• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Advise for a potential buyer 95 GT vert

  • Thread starter Thread starter Husky44
  • Start date Start date May 9, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Husky44

10 Year Member
Sep 27, 2006
865
104
74
Tacoma, WA
May 9, 2008
#1
  • May 9, 2008
  • #1
I can't get forum searches to work worth a darn, but I did scan a bunch of pages, to see how many times you guys have already answered these questions, and I came up empty.

I'm looking at a 95 GT convertible, 57k miles, 2nd owner has had it since 97. What should I be looking for? I'm pretty good on first generation Mustangs, and learned a little about Fox bodies (because the donor car for my 67 vert was a 91 LX). But I know NOTHING about this body style, other than this is the last year of the 5.0, and that it's different than the older 5.0s. What are the problems on these?

I'm buying something to use as a summer toy, drive to work, nice weekends, that kind of thing. Not looking to do a lot of mods. I've got my 67 for that, but it's not going to be ready for the road this summer.

Please give me as much advice as you can spare!

Car details:

Body looks good, with nothing but a few chips to the chin spoiler that someone has tried to cover up with touch up paint, not very noticeable. Top and interior are phenomenal.

Mods: Cobra wheels, K&N Filter, 70mm throttle body, MSD box and coil, FRP spark plug cables, BBK shorty headers, and an underhood brace (it'd be an export brace and monte carlo bar on a first gen Mustang, not sure what you call it on this one). Newer SS exhaust (but he only used 2" pipes! WTH?). Car drives awesome. I couldn't get under it, mainly due to time. Car is stored every year from Late OCT-Mid APR. Mainly highway miles, totaling 30k in last 10 years. Owner is in his 60s, and certainly is not the type to thrash the car.

THANKS!!!
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
May 9, 2008
#2
  • May 9, 2008
  • #2
There's no problems with these cars. They will run forever...until you attempt something STUPID like putting a 414 in one. Then it turns to ****.
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
May 10, 2008
#3
  • May 10, 2008
  • #3
Basically anything having to do with the Fox will carry over to the SN95 model, with a few small changes along the way (5 lug wheels, 4 wheel disc brakes, electric fan, CCRM that contains EEC, FP, and fan relays instead of individual relays, and a different EEC). With the low mileage like that, I'd jump on it in a heartbeat! Good luck with your decision!
 

Husky44

10 Year Member
Sep 27, 2006
865
104
74
Tacoma, WA
May 10, 2008
#4
  • May 10, 2008
  • #4
Pokageek said:
until you attempt something STUPID like putting a 414 in one. .
Click to expand...

Kinda like putting a 347 EFI into a 67???

If I buy it, I am not modifying this one in any way.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
May 10, 2008
#5
  • May 10, 2008
  • #5
the most common problems with these cars are the harmonic balancer and the pip in the distributor. this is not unreasonable as the car is now 14+ years old. other than that, there are no problems that seem to keep popping up on the forums.

as keith can attest ... and it sound like you are amiliar with it ... doing the modding thing can be a source of headaches. my hot rodding project took 2 years to get back on the road, and i have only been driving it a month or so. who knows if everything is shaken out yet or not?
 

Husky44

10 Year Member
Sep 27, 2006
865
104
74
Tacoma, WA
May 12, 2008
#6
  • May 12, 2008
  • #6
More Questions???

OK, I drove it, and put it up on jack stands. Drives out nice, no apparent problems.

On the jackstands, I was a little disappointed. By the way the car looked and was obviously maintained body/interior-wise, I expected it to be in great shape all the way through.

Underneath, I saw some oil on the bottom end. At least some of it is leaking from the D/S freeze plug (engine heater installed there). It was dry at the head gasket, but there is oil down onto the pan--can't tell if it's a leaking pan gasket? Also, hard to tell if it might be coming out at a rear main seal? No noticeable leak at the front of the pan. Did this engine have the multi-part pan gasket like the old 289/302?

Finally, the tranny (5 speed manual) was damp from oil. Looks like it's coming from the plate on the top where the shifter mounts. Is this a normal place for leakage?

Are either of these areas of big concern. Again, my intent here is to have a driver, since my 67 won't be ready this summer. I DON'T want another project car!
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
May 12, 2008
#7
  • May 12, 2008
  • #7
i wouldn't worry about those things. its probably the pan gasket (single piece). mine did the same thing. we just used some sealant and smeared it around and it held for years. if it had an aftermarket shifter installed, the silicone may not have sealed well. as long as the fluid level is okay, i wouldn't be to concerned

the car itself sounds great, don't know about the price, but it sounds good to me.
 

Husky44

10 Year Member
Sep 27, 2006
865
104
74
Tacoma, WA
May 12, 2008
#8
  • May 12, 2008
  • #8
Price is a little higher than I'd like--

He's asking $10k. Book value in AK for high retail is $7500-8000.

Problem in my mind is that it's right at that tipping point between a used car, and beginning to be a collectible. And although it's not one that someone parked in their garage when it was brand new, it's close.

So, what's a reasonable price for a near perfect body and interior, with only the problems I mentioned?

Did I mention it was bright YELLOW? (a definite plus in my book). Plus, I've always liked this body style, since it was Ford's first real attempt to bring back some of the original styling cues from the first generation cars.

Guess I need some validation, or someone to talk me off the ledge. The seller just left me a voice mail, which means he's probably ready to accept my offer from last night...
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
May 12, 2008
#9
  • May 12, 2008
  • #9
for me, the fact that it is the last year of the venerable 5.0 is a positive.

the fact that the body and interior are excellent is also a positive.

but i would not be willing to pay $10,000 for it. it sounds like it is worth the book value though.
 

RIO5.0

15 Year Member
Feb 16, 2001
6,892
8
128
N.H.
May 12, 2008
#10
  • May 12, 2008
  • #10
10K ???? Thats high for sure...even with those miles I'd doubt a dealer would even ask that...Thats mint Cobra territory, price wise...

Depends how many offers he had, and how much your loving it....I'd throw 8500 at him and see what gives...
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
May 12, 2008
#11
  • May 12, 2008
  • #11
That's how much I paid for my 95 in 1999 and it was MINT. That's a really high value now days unless somehow these years are retaining value in some way I don't know about.

I also wouldn't go over $8500. The yellow is hard to come by. I rarely seem them around town and when I do, it's almost always the same car.
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
May 12, 2008
#12
  • May 12, 2008
  • #12
RIO5.0 said:
10K ???? Thats high for sure...even with those miles I'd doubt a dealer would even ask that...Thats mint Cobra territory, price wise...

Depends how many offers he had, and how much your loving it....I'd throw 8500 at him and see what gives...
Click to expand...

I agree with Andy 10K is to much, as he said thats more mint condition Cobra asking price for these year cars.

Zero Signal said:
That's how much I paid for my 95 in 1999 and it was MINT. That's a really high value now days unless somehow these years are retaining value in some way I don't know about.

I also wouldn't go over $8500. The yellow is hard to come by. I rarely seem them around town and when I do, it's almost always the same car.
Click to expand...

Yeah but that was back in 99 when the cars where only 4 years old, its now 9 years later.
 

Husky44

10 Year Member
Sep 27, 2006
865
104
74
Tacoma, WA
May 12, 2008
#13
  • May 12, 2008
  • #13
Thanks for the validation!

I offered him $8500 yesterday...he said he needed to think about it. I wouldn't pay $10k. That said, playing with toys here in AK is a little more expensive. The market's fairly limited (rear wheel drive convertibles aren't exactly common, and the ones that are in good shape are VERY SCARCE=$$$). Plus, the sellers generally know that going for<<<<<<<BREAKING NEWS>>>>>>>

Seller just called, I'm picking it up at 7 pm tonight!!!

WOOT!

Pics to follow

Thanks guys!

PS, when you see me start posting about mods--STOP ME!!!
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
May 12, 2008
#14
  • May 12, 2008
  • #14
congrats!
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
May 12, 2008
#15
  • May 12, 2008
  • #15
Redline_351R said:
I agree with Andy 10K is to much, as he said thats more mint condition Cobra asking price for these year cars.



Yeah but that was back in 99 when the cars where only 4 years old, its now 9 years later.
Click to expand...

Yeah that was my point. How could he be asking that much 9 years later and mine was blue book at the time.





Post pics
 

Husky44

10 Year Member
Sep 27, 2006
865
104
74
Tacoma, WA
May 13, 2008
#16
  • May 13, 2008
  • #16
Picture of the new arrival!

Brought it home tonight! Too bad it's probably going to rain tomorrow. Here's a pic, along with it's older brother:





 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
May 13, 2008
#17
  • May 13, 2008
  • #17


welcome to the rabbit hole
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
May 13, 2008
#18
  • May 13, 2008
  • #18
Not a vert fan, but that's VERY nice

I'll go out on a limp and guess that the 67 has no motor? My 95 sits about that high in the front for that reason :\
 

'94ChickStang

Member
Sep 27, 2004
301
0
17
northern ca
May 13, 2008
#19
  • May 13, 2008
  • #19
***Edit below***
 

The O.G.

Member
May 28, 2007
145
0
16
witch city,mass
May 13, 2008
#20
  • May 13, 2008
  • #20
car looks good
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
New Owner: Very Clean 1991 GT Convertible. All original with 21k original Miles. How to make it better?
  • gvanginkel403
  • Oct 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 17, 2025
Jarhead67
J
L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
215
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
351
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
W
Help with 95 GT
  • waynewl34
  • Apr 5, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
303
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 5, 2025
Noobz347
E
2007 GT Stalls when lights or a/c turned on
  • ejscarfo
  • Jun 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
136
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jun 29, 2026
ejscarfo
E
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?