• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

? about problems for 351 in 66

  • Thread starter Thread starter A66Auto
  • Start date Start date Jan 24, 2004
A

A66Auto

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
113
0
0
Sacramento, CA
Jan 24, 2004
#1
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #1
I am trying to decide what type of motor to build for my 66. I was looking at the 331 stroker kit from CHP and I noticed that the 383 kit based on the 351 is the same cost, so I figure, go for the bigger motor.

I know some people have 351’s in their 65-66 mustangs and I want to know how hard it is to live with. Do you really have to lift the block out of the car to change the plug or can some shortie plugs be used? Will the bell housing for my 302 bolt up? Are there other things I should worry about?

Anyway, now I need to come up with a 351 block. Has anyone used a remanufactured block before? How did it work? What vehicles should I look for to find a block? Are there ones I should stay away from? Thanks
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Jan 24, 2004
#2
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #2
I think the 351W is a fine choice, you can get power output in the 400s without even trying compared to what it takes to get a 302 into the 400s.

The 351 that is such a PITA to change plugs in a 65-66 is the Cleveland not the Windsor. Not that it wont be "harder" than the 302, but you wont have to jack the motor up to do it either I think the Cleveland in the 65-66 is about the same difficulty as the FE in the 67-68s...a real pain in the keester, take it from a former 67-FE owner who is now using the 351W.

A stock 351W block is fine for sub 500fwhp duty, just make sure and have it THOROUGHLY checked and cleaned (magnafluxed). I also strongly suggest improved connectors (ARP bolts for rods and ARP studs for mains) for the bottom end on any rebuild...period.
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Jan 24, 2004
#3
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #3
I use a 351w in my 66, only 1 of the plugs is really a pain, but its not that big of a deal. Uses same motor mounts, and I think the bellhousing bolts up but don't quote me..
 
A

A66Auto

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
113
0
0
Sacramento, CA
Jan 24, 2004
#4
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #4
Anyone else? What about a remanfactured block, I saw one from PAW for like 200. Anyone have any experiance with them?
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Jan 24, 2004
#5
  • Jan 24, 2004
  • #5
IMHO.....a stock 351w block can take a LOT more than 500 horsepower at the flywheel. Thare are several stock blocked 302s that make 500hp at the flywheel and hold up perfectly for 10s of thousands of miles. A 351w block is a heck of a lot beefier!!! I think 92-96 F150s have roller 351w blocks.

shane
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Jan 25, 2004
#6
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #6
allcarfan said:
IMHO.....a stock 351w block can take a LOT more than 500 horsepower at the flywheel. Thare are several stock blocked 302s that make 500hp at the flywheel and hold up perfectly for 10s of thousands of miles. A 351w block is a heck of a lot beefier!!! I think 92-96 F150s have roller 351w blocks.
Click to expand...
I pretty much agree with you Shane, but I usually give conservative advice because I'd hate for some guy to grenade his mill based on advice I gave

The remanufacturered blocks are fine A66Auto, that is what I meant by stock block. PAW is a reputable company as well. For peace of mind I'd have your machine shop thoroughly check it over though.
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Jan 25, 2004
#7
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #7
stock 351W blocks will take more or less whatever you do to them, i wouldn't worry about their strength...
 
A

A66Auto

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
113
0
0
Sacramento, CA
Jan 25, 2004
#8
  • Jan 25, 2004
  • #8
Thanks all, P.S. ANyone know a good shop in the sacramento area?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
197
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
481
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
641
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
702
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Yesterday at 9:06 AM
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?