• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

alignment problems after 5 lug conversion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tiptopss
  • Start date Start date Mar 18, 2010
T

tiptopss

Member
Apr 27, 2009
48
0
7
Mar 18, 2010
#1
  • Mar 18, 2010
  • #1
did anybody on here have any problems with alingment issues after doing a 5 lug conversion to there mustang? I am about to do the swap but read something about might needing longer a-arms, cause the fox ones are shorter, any truth to this? Also do you really need a bumpsteer kit? If I put the 95 spindles on and one half of the tire is almost off of the ground, what would a person do?
 

Repostyle

Member
Jun 11, 2005
538
0
16
Portland, OR
Mar 18, 2010
#2
  • Mar 18, 2010
  • #2
If your car is lowered you need caster camber plates to fix vertical alignment, your spindles didn't do that. You will definalty need an alignment after the swap, the tie rod holes are much farther out on sn95's so your front wheels will point in.

Did your wheels sit straight up and down before the swap? If so, you did something wrong like mount the struts on the wrong sides of the brackets or something like that.
 

Repostyle

Member
Jun 11, 2005
538
0
16
Portland, OR
Mar 18, 2010
#3
  • Mar 18, 2010
  • #3
Nevermind, I just re-read your post and see now it was hypothetical.

But part of my post still stands. You will need an alignment when your done.
 

281pony

Active Member
Aug 31, 2003
2,681
2
46
Oly, WA
Mar 19, 2010
#4
  • Mar 19, 2010
  • #4
you do not need different control arms. you will need either sn95 balljoints, or a .330" spacer on top of your spindle. the fox balljoint stud is longer then an sn95. thus, you need to take up the slack with a hardened spacer.

people sell the specific machined spacers for like $13 shipped online.
 
T

tiptopss

Member
Apr 27, 2009
48
0
7
Mar 19, 2010
#5
  • Mar 19, 2010
  • #5
thanks alot guys, but this is for a 85 gt, ive been told that the k member or a-arms are .5 inches shorter than the 87 and up gt,s. If this is true, I would think my front wheels would be away out of wack, and only longer control arms would fix the prob
 

Shaolin Crane

Banned
Oct 6, 2008
2,627
7
0
Kommiefornia
Mar 19, 2010
#6
  • Mar 19, 2010
  • #6
its not the a-arms that are shorter its the whole track width
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
849
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
F
5 lug disc brake pad help
  • Foxrider714
  • Nov 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
218
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 17, 2025
KRUISR
Brakes FOX BRAKES ISSUES
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
53
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 31, 2026
Mustang5L5
1
Electrical 1985 mustang gt Led conversion trouble
  • 1985fox
  • Jan 5, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
526
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 15, 2026
1985fox
1
Y
Resolved 5 lug conversion
  • Ybfav84
  • Dec 21, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
564
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 21, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?