• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Alignment drift

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cdaniel
  • Start date Start date Dec 13, 2004

Cdaniel

Founding Member
Nov 29, 2001
220
0
16
Arizona
Dec 13, 2004
#1
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #1
I've got a few thousand miles on a completely new stock front suspension in a 66 Fastback. It has new tires and was aligned at a reputable shop. I've recently noticed the camber is shifted to the negative on both wheels and is wearing the edges of the tires.

Any ideas what could cause this with all new parts? My 1st thought was shock towers but I have no cracks. Is the car possibly settling in after being on blocks for two years? Is a Monte Carlo bar in order?
 
U

usedtobe 67p51d

New Member
Jul 8, 2003
208
0
0
let's tear up golfcourses and build race tracks!
Dec 13, 2004
#2
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #2
if it's true stock the camber is only adjustable via shims behind the upper a-arms, so yes add a monte-carlo bar

check your fateners after EVERYTIME someone works on your car...a shop that I trusted left my strut-rod adjusting nuts untightend...they didn't even run them up to the stops

on '67 and up cars the camber is adjusted by the excentrics that the lower a-arms bolt through If you drive the car hard you'ld walk the adjusters. at willowsprings I'ld start with 1/2 degree of negative on left and right and come home with something like 2 degrees poitive on the left and neg 3 on the right and that would be with proper torque on the fastners


I started welding the excentrics to combat this untill I stopped useing the ford stuff.....G-plus sells a square plate with four holes set at differant setbacks to get your choice of firm settings
 
J

JB66

New Member
Aug 21, 2004
565
1
0
New York
Dec 13, 2004
#3
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #3
It is VERY unlikely that the camber is your problem. It would take an extreme amount of camber to wear the edges of your tires. The problem is your toe setting and it's probably because they set it with the engine not running. I'm assuming you have p/s. The free play in the p/s control valve is not taken up unless the car is running.
 

94CobraPace

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2000
907
1
0
Houston, Tx.
Dec 13, 2004
#4
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #4
Yes the eccentric adjuster can wear out, move & cause the tires to lean & wear on the edges. When my 67 did this I too got the square block from S+, harder to align, but once done it will not move.
 

Cdaniel

Founding Member
Nov 29, 2001
220
0
16
Arizona
Dec 13, 2004
#5
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #5
JB66 said:
It is VERY unlikely that the camber is your problem. It would take an extreme amount of camber to wear the edges of your tires. The problem is your toe setting and it's probably because they set it with the engine not running. I'm assuming you have p/s. The free play in the p/s control valve is not taken up unless the car is running.
Click to expand...

Well the steering is manual but toe could be part of the problem. However there does seem to be visible negative camber on both tires when viewed from the front.
 
J

JB66

New Member
Aug 21, 2004
565
1
0
New York
Dec 13, 2004
#6
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #6
The Ford shop manual states that the combined camber difference between the two front tires should be no more than 1/2*, and 1/4* is preferred. If you can visibly see camber in your front wheels, something is seriously wrong. Specs. are -1/4* to +1 1/4* with +1/2* as the desired setting. Shim pack thickness should not exceed 9/16". Did your alignment shop give you a printout?
 
O

Opentracker

20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 4, 2004
516
0
16
Dec 13, 2004
#7
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #7
Cdaniel said:
Well the steering is manual but toe could be part of the problem. However there does seem to be visible negative camber on both tires when viewed from the front.
Click to expand...


Try rolling the car backward by hand on a flat surface, then look at it. It's most likely the toe setting has moved from a 1/8" toe-in to a no-toe or a toe-out setting. If it looks better after the car has been rolled backward, it's time for a alignment. We use 0 camber on both sides, 1.5 to 2.5 Pos. caster on both sides with 1/8" toe-in. It is important that the caster and camber setting is the same on both sides or the car won't drive right.



John
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Dec 13, 2004
#8
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #8
Tell us more about the shop that did the front end set up. The shim process is very time consuming but necessary to get the alignment correct. It took over an hour to get mine where it needed to be and I was standing there the entire time to make sure it was correct.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 

Cdaniel

Founding Member
Nov 29, 2001
220
0
16
Arizona
Dec 13, 2004
#9
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #9
JB66 said:
The Ford shop manual states that the combined camber difference between the two front tires should be no more than 1/2*, and 1/4* is preferred. If you can visibly see camber in your front wheels, something is seriously wrong. Specs. are -1/4* to +1 1/4* with +1/2* as the desired setting. Shim pack thickness should not exceed 9/16". Did your alignment shop give you a printout?
Click to expand...

The print out is as follows:
camber L-.10 / R-.10
caster L-2.00 / R-1.70
toe L+.05 / R+.06

The guy did spend a while working on it. I watched from the fish tank the whole time. Looked like he was competent and was making multiple measurements and adjustments.
 
J

JB66

New Member
Aug 21, 2004
565
1
0
New York
Dec 13, 2004
#10
  • Dec 13, 2004
  • #10
Based on the caster readings, I'll assume it's a 6 cyl, because the v8 caster should be -1 to +1. Camber looks fine. Why did he set it to toe out, though? The specs. call for 1/8" to 3/8" toe-IN. Desired is 1/4" toe-in. That would be my guess as to the tire wear.
 

Cdaniel

Founding Member
Nov 29, 2001
220
0
16
Arizona
Dec 14, 2004
#11
  • Dec 14, 2004
  • #11
JB66 said:
Based on the caster readings, I'll assume it's a 6 cyl, because the v8 caster should be -1 to +1. Camber looks fine. Why did he set it to toe out, though? The specs. call for 1/8" to 3/8" toe-IN. Desired is 1/4" toe-in. That would be my guess as to the tire wear.
Click to expand...

It's a 289, not a 6. I guess I'll have to dig out my shop manual and take it with for discussion this weekend.
 
U

usedtobe 67p51d

New Member
Jul 8, 2003
208
0
0
let's tear up golfcourses and build race tracks!
Dec 14, 2004
#12
  • Dec 14, 2004
  • #12
toe it in,it should help
 

whwright

Member
Jun 3, 2003
150
0
16
Oklahoma City
Dec 14, 2004
#13
  • Dec 14, 2004
  • #13
I recently had a similar problem on a car (not a Mustang) that my son and I are working on. We completely rebuilt the suspension using stock-style bushings. After a few thousand miles, the upper control arm bushings were completely shot, and the tires had a visible lean to them. The tread was completely gone on the inside third of the tire.

We took it to an alignment shop and they basically said that the bushings we installed were junk. They had no other explanation why the bushings went bad so fast. We paid them to replace the bushings (because I was sick of messing with it) and realign everything (again). It has been fine since then.

Long story short: make sure that all the new parts you installed are still "new."

Wayne.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Alignment Suggestions
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jul 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
477
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 13, 2025
PonyGTrider
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
194
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
New to me 98 Cobra
  • bird_dog0347
  • Feb 25, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
1K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
FastDriver
SN95 The Unicorn
  • HANO Motorsports
  • May 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 15, 2025
HANO Motorsports
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?