• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

AFR 165 or 185's

  • Thread starter Thread starter nick6690
  • Start date Start date Mar 20, 2008

nick6690

Member
Mar 2, 2008
147
1
17
McDonough, GA
Mar 20, 2008
#1
  • Mar 20, 2008
  • #1
Which heads would be better on a 306 with a comp cams xe282hr cam (.565, .574 lift and 282, 290 duration) and a edelbrock performer 2 intake?
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Mar 20, 2008
#2
  • Mar 20, 2008
  • #2
for a 306 i'd go 165, the runner volume is better suited to a 306 and they flow EXCELLENT for the runner size.

the 185s move more air but the increased runner size will require the 302 to turn some higher RPM to move enough air to actually use those heads.

not to mention if your running stock pistons the 185s probably wont work. the 185s are an inline valve heads and are 2.02/1.6 and you will probably run into PTV contact at the edge of the eye brow notches on the stock pistons.

the 165s only have 1.9/1.6 and shouldnt run into any PTV problems, but its still good practice to check regardless of what you run.

i think the 165s will work better for a N/A 306. not saying the 185s wont work well the 165s.

now on the other hand if your going to run forced induction you could use a bigger runner head like the 185 if you like.

but the 185s for a N/A deal would work better on a 347 or 351 etc.. something with more displacment that is going to move more air at lower engine speeds.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Mar 20, 2008
#3
  • Mar 20, 2008
  • #3
I am assuming you have some aftermarket pistons (larger valve reliefs) with the 306.

If so, I would go with AFR 185cc heads with that combination.

A custom camshaft would help as well.
 

mazroth

Member
May 20, 2005
56
0
6
KY
Mar 20, 2008
#4
  • Mar 20, 2008
  • #4
nick6690 said:
Which heads would be better on a 306 with a comp cams xe282hr cam (.565, .574 lift and 282, 290 duration) and a edelbrock performer 2 intake?
Click to expand...

The 185s would fit those parts better. Be sure to get the appropriate springs to match that cam. Check the lower intake, make sure things line up well with the heads as well.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Mar 21, 2008
#5
  • Mar 21, 2008
  • #5
5spd GT said:
I am assuming you have some aftermarket pistons (larger valve reliefs) with the 306.

If so, I would go with AFR 185cc heads with that combination.

A custom camshaft would help as well.
Click to expand...

 

nick6690

Member
Mar 2, 2008
147
1
17
McDonough, GA
Mar 21, 2008
#6
  • Mar 21, 2008
  • #6
thanks a lot guys.
 

enyawix

Member
Dec 18, 2005
507
0
19
127.0.0.1
Mar 22, 2008
#7
  • Mar 22, 2008
  • #7
this was covered

http://airflowresearch.com/articles/article102/A-P1.htm
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Mar 22, 2008
#8
  • Mar 22, 2008
  • #8
enyawix said:
this was covered

http://airflowresearch.com/articles/article102/A-P1.htm
Click to expand...

thats a good write up. Glad the owners who modded my car before me went with the AFR 185's
 

nick6690

Member
Mar 2, 2008
147
1
17
McDonough, GA
Mar 22, 2008
#9
  • Mar 22, 2008
  • #9
enyawix said:
this was covered

http://airflowresearch.com/articles/article102/A-P1.htm
Click to expand...

do u think it will have the same results on a 306? the test was done on a 347.
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Mar 22, 2008
#10
  • Mar 22, 2008
  • #10
nick6690 said:
do u think it will have the same results on a 306? the test was done on a 347.
Click to expand...

No the results wont be the same. While its still in the small block family the 347 is built more for heads like the 185's while the 302 is better suited for 165's. Look at the HP differences in that link w/ the 165 VS 185 on the 347, you can see that it needed the 185's to fully breath more. Your 306 is much much closer to a 302 then the 347. It all depends on your combo now though. If you have a good flowing intake and a good cam you can pull off the 185's on the 306
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Resolved Weird sound coming from a freshly rebuilt 5.0L
  • karhoot
  • Jun 24, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
158
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 27, 2026
Mac131
M
My numbers sound right?
  • MiltP
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
728
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 2, 2026
MiltP
M
9
Does anyone else have a combo close to this
  • 90Stanger302
  • Dec 10, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
242
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 25, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
791
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?