• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

AFR 205's on 351w based motors

  • Thread starter Thread starter TrickStang37
  • Start date Start date Apr 4, 2006

TrickStang37

New Member
Oct 17, 2004
292
0
0
Apr 4, 2006
#1
  • Apr 4, 2006
  • #1
seeing if anyone has had any problems with their exhaust with AFR 205 headed 351w based motors. It says the exhaust ports were raised .125" from stock location, just seeing if that was enough to throw the exhaust (headers) way off. thanks.
 
S

ssppiitt

New Member
Apr 8, 2003
206
0
0
Mountain View, Ca.
Apr 5, 2006
#2
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #2
A lot of people have the 205's. You should mathc your setup though. Are you planningto use your existing headers? What headers do you have? I personally have the 185's due to costs and personal preferance.
 

TrickStang37

New Member
Oct 17, 2004
292
0
0
Apr 5, 2006
#3
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #3
i dont have either yet, just trying to get this information ahead of time.
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Apr 5, 2006
#4
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #4
I just don't see how raising the exhaust ports a mere 1/8" can cause any problems.
 
R

REPLIMOD #17

New Member
Oct 8, 2004
52
0
0
Apr 5, 2006
#5
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #5
I'm running AFR 205's with Hedman 351w swap headers.
The 302 headers will work also but not with a cable clutch.
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Apr 5, 2006
#6
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #6
TrickStang37 said:
seeing if anyone has had any problems with their exhaust with AFR 205 headed 351w based motors. It says the exhaust ports were raised .125" from stock location, just seeing if that was enough to throw the exhaust (headers) way off. thanks.
Click to expand...

Specialty header manufacturers, such as Accufab, will ask you if your ports are raised. Same price.
 

thehueypilot

Active Member
Feb 25, 2004
1,084
0
37
Medina,Tennessee
Apr 5, 2006
#7
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #7
I'm running AFR 225's and the only issue is it takes a special header gasket because of the bigger port size. The header placement is not an issue for my 68.
 
J

Jc69Stang

New Member
Mar 24, 2004
95
0
0
Apr 6, 2006
#8
  • Apr 6, 2006
  • #8
My super comps touch the floor pan on the pass side, could be due to the raised port. I plan on grinding a little notch and it should clear no problem...
 

TrickStang37

New Member
Oct 17, 2004
292
0
0
Apr 6, 2006
#9
  • Apr 6, 2006
  • #9
interesting. sounds like i shouldnt run into too many problems then. what heads do you have, 205's or 225's? I know the 225's are raised a little higher still than the 205's.
 
J

Jc69Stang

New Member
Mar 24, 2004
95
0
0
Apr 6, 2006
#10
  • Apr 6, 2006
  • #10
oops, mine are 205s
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Apr 6, 2006
#11
  • Apr 6, 2006
  • #11
thehueypilot said:
I'm running AFR 225's and the only issue is it takes a special header gasket because of the bigger port size. The header placement is not an issue for my 68.
Click to expand...
You mean the header placement WASN'T an issue ?
 

thehueypilot

Active Member
Feb 25, 2004
1,084
0
37
Medina,Tennessee
Apr 7, 2006
#12
  • Apr 7, 2006
  • #12
10secgoal said:
You mean the header placement WASN'T an issue ?
Click to expand...

Yes....header placement was not an issue although I have custom made long tube 1.75" headers. I would think smaller tubes would have even more clearance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Resolved Need some assistance. Holley Terminator X alongside H/C/I. Very rough/inconsistent idle
  • karhoot
  • Jun 6, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
98
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 6, 2026
karhoot
K
Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
273
Other Auto Tech Jul 13, 2026
General karthief
SBF Head Flow Table - Work in Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 30, 2025
Noobz347
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
602
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?