• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Aftermarket brakes not always better than stock?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tamadrummer88
  • Start date Start date Jun 5, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Jester67

Member
Sep 21, 2004
908
1
18
TN
Jun 6, 2006
#21
  • Jun 6, 2006
  • #21
bnickel said:
the main reason that street rod guys use the M-II setup is because it is a million times better than the old solid axle suspensions those cars came with and those cars also have full frames as well. if you are dead set on the M-II then fine but at least take the time to strengthen the chassis and build some supports, think roll bar type cage, for the front suspension, especially if you plan on running a big block.
Click to expand...
I could not agree more the MII is not the end all be all that some would have you believe. I do not like them because they load the unit-body in ways it was NEVER designed. IMHO the only way to do it correctly is as stated early and that is to build a cage around it and even then you need to make sure that ALL of the welds are very good. You just cannot compare a framed car to a unit-body car they are totally different animals with different care and feeding requirements. This is in no way meant as an insult just one mans opinion but I have conducted the research and I do have some experience.
 

Alarus

New Member
Apr 29, 2005
226
0
0
Az
Jun 6, 2006
#22
  • Jun 6, 2006
  • #22
68Eleclone said:
its RARE these days to see a kid my age interested in old muscle, and actually respects them.
John
Click to expand...
Its more common than youd think, im only 19 and my first car was a 73 coupe, ill never own a ricer other than to save gas...unfortanatly my 73 was totaled a few months back, now im in the process of replacing it...
 

monk302

Founding Member
Apr 18, 2001
742
2
16
New Jersey
Jun 6, 2006
#23
  • Jun 6, 2006
  • #23
Alarus said:
Its more common than youd think, im only 19 and my first car was a 73 coupe, ill never own a ricer other than to save gas...unfortanatly my 73 was totaled a few months back, now im in the process of replacing it...
Click to expand...

Agreed. I was 16 when I got my ride and I am now 25. Loved every single minute of my car.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Jun 6, 2006
#24
  • Jun 6, 2006
  • #24
Off-Topic...

monk302 said:
Agreed. I was 16 when I got my ride and I am now 25. Loved every single minute of my car.
Click to expand...
Thats similar to me. The only difference is that out of the five cars I have owned thus far, four were Mustangs and two were classics('65 notch, '89 GT, '68 notch(current), '84 SVO(current). I played the ricer game for about a year when I didn't have any Fords and decided rather quickly that it wasn't for me. I almost got a late-'80s turbo Supra instead of a Fox3, but I could build a whole 302 for the same money it would cost just the fix the Supra's weak head gasket.
 

tamadrummer88

Active Member
Aug 19, 2005
599
79
39
Aloha State
Jun 7, 2006
#25
  • Jun 7, 2006
  • #25
Lets just play it by ear here, I really cant do anything until i get the suspension, all I can do is clean up the aprons and cut the shock towers, plus i have to replace the front left frame rail (rusted up), so until i get that suspension sitting on my garage floor, i cant do anything right now.


John
 

BIG-MAC

New Member
Jan 22, 2006
82
0
0
Dallas
Jun 7, 2006
#26
  • Jun 7, 2006
  • #26
I can understand running a MII suspension if you need to ax the shock towers for a large engine...but converting to a MII suspension for improved handling is an oxymoron. But since you plan on installing a 429 I surmise that handling is not what you are looking for? Plus you do not have to remove the shock towers to put a 429/460 into a 68 Mustang.

Take the $ you were going to invest in the Heidt's and get some Baers or Wilwoods.

If you are looking for ultimate handling I would stick with the original suspension but modify it with known performance mods...like lowered upper control arms, boxed lowers with spherical bearing, Koni shocks, bigger sway bar, stiffer springs, roller perches, ect...

Jay Bittles T/A coupe generated over 1.0g on the skidpad with a stock based suspension and period correct vintage race rubber.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Brakes 1966 Mustang convertible 289, Auto - Disc brake conversion issues
  • DRGunn427
  • Feb 26, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
697
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jul 23, 2026
All Stock93
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
868
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
S
I don know what im doing!
  • Sha_lala_pookie
  • May 5, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
563
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- May 11, 2025
Sha_lala_pookie
S
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
602
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
776
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?