• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Air Fuel ratio bung location.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Praetorious
  • Start date Start date Feb 7, 2026
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
P

Praetorious

Active Member
May 22, 2020
102
55
38
living room.
Feb 8, 2026
#21
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • #21
I knew at some point that Bung reference was going to come and Bite me in the Butt (no pun intended)lol
 
Reactions: DadLife0724
O

OX1

Active Member
Apr 16, 2014
51
74
29
Feb 8, 2026
#22
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • #22
How I mounted mine in a single turbo, 3" downpipe on my Capri.



I was always curious how accurate widebands are, so I bought
two different brand kits, and ran them next to each other.

Pretty close (cold start)



http://luxjo.supermotors.net/CAPRI/EEC%20QUARTER%20HORSE%20TUNER/WIDEBANDS/20190721_121127.mp4
 
Reactions: Noobz347, DadLife0724, Blackhawkxx and 1 other person
P

Praetorious

Active Member
May 22, 2020
102
55
38
living room.
Feb 8, 2026
#23
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • #23
Thank you so much for those pictures OX1!
 
Reactions: OX1 and GOvert

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,441
1,526
194
Maryland
Feb 8, 2026
#24
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • #24
AeroCoupe said:
So the wide band is located after your X but before the cats, correct?
Click to expand...
Yes
 
Reactions: GOvert and AeroCoupe

Blackhawkxx

Advanced Member
Mar 3, 2023
483
477
73
Feb 8, 2026
#25
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • #25
GOvert said:
One of the best AFR gauge kits available
Click to expand...
Just curious as I'm thinking of getting one, why did you think it is one of the best?
 
P

Praetorious

Active Member
May 22, 2020
102
55
38
living room.
Feb 8, 2026
#26
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • #26
GOvert said:
Soon at work, I/we will be installing a pair of O2 sensor bungs for the wideband O2 AFR gauge. These come with plugs. We are installing two and are purchasing these with the plugs in case we thought that we had an engine problem and wanted to momentarily swap to the other side. They will be 1.5" from the stock narrowband sensors and clocked at about 11 next to the narrows that are at 9.5.
O2 bungs with plugs
One of the best AFR gauge kits available
ADDED: Here is a link to just a pair but they don't have the step which I prefer. If you use the non-step ones, make sure the hole in the pipe is big enough for the sensor.
pair of two bungs without the step, with plugs
Click to expand...
Thank you for all that info too,specially the bungs,i wasn't aware they were 2 types,seems like stepped is the way to go, hole is already drilled and you dont risk ruining the thread on the new bung while drilling the hole plus our welder is a bit temperamental, anything i can do to make his job easier he will like that,lol
 
Reactions: GOvert
G

GOvert

15 Year Member
Jan 27, 2007
490
100
63
north central Tennessee Valley
Feb 8, 2026
#27
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • #27
@Blackhawkxx The AEM AFR wideband gauge set/kit was highly recommended by a pro-tuner associate. I installed it on a vehicle that the pcm was tuned for the specific injectors and MAFS. I get regular readings bouncing around between 14 to 15 air/fuel ratio but closer to 14.2 to 14.7 so I feel that the AEM AFR set-up is functioning well and accurate. As of yet, I haven't compared it to another brand, but I do have a spare O2 bung with a plug in it for when that time comes.
@OX1 I see that you have done what I was already proposing. I need to find my cheap one and install next to the AEM to see how close that it is to it.
 
Reactions: OX1 and Blackhawkxx
O

OX1

Active Member
Apr 16, 2014
51
74
29
Feb 9, 2026
#28
  • Feb 9, 2026
  • #28
I've been told the Innovate controls/monitors the heater circuit better than the AEM.
I know the AEM starts working faster than the Innovate. Not sure if the Innovate does not want to
display until it thinks heater circuit is warmed up enough??
The Innovate digital display is larger, but I still think AEM is easier to read (crisper, maybe)

They are both about the same price and as I posted, read pretty much the same A/F.
 
Reactions: Blackhawkxx

Blackhawkxx

Advanced Member
Mar 3, 2023
483
477
73
Feb 9, 2026
#29
  • Feb 9, 2026
  • #29
Has anyone here ever used the AutoMeter wideband gauge?
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,116
21,288
234
Box behind Walmart
Feb 9, 2026
#30
  • Feb 9, 2026
  • #30
Blackhawkxx said:
Has anyone here ever used the AutoMeter wideband gauge?
Click to expand...

You really need to post a link to what you're referring to.

There are stand-alone gauges that require a signal from an actual wide-band to reflect useable data and then there are wide-bands ("kits" so to speak) that include a gauge.

Now... You can take a simple AFR gauge and feed it garbage from a narrow-band sensor but the readings from the display are utter gibberish; nothing more than a light show.

I have used an analog autometer gauge to display data sent from the analog feed of my Innovate LM1 wide band.

I do [not] like digital gauges in my 80's era Fox Mustang.
 

Blackhawkxx

Advanced Member
Mar 3, 2023
483
477
73
Feb 9, 2026
#31
  • Feb 9, 2026
  • #31
Noobz347 said:
You really need to post a link to what you're referring to.

There are stand-alone gauges that require a signal from an actual wide-band to reflect useable data and then there are wide-bands ("kits" so to speak) that include a gauge.

Now... You can take a simple AFR gauge and feed it garbage from a narrow-band sensor but the readings from the display are utter gibberish; nothing more than a light show.

I have used an analog autometer gauge to display data sent from the analog feed of my Innovate LM1 wide band.

I do [not] like digital gauges in my 80's era Fox Mustang.
Click to expand...
Here are a couple.

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/atm-4379

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/atm-3379
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,116
21,288
234
Box behind Walmart
Feb 9, 2026
#32
  • Feb 9, 2026
  • #32
Blackhawkxx said:
Here are a couple.

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/atm-4379

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/atm-3379
Click to expand...


Both of those include the sensor so they are more than just gauges.
 

gkomo

now i can hopefully expect to receive the shaft
Aug 2, 2024
2,185
1,433
133
San Diego, CA
Feb 9, 2026
#33
  • Feb 9, 2026
  • #33
Damn should have bought the autometer to match my boost gauge instead of my AEM wideband.
 
G

GOvert

15 Year Member
Jan 27, 2007
490
100
63
north central Tennessee Valley
Feb 10, 2026
#34
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • #34
@OX1 The two that you are comparing, do they both use the Bosch lsu. 4.9 WB sensor?
When I use the word "kit", I mean everything necessary to install the gauge/Bosch lsu 4.9 wideband sensor including the bung and other hardware.
From AEM 30-4110

Features:​

  • Interchangeable black and white faceplates included for customizing gauge appearance (digital gauges only)
  • 4.9 LSU wideband sensor and weld-in bung included (PN 30-4110)
  • No free air sensor calibration required, ever
  • Interchangeable black and silver bezels included
  • Interchangeable black and white faceplates included
  • 52mm (2-1/16") gauge housing
  • 0-5v analog output (10-20 AFR range only)
I'm splitting the signal from the wideband sensor when the Moates QuarterHorse device is attached to the pcm and the RT results are appearing on the "laptop" digital dashboard. (ADDED: I would have to look at my wiring to verify this. the '97 vehicle is not right here in my kitchen).
I have the power wire piggybacked off of a "key on" power source.
On my '97 5.0, the wideband O2 sensor is ~24" from the head on the driver's side.
On the '89 5.0, the "H" pipe connection is further downstream than we feel comfortable installing the wideband O2 sensor bungs. That is why we picked the spots on the long tube header collectors' next to the stock "narrowband" sensors to place the wideband Bosch sensor/s.
AEM afr 30-4110 installation instructions PDF There is s good description as to how the Bosch lsu 4.9 sensor functions.
ADDED" I/we going to install a bung on everything else that I work on from everything to carbureted to fuel injection. Way back when, we would install Holley carbs, they always smelled rich when we were running around but not when we would go down to the beach at the "Gulf of Mexico".
 
Last edited: Feb 10, 2026

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,116
21,288
234
Box behind Walmart
Feb 10, 2026
#35
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • #35
GOvert said:
I'm splitting the signal from the wideband sensor when the Moates QuarterHorse device is attached to the pcm and the RT results are appearing on the "laptop" digital dashboard.
Click to expand...

For these scenarios, I prefer to have an AFR meter that has an external output.

I mean, in general: Folks that want AFR meters want it to do more than just power a gauge even if not at first.
 
Reactions: GOvert
G

GOvert

15 Year Member
Jan 27, 2007
490
100
63
north central Tennessee Valley
Feb 10, 2026
#36
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • #36
@Noobz347 That's what is nice about the more advanced WB/gauge kits.
I just walked out to my 5.0 vehicle and verified the wiring. The 6-pin connector from the WB O2 sensor first plugs into the gauge. Then I have the 5-volt "analog" output (white wire) going to the pcm/laptop wire. Diagram in the PDF document listed above.
I hope this discussion helps other people. At first, I wasted $50- on a cheap gauge kit that was nothing more than a 4-wire narrowband sensor hooked up to a cheap gauge. Then I bought a cheap WB kit, but it did have the Bosch lsu 4.9 WB O2 with it. Now after purchasing the AEM afr kit, I want to compare it to the cheaper wideband kit.
 
Reactions: Noobz347

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,116
21,288
234
Box behind Walmart
Feb 10, 2026
#37
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • #37
GOvert said:
I hope this discussion helps other people.
Click to expand...

I think it does. There is new stuff coming out all the time. I do see that the kits are evolving. There was time that the gauges fed by by narrow band sensors were all the rage and I mean internet fights over whether or not that "light show" was worth the time of day. I call those, "Boy Racer Kits".

And now it appears there are more inexpensive kits that are still true wide band kits. That's a good thing.
 
Reactions: GOvert
O

OX1

Active Member
Apr 16, 2014
51
74
29
Feb 11, 2026
#38
  • Feb 11, 2026
  • #38
GOvert said:
@OX1 The two that you are comparing, do they both use the Bosch lsu. 4.9 WB sensor?
Click to expand...

AEM is 10-12 years old and Innovate, about 5. Whatever wideband sensor they came with at that time.
I'd have to dig up instructions to see what exact O2 they are, but they are whatever came with the "kits".
 
Reactions: GOvert
O

OX1

Active Member
Apr 16, 2014
51
74
29
Feb 11, 2026
#39
  • Feb 11, 2026
  • #39
Noobz347 said:
I have used an analog autometer gauge to display data sent from the analog feed of my Innovate LM1 wide band.

I do [not] like digital gauges in my 80's era Fox Mustang.
Click to expand...
Normally I agree, but A/F just seems harder to read analog to me, especially idle/part throttle when it is bouncing around a lot.

That said, I did put a lot of work into my factory looking "analog" voltmeter, for 86 guage setup.
(in addition to stick on face I designed, I had guts replaced with an actual voltmeter with the correct sweep)







 
Reactions: GOvert, Blackhawkxx and DadLife0724

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,116
21,288
234
Box behind Walmart
Feb 11, 2026
#40
  • Feb 11, 2026
  • #40
OX1 said:
Normally I agree, but A/F just seems harder to read analog to me, especially idle/part throttle when it is bouncing around a lot.
Click to expand...

There are a lot of nice gauges out there. The one I have is white faced, amber backlight, and has an idiot light you can set for too far rich/lean. It's a quick reference. My LM-1 feeds a data log if I [really] need to be accurate on the reading.

I bought it to match my Kenne Bell Boost/Vac and Fuel Pressure gauges. It's not a perfect match but it's pretty good.
 
Reactions: GOvert and OX1
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
1982 Mustang GL 5.0 single to dual exhaust conversion
  • Guyton
  • Jun 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
670
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 1, 2025
limp
S
Requesting Guidance for 306 motor swap - Fuel? - SD? MAF?
  • So_Flo
  • Jul 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 4, 2026
Mcmahst
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
733
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
B
'03 GT Fuel Pump/Pressure/Delivery Issue
  • Brodach
  • Oct 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
916
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 31, 2025
gkomo
Charcoal canister question
  • 1hot87gt
  • Aug 25, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 13, 2025
1hot87gt
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?