• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

advice from veterans?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 302RWP
  • Start date Start date Feb 8, 2004
3

302RWP

New Member
Feb 8, 2004
100
0
0
Northern California
Feb 8, 2004
#1
  • Feb 8, 2004
  • #1
hey everybody im new to these forums. i joined in hope of learning some stuff about my classic mustang and to meet some fellow mustang owners. just last summerwe summer 66 mustang coupe with a 302-4v from a late 60's model mustang (1968?) and a 4-spd manual. its pretty cool but other than the engine swap, its a stock pony. i was just wondering if you guys could help me out with getting the restoration in motion with a question. like everyone else, i want to make the car to handle better, look cooler, and be faster. what would be a better starting point be for this? i wwas thinking about rebuilding the suspension from a Mustangs Plus performance kit that includes five leaf springs, 620 coil springs, 1 1-8' front sway bars and shocks. does this seem like a good idea or should i spend the 1,000 bucks elsewhere? any advice vetetans?
 
6

67GTA-FB429

Member
Dec 15, 2003
777
0
16
Tri-Cities, Wa
Feb 8, 2004
#2
  • Feb 8, 2004
  • #2
Drive your car a awhile, get to know it. I just put the kit you are describing in my car. The 5 leafs are VERY stiff. I needed the 620s to hold up a 429. You will find a number of people here that will tell you softer springs are the way to go...and I would agree.

What do you want you car to look like?? What do you want it to sound like. What about engine performance??

Get a final goal and work towards it, don't piece-meal your restoration.

Good Luck. There are some very knowledgable people in here.
 
S

slapper

Founding Member
Mar 6, 2002
447
0
0
Feb 9, 2004
#3
  • Feb 9, 2004
  • #3
67GTA-FB429 said:
Drive your car a awhile, get to know it. I needed the 620s to hold up a 429. You will find a number of people here that will tell you softer springs are the way to go...and I would agree./QUOTE]

This is good advice.
I thought the 620s were stiff also with a small block.
I swapped to progressive and am very happy.
Good luck.
Click to expand...
 
3

302RWP

New Member
Feb 8, 2004
100
0
0
Northern California
Feb 9, 2004
#4
  • Feb 9, 2004
  • #4
thanks a bunch guys my ride is stiff as it is and i wouldn't really want it any stiffer. how would i know the softer or harder coil spring? would it's number be lower or higher? ex. would 750 springs be stiffer? thanks in advance to everyone
 
6

67GTA-FB429

Member
Dec 15, 2003
777
0
16
Tri-Cities, Wa
Feb 9, 2004
#5
  • Feb 9, 2004
  • #5
The bigger the number the harder the spring...it takes more force to compress it.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Feb 9, 2004
#6
  • Feb 9, 2004
  • #6
i agree with 67, best to drive the car awhile and think about area's you want to improve. also when you finally start buying parts dont go overboard on the actual parts you buy. for example you indicated you wanted a 1 1/8" anti-roll bar. unless you are planning on going racing, that is going to be too much front bar for you application. the 1" front bar is quite adequate. as are the gt springs for the front(480lb rate). at the rear i would use some good 4 leaf rear springs like the ones mustangs plus sells, along with a 5/8" rear anti-roll bar. this will make a decent handling good riding mustang that your significant other wouldnt mind riding in.
 

Pakrat

Founding Member
Aug 6, 2000
3,843
0
56
Currently: NH Originally: Rhode Island (and all po
Feb 9, 2004
#7
  • Feb 9, 2004
  • #7
Also, it may be wise to do some things in order of practicality, as opposed to coolness or desire, once you have adjusted to the car, even though the desire is what drives us. For example, going faster is pointless if you can't stop faster. If this is your first classic and you have 4 wheel drum brakes still, you have likely already experienced a little of the culture shock that comes along with older cars and their all but forgotten technology. Don't get me wrong, I do run my drums still with a normally modded 302 (cam, intake, carb, headers w/ dual exhaust, etc...), but I certainly don't apply the same rules I do as with a newer disc set up and I keep them well maintianed to insure dependibility. Don't get scared about drums, just be aware of their limitations.

Your ability to do mechanics as well as your cash flow will dictate most of what can do from what you may want or think you want to do or have done. Some upgrades are also very simple and can be done immediatly without affecting any current or future plans for the car and so might be a good way for you to wet your wistle and build some confidence in your skills, like say if you still have a single or dual point set up, a switch to a pertronix type electronic ignition is a general thing that anyone with any shape of running car should consider. We are all here to learn and help so ask questions when in doubt and be patient, things can and will go wrong with a 38 year old car no matter how many new parts are in it.

Good luck with the car and welcome to the hobby.

Pak.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Feb 9, 2004
#8
  • Feb 9, 2004
  • #8
The wisest place to spend your money is on safety. Better brakes/wheels/tires, or improved seat belts (shoulder) and seats are a good thing to upgrade. Then you can look into making it faster and prettier.

Did you swap that 302 into a 6 cylinder car? If so make sure you have upgraded the suspension components like control arms, sway bars, axles to cope with the power and weight of the V8..
 

SuperDave

Early-Model Mentor
Founding Member
May 3, 2000
6,361
0
0
Tacoma, WA USA
Feb 9, 2004
#9
  • Feb 9, 2004
  • #9
Just a passing note on 620's. They may be installed (in my experience) WITHOUT a spring compresser. A simple STOMP from my size 13's puts them right on the perches.

Although 620's are shorter than stock springs, they have more capacity hence the firmer ride and "the look" that is popular with many (but not ME).
 
1

1973mach1

Member
May 19, 2003
457
0
16
PA
Feb 9, 2004
#10
  • Feb 9, 2004
  • #10
SuperDave said:
Just a passing note on 620's. They may be installed (in my experience) WITHOUT a spring compresser. A simple STOMP from my size 13's puts them right on the perches.

Although 620's are shorter than stock springs, they have more capacity hence the firmer ride and "the look" that is popular with many (but not ME).
Click to expand...


I dont' mean to hi-jack the thread but was wondering do you guys recomend using the top pad with the 620's? I bought a set from Sacramentomustang.com and it says use pad for stock height, no pad for 1in drop. I dont know how a 1in drop in front would look with a 73 mach 1 though. Thats cool you dont have to use a spring compressor usually. This was my first time changing coil springs, it had stock ones, they were a good 2in taller then the 620's but thinner and probally sagged more. I took the stock one out, that was a scarey job I kept waiting for the spring to come loose and take my head off. IM just stripping the undercoating, repainting it with POR-15 getting the surface rust off the control arms and painting them before I reinstall. As for buying 620's for your early Mustang that might be way to firm, I was told it would give my 73' mach 1 a firm ride and thats a much bigger car with a 351c.

Jim
 
L

Lswhat

New Member
Feb 9, 2004
126
0
0
Orlando
Feb 10, 2004
#11
  • Feb 10, 2004
  • #11
well personally i like the firm ride in my 67 with the 620s and the five leaf rears but like everybody else has stated its not for everyone. i do like the 73s with a 1 inch drop on the nose because the body almost begs for it with the lines. Also being a heavier car with the heavier motor it will be a firmer ride but not to the point where it doesnt move like mine.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Feb 11, 2004
#12
  • Feb 11, 2004
  • #12
I used a very thin polyurethane pad on my springs, metal-to-metal equals squeaks in my experience.
 

LMan

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
1,246
0
0
Mom's basement
Feb 11, 2004
#13
  • Feb 11, 2004
  • #13
I dont know how you get a 1" drop just from leaving the insulator out, which is a bad idea for other reasons IMO. The insulator is only about 1/8" thick IIRC.

Do the Shelby mod in the front and you will get your 1" drop.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
738
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SN95 The Unicorn
  • HANO Motorsports
  • May 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 15, 2025
HANO Motorsports
J
68 Mustang with Foxbody Engine Stalling Issues - MSPNP2
  • JayV68Stang
  • Mar 13, 2025
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
3
Views
412
Digital Self-tuning Forum Mar 13, 2025
JayV68Stang
J
R
Hello! Just Got here & Just bought a 1964.5/1965 Mustang ...
  • RMneanCA
  • May 29, 2024
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
758
The Welcome Wagon Jun 2, 2024
RMneanCA
R
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
458
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?