• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

a couple of questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter triostang
  • Start date Start date Dec 28, 2003

triostang

New Member
Dec 24, 2003
142
0
0
Dec 28, 2003
#1
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #1
what is an fmx automatic transmission?is there a difference?

and the 347 stroker kits are said to be a ticking time bomb since you dont know how long it'll last but theres this kit that made it so it wouldnt have the same problems with the pistons and all. do any of you know wich kit im talking about?
 

charlies

New Member
Apr 30, 2002
390
0
0
in front of computer
Dec 28, 2003
#2
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #2
triostang said:
what is an fmx automatic transmission?is there a difference?
Click to expand...


yes, the fmx is a transmission with an aluminum bellhousing while a banana is a fruit, yellow and perishable.
 

triostang

New Member
Dec 24, 2003
142
0
0
Dec 28, 2003
#3
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #3
so...its good or bad?
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 28, 2003
#4
  • Dec 28, 2003
  • #4
The FMX is the grand daddy of the AOD. It's a late 50's design ( not sure on exactly when) thats stronger than a C-4 and about on a par with the C-6. Back in the late 60's to mid 70's they were the transmission of choice with hot small blocks. They're still good ones and almost bullit proof, but the aftermarket has left them behind.
 

triostang

New Member
Dec 24, 2003
142
0
0
Dec 29, 2003
#5
  • Dec 29, 2003
  • #5
thanx for the information
i appreciate it
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Dec 29, 2003
#6
  • Dec 29, 2003
  • #6
The FMX was an early 70's experiment from Ford, hence the name, FMX,(Ford Motors Experimental). There is virtually no aftermarket support and it is a very heavy transmission. The C4 can easily be built to outlast and outperform it at a far lighter weight.
As far as 347's go, only buy a kit or engine that has the oil control ring, ( the bottom ring), below the groove in the piston that holds the ring. Many early and lesser kits had the oil ring intersecting this groove which caused oil consumption, weak ring longevity, and contaminated oil. The rod ratio was also not that good but later kits have solved these problems with shorter, stronger pistons and better rod ratios. Coast High Performance is a good place to talk to.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 29, 2003
#7
  • Dec 29, 2003
  • #7
If the FMX was an early 70's transmission, then how come the 63 Merc sittin out in my back yard has one in it?
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Dec 29, 2003
#8
  • Dec 29, 2003
  • #8
I think you may be referring to a problem some 347s have with burning oil???

The kit I think you are talking about is from probe. its not really a kit though. The oil ring on the piston is relocated so it does not burn oil. A properly built 347 is, in no way, a ticking time bomb.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
651
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
932
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
9K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Motor given to me and I’d like to rebuild it what do I need to do
  • Creomod
  • Dec 14, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
383
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 16, 2024
AeroCoupe
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
899
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?