• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Engine A little help please.....

  • Thread starter Thread starter dk9mm
  • Start date Start date Dec 7, 2012

dk9mm

Member
Nov 7, 2012
39
0
7
Bay Area, California
Dec 7, 2012
#1
  • Dec 7, 2012
  • #1
Hello, in your opinion what is the best intake/carb combo for a stock 302? Is it cheaper to go Edelbrock? I want to keep it stock.

Intake part Performer 2121?

Carb Performer 1403? 500CFM

Thanks.
 

Falcon79

Active Member
Apr 6, 2009
214
8
29
Dallas, TX
Dec 8, 2012
#2
  • Dec 8, 2012
  • #2
You can't go wrong with a Edelbrock RPM performer intake and Edelbrock 1406 carb. Its a great upgrade for a stock or slightly modified engine. I have this setup and have had zero complaints about the performance or tuning.

just my opinion...
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Dec 8, 2012
#3
  • Dec 8, 2012
  • #3
I have always found a Holley to be easier to mount up. (I love a good carb fight!!! HOLLEY! HOLLEY!)
 

MusclecarAddicts

New Member
Dec 1, 2012
15
0
1
Hamilton,Ohio
Dec 8, 2012
#4
  • Dec 8, 2012
  • #4
I have the older style manifold..Edelbrock Torker. I agree with woodsnake..I've always used a holley carb..Ive got a 650 dbl pumper w/mechanical secondaries on my 302.I've never had any probs with the set-up. But also my engine isn't stock..lol
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Dec 8, 2012
#5
  • Dec 8, 2012
  • #5
as long as oyu are keeping the engine stock, the base edelbrock performer intake and 500cfm edelbrock carb will do just fine. if you have any thoughts of modifying the engine later on, then go with the performer rpm and an edelbrock 600cfm carb.
 

horse sence

15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
12,179
8,001
233
Wile Coyote's stunt double
Dec 8, 2012
#6
  • Dec 8, 2012
  • #6
one more for holley
 

horseballz

10 Year Member
Sep 30, 2009
824
19
49
Las Vegas, NV
Dec 8, 2012
#7
  • Dec 8, 2012
  • #7
All the upgrades that Holley should have included in a reasonably priced carb years ago and infinitely more easily changed tune-ability than any Jimmy Carter (uhh-Edelbrock) style fuel toilet. RIGHT HERE:

http://www.quickfueltechnology.com/carburetors-hot-rod-series

All for about $20 more than a Street Avenger. Of course you need to know and understand how carbs operate to reap the true and total benefits. Edelbrock carbs be extremely easy to set to their version of maximum performance, but really, all they do is "flush" the gas into the intake! If ya ask me again, I'll tell ya what I REALLY think!
Gene
 
Reactions: horse sence

Realmongo

I prefer to be called "Evil Genius"
Founding Member
Oct 10, 2001
2,468
86
99
Western Mass
Dec 9, 2012
#8
  • Dec 9, 2012
  • #8
Since you're sticking with a stock engine and the original cam has no RPM capability, you need to go for torque to keep the velocity up. So you would be best with either the 2121 you mentioned, the Weiand 8124, or even the stock 289 4V. Small holleys (465 CFM-570 CFM) are easy to set up with this arrangement.
 

bartl

Active Member
Feb 4, 2001
218
8
29
West Rutland, Vermont
Dec 9, 2012
#9
  • Dec 9, 2012
  • #9
Weiand Stealth/Autolite 4100.
 

Realmongo

I prefer to be called "Evil Genius"
Founding Member
Oct 10, 2001
2,468
86
99
Western Mass
Dec 10, 2012
#10
  • Dec 10, 2012
  • #10
bartl said:
Weiand Stealth/Autolite 4100.
Click to expand...

To quote the late Jon M. Enyeart, "If you have a correct Autolite 4100 on your Mustang - or other appropriate Ford product - you own the finest performing four barrel carburetor ever made."

If you can find the correct 1.08" 289 4100 then go for it!
 

bartl

Active Member
Feb 4, 2001
218
8
29
West Rutland, Vermont
Dec 11, 2012
#11
  • Dec 11, 2012
  • #11
Realmongo said:
To quote the late Jon M. Enyeart, "If you have a correct Autolite 4100 on your Mustang - or other appropriate Ford product - you own the finest performing four barrel carburetor ever made."

If you can find the correct 1.08" 289 4100 then go for it!
Click to expand...

...or even a 1.12" will be fine jetted correctly.
 

Realmongo

I prefer to be called "Evil Genius"
Founding Member
Oct 10, 2001
2,468
86
99
Western Mass
Dec 11, 2012
#12
  • Dec 11, 2012
  • #12
The drag strip tests showed the Autolites beat the Holleys out on a '66 fastback and a Shelby.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Bored with my 73
  • Curtis Harper
  • Apr 14, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
167
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Apr 23, 2026
RaggedGT
Engine Catch Can or not?
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
314
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 6, 2026
ctandc
C
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
373
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
S
Is the BOSS 302 block oem compatible with the 95 302?
  • saf_blu302
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
404
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 2, 2025
revhead347
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
196
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?