• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Added 20hp with C&L combo! Dyno results here

  • Thread starter Thread starter stylin99
  • Start date Start date Jan 20, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 4 of 5 Next Last

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Jan 30, 2004
#61
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #61
I'm pissed!

Black96VertGT said:
I really don't want to hear this! I just dropped $750 for all this stuff! But I'm going to install it anyway and if the dyno says it wasn't worth it, I'll ... I don't know what I'll do! I'll probably take them off and hold onto them until after the headswap. If they still don't help, then I'll sell them on ebay, I guess.
Click to expand...
My stuff just got here and rpmoutlet.com FUQed up the order!

I ordered:

C&L 10696P (96-98 Mass Air Kit w/ True-Flow pipe)
C&L 711 (C&L Upper Intake Plenum w/ Small PCV fitting (1996))

I got:

C&L 10699P (99-01 Mass Air Kit w/ True-Flow pipe)
C&L 711A (C&L Upper Intake Plenum w/ Large PCV fitting (2001+))

Now I have to send it back and wait probably 2 more weeks!
 
H

Highroller

Founding Member
Oct 18, 2002
320
0
0
Vegas
Jan 30, 2004
#62
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #62
Black96VertGT said:
My stuff just got here and rpmoutlet.com FUQed up the order!

I ordered:

C&L 10696P (96-98 Mass Air Kit w/ True-Flow pipe)
C&L 711 (C&L Upper Intake Plenum w/ Small PCV fitting (1996))

I got:

C&L 10699P (99-01 Mass Air Kit w/ True-Flow pipe)
C&L 711A (C&L Upper Intake Plenum w/ Large PCV fitting (2001+))

Now I have to send it back and wait probably 2 more weeks!
Click to expand...

Man that sucks... Waiting for anything is the worst.. I have been waiting for my Precision Industries Torque Converter (3200 stall) for 1 week, tomarrow it finally comes... I can't wait

Well when you finally get your parts, it will be worth the wait!!
 

StangClear

Founding Member
May 21, 2002
112
0
0
Elkton, MD
Feb 1, 2004
#63
  • Feb 1, 2004
  • #63
wms004 said:
I have a 2001.5 and thought I had an 80mm and that 2002+ had 85mm

-wade
Click to expand...

I measured my 03 GT MAF and the ends measure 85mm but in reduces down to 80mm at the throat of the MAF.

 

stylin99

Chrome Yellow Nightmare
Founding Member
Nov 20, 2000
3,233
1
0
Charlotte, NC
Feb 4, 2004
#64
  • Feb 4, 2004
  • #64
Okay I finished writing the C&L article which includes installation photos, tips, and how-to information. Also includes the dyno results, pricing, and other desired info.

For your reading pleasure:
www.yellowmustangregistry.com/cnl.html
 

Beau

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
3,050
0
0
San Diego
Feb 4, 2004
#65
  • Feb 4, 2004
  • #65
great write up you made me reconsider the C & L MAF.
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Feb 4, 2004
#66
  • Feb 4, 2004
  • #66
Very cool
But the dyno graphs at the bottom don't work for me... 404's.

Thanks again!!
 
9

99BRINGIT

Founding Member
Dec 27, 2000
1,153
1
0
Oklahoma City, OK
Feb 4, 2004
#67
  • Feb 4, 2004
  • #67
I have the remote optimizer on my car as well. I love it. Easy to tune.

I remember like a year ago, when I posted that I had it, amny people were like WTF? Everyone told me that it was a waist, and shouldnt be used. But it makes all teh difference in the world on teh dyno.

Congrats, on the good #'s.
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Feb 4, 2004
#68
  • Feb 4, 2004
  • #68
99BRINGIT said:
I have the remote optimizer on my car as well. I love it. Easy to tune.

I remember like a year ago, when I posted that I had it, amny people were like WTF? Everyone told me that it was a waist, and shouldnt be used. But it makes all teh difference in the world on teh dyno
Click to expand...
So theoretically, a Pro-M Optimizer could be better than a tune right? Since if you add more mods, you can tune the A/F yourself... and change it whenever you want without having to pay for another tune. (Maybe the Steeda adaptive tune is better though)

Soon enough I'm going to get a tune be it a chip or flash since I think I'm running rich. BUT, I'm not sure if I'm done modding my car yet so I may end up getting another tune later on then. Would an Optimizer be a better purchase? I'm going to get a 75mm tb before going to the dyno in a month or two.
 

Sam98

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
1,625
1
0
Albuquerque, NM
Feb 4, 2004
#69
  • Feb 4, 2004
  • #69
JonJon said:
So theoretically, a Pro-M Optimizer could be better than a tune right? Since if you add more mods, you can tune the A/F yourself... and change it whenever you want without having to pay for another tune. (Maybe the Steeda adaptive tune is better though)

Soon enough I'm going to get a tune be it a chip or flash since I think I'm running rich. BUT, I'm not sure if I'm done modding my car yet so I may end up getting another tune later on then. Would an Optimizer be a better purchase? I'm going to get a 75mm tb before going to the dyno in a month or two.
Click to expand...

That is exactly why I like the tweecer...
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Feb 4, 2004
#70
  • Feb 4, 2004
  • #70
Sam98 said:
That is exactly why I like the tweecer...
Click to expand...
But the Optimizer is $170
http://www.pro-flow.com/Product pages/remote_optimizer.htm
 

StangYellow

Founding Member
Sep 11, 2002
1,052
1
39
Feb 4, 2004
#71
  • Feb 4, 2004
  • #71
I dont know much about this Pro M optimizer, but does it give you exact readouts of your A/F mixture, or is it just a dial that says "leaner" and "richer"? It sounds to me that once you hit the dyno, then it can be adjusted for power gains. Is this correct, or can I play with this thing in my driveway and know my exact A/F ratio throughout the RPM range? The reason why I ask this is because if it is used when your car is sitting on the dyno, its probably cheaper, and will have the same result as getting a tune from the dyno shop.
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Feb 4, 2004
#72
  • Feb 4, 2004
  • #72
StangYellow said:
I dont know much about this Pro M optimizer, but does it give you exact readouts of your A/F mixture, or is it just a dial that says "leaner" and "richer"? It sounds to me that once you hit the dyno, then it can be adjusted for power gains. Is this correct, or can I play with this thing in my driveway and know my exact A/F ratio throughout the RPM range? The reason why I ask this is because if it is used when your car is sitting on the dyno, its probably cheaper, and will have the same result as getting a tune from the dyno shop.
Click to expand...
The site says : "This is best done using a fuel/air ratio meter. Care should be taken, as it is possible to damage the engine by running it too lean. If it smokes and burbles it is too rich. More important, if it pops or pings, it is too lean."

and actually, I'm going ot make a new thread about the Optimizer to not hijack this one...
 

Sam98

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
1,625
1
0
Albuquerque, NM
Feb 4, 2004
#73
  • Feb 4, 2004
  • #73
JonJon said:
But the Optimizer is $170
http://www.pro-flow.com/Product pages/remote_optimizer.htm
Click to expand...

True, but all you can do is fool the PCM into making the air-fuel ratio richer or leaner. With the tweecer you can change anything though I will admit it isn't as easy to use.
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Feb 4, 2004
#74
  • Feb 4, 2004
  • #74
Sam98 said:
True, but all you can do is fool the PCM into making the air-fuel ratio richer or leaner. With the tweecer you can change anything though I will admit it isn't as easy to use.
Click to expand...
Yeah, the SCT tuner package looks nicer, but that's even more than the Tweecer package.
Just tinkering with the A/F is probably all I'd ever do anyways
 

Sam98

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
1,625
1
0
Albuquerque, NM
Feb 4, 2004
#75
  • Feb 4, 2004
  • #75
It seems like the more you pay, the better it gets but it is nice being able to change it yourself...
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Feb 4, 2004
#76
  • Feb 4, 2004
  • #76
Sam98 said:
It seems like the more you pay, the better it gets but it is nice being able to change it yourself...
Click to expand...
Yeah, agree
 

todd4566

Founding Member
May 24, 2000
1,075
0
36
California
Feb 4, 2004
#77
  • Feb 4, 2004
  • #77
Highroller said:
well the plenum and t/b I felt instantly.. and it takes alot for my SOTP meter to work.. I could really believe I got more then 15 hp from them.

the only reason I think im not running rich is because i had a chip made and my tuner said I was pretty much dead on, but he made just alittle adjustments and he said they were dead on.. now that was before the plenum and throttle body but it seems like my computer would of adjusted.. i felt alot more power days later.. as if it took some adjustments by computer to get the maximum results
Click to expand...

Can't I just slap on the plenum and T-body and let the computer figure out the rest? There's no place close to tune anything around here.
 

Sam98

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
1,625
1
0
Albuquerque, NM
Feb 4, 2004
#78
  • Feb 4, 2004
  • #78
todd4566 said:
Can't I just slap on the plenum and T-body and let the computer figure out the rest? There's no place close to tune anything around here.
Click to expand...

If that's all you change, the adaptive strategy should take care of it pretty quickly...
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Feb 5, 2004
#79
  • Feb 5, 2004
  • #79
JonJon said:
So theoretically, a Pro-M Optimizer could be better than a tune right? Since if you add more mods, you can tune the A/F yourself... and change it whenever you want without having to pay for another tune. (Maybe the Steeda adaptive tune is better though)

Soon enough I'm going to get a tune be it a chip or flash since I think I'm running rich. BUT, I'm not sure if I'm done modding my car yet so I may end up getting another tune later on then. Would an Optimizer be a better purchase? I'm going to get a 75mm tb before going to the dyno in a month or two.
Click to expand...
Doesn't it make it richer or leaner throughout the whole RPM range? What if you are fine up to about 3500 and then get richer as the RPMs get higher? That's what my dyno says. It couldn't fix that, could it?
 

stylin99

Chrome Yellow Nightmare
Founding Member
Nov 20, 2000
3,233
1
0
Charlotte, NC
Feb 5, 2004
#80
  • Feb 5, 2004
  • #80
You should not attempt to use the Optimizer without the dyno showing you the air/fuel ratio. It is extremely dangerous to simply twist the dials in your driveway with no idea of the effect it's having on your air/fuel.

There are ports on the box for a volt meter to read the voltage it's putting out. But you can't exactly read it while at full throttle going down the local street.
You need to put it on a stationary dyno to dial it in properly.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 4 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Y
Dyno Comparison for TFS 44cc Ported Heads vs PI Ported Heads with same VT Stage 2 Cams
  • Yel2002GTAuto
  • Oct 13, 2022
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
9K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 29, 2023
Yel2002GTAuto
Y
K
SOLD 1988 Ford Mustang GT, lots of upgrades, Maximum Motorsports Suspension PRICE DROP $6800
  • kuhl0040
  • Aug 18, 2021
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
4K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Sep 20, 2021
Noobz347
0
01 running rich
  • 01_GT
  • Oct 6, 2020
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
1K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 21, 2020
McFly2
M
Electrical 95 cobra random dyno numbers
  • Moeofit32
  • Apr 14, 2020
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
8
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Apr 19, 2020
Moeofit32
M
A
Engine Turbo 5.0 Mustang bad misfire at WOT
  • AwxyMoron
  • Apr 3, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
51
Views
9K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 5, 2021
a91what
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?