoot to wether or not they will work fine or pleauge you will issues. Not to scare you off, as many do not have problems... but compare the number of issues and the 3650 is more problematic IMO.


99-00's dont have a hood, or side scoops that stick out. They also have a different (better looking IMO) wing on them.

99-00's also had the Windsor 4.6, not the Romeo that the 01+ GT's have. Some power and whatnot, parts interchangable but it will take a few extra steps to swap parts between the two rather than a Windsor/Windsor or Romeo/Romeo swap.

Cant go wrong with any year IMO as long as the car is in good shape.
 

Black_02_GT

Member
Mar 2, 2008
0
0
16
Mississippi
Apr 26, 2008
#6
  • Apr 26, 2008
  • #6
and if it appeals to you in any way at all consider the 99 is 35th anniv. and 04 is 40th anniv. some people might like that
 

scupking

Active Member
Sep 18, 2005
1,186
1
36
Enfield, CT
Apr 26, 2008
#7
  • Apr 26, 2008
  • #7
2001 was the last change for the SN95. They add the hood scope, side scoop, new wing, smoked headlights, changed the center console cup holder location, changed the CD player layout. Basically 01-04 looked exactly a like.
 

Mossberg

Active Member
Jul 21, 2003
0
1
36
ATL, Shawty
Apr 26, 2008
#8
  • Apr 26, 2008
  • #8
I prefer the 01-04 styling better. I hate the non-smoked headlamps and the 99-00 spoiler. It seems like they just slapped a fox type spoiler on those years and mounted them way too far forward.

2001 was the first year I considered buying a new edge because of this.

Plus, the double DIN center console > two single DIN center console
 
S

stangwar84

New Member
Dec 7, 2007
2
0
0
Apr 26, 2008
#9
  • Apr 26, 2008
  • #9
You all kick ***. Thank you so much for the help. Oh and the v6 thing....it started as a v6 but I swapped in a 4.6 from a 00 with manley pistons, rods, cobra crank etc. T3650 with a dual friction (no issues on that one, not sure if I want it again though) 24 psi from a vortech through an air to air paxton. 8.8 w/3.90. Ya know the rest...cobra pumps, maf, boost a pump, injectors, crudd load of tuning...bottom line I had a 9 sec stang but it was a huge waste of money. Starting with a 6 and makin it run is 10k more than startin with a gt. AND YES i DID BLOW THE DARN THING UP ONCE AND I BUILT IT AGAIN. Well here I go again.....IM CLEARLY BEING USED AND ABUSED BY THE STANG BUG. Thanks
 
S

stangwar84

New Member
Dec 7, 2007
2
0
0
Apr 26, 2008
#10
  • Apr 26, 2008
  • #10
I PUSHED IT TILL TOMORROW....ILL LET YOU KNOW. I THINK AN 01
 

geoffsgt

Member
Aug 7, 2005
176
1
16
Baton Rouge, LA
Apr 27, 2008
#11
  • Apr 27, 2008
  • #11
You already took a 2V about as far as most people will take it, I would try out a 4V this time.
 

mustang50v8

Member
Feb 4, 2003
548
3
18
847 Chicago Burbs
Apr 27, 2008
#12
  • Apr 27, 2008
  • #12
well i have to ask what kind of budget you are working with and where do you live?

i will be working today, so i will be sitting at my computer all day and i would be more that happy to look at the auto sales sites.




and also as i said in my last post i would defenetly go the 99-01 cobra route, unless you have more money for a 03-04 cobra. or an 03-04 mach1
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
748
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
656
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
For Sale Borg Warner WC T5, Stock Bell Housing, RAM Clutch Set, Double Hump Cross Member, & Pro 5.0 Shifter
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 9, 2025
  • Drivetrain Parts
Replies
1
Views
628
Drivetrain Parts Dec 26, 2025
AeroCoupe
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
772
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?