• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Aluminum Master Cylinder - Manual Disks?

  • Thread starter Thread starter phutch11
  • Start date Start date Nov 14, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
P

phutch11

Member
Nov 14, 2005
328
2
18
Nov 14, 2009
#1
  • Nov 14, 2009
  • #1
I've got Scarebird disk brakes on my 66 with drums out back. I need to move to a new master cylinder as my current one is a dual for a 1967 with drums all around.

I know that the 74 Maverick is what is recommended, but I'd like to move away from the heavy cast iron MC and to a modern aluminum MC with a plastic reservoir.

I've heard of people running a 1993 Ranger master or one from a Cobra - 1995, I think.

The Cobra is way too much - $150; and the Ranger's diameter is close, but not dead on.

Anyone with manual disks running a modern aluminum MC?

Thanks
 
G

Grabber70Mach

Member
Jul 6, 2003
305
0
17
58
Indian Head, MD
Nov 15, 2009
#2
  • Nov 15, 2009
  • #2
If I remember correctly look at a 94-95 5.0 mustang. I think that is the one I used when I did my conversion.
 
P

phutch11

Member
Nov 14, 2005
328
2
18
Nov 15, 2009
#3
  • Nov 15, 2009
  • #3
Pedal feel good?

Good travel and ability to modulate?

Posted via Mobile Device
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
229
93
Nashville TN
Nov 16, 2009
#4
  • Nov 16, 2009
  • #4
I have an aluminum dual bowl master...I used one from an '84 t-bird....some of these are aluminum and some are cast iron...remanned it was $25 at autozone...however the ports are on the engine side so it would require new lines...but mine is still the old style without the plastic resevoir(I hate how cheap they look)

p.s. 7/8" bore so its great for manual brakes
 

Vinyl66

Member
Mar 21, 2004
398
0
16
56
Nov 17, 2009
#5
  • Nov 17, 2009
  • #5
I have Wilwood 4 wheel discs on my '66 and run the Ford D9AZ-2140-A master cylinder. It is all aluminum (no plastic) so it looks good in the engine compartment, has a 1" bore, and is much lighter than the big cast iron ones.
 
P

phutch11

Member
Nov 14, 2005
328
2
18
Nov 20, 2009
#6
  • Nov 20, 2009
  • #6
Just for the record, I found data that a MC from a 1993 Dodge Spirit would work- it doesn't work.

Just going with the old heavy 74 Maverick.
Posted via Mobile Device
 
G

Grabber70Mach

Member
Jul 6, 2003
305
0
17
58
Indian Head, MD
Nov 20, 2009
#7
  • Nov 20, 2009
  • #7
phutch11 said:
Pedal feel good?

Good travel and ability to modulate?

Posted via Mobile Device
Click to expand...

Sorry for the late reply, my setup is PDB and I just noticed that yours is manual. Mine works fine, but not really sure how it would work in a MDB setup.
 

JohnnyK81

Member
Sep 17, 2007
83
0
7
Nov 23, 2009
#8
  • Nov 23, 2009
  • #8
I'm in the same boat, except I Have power discs as well. I currently have the SN95 master on there, but it has a rock hard pedal feel.. It's 1 1/16 I believe, wondering if I should step it down to a 15/16 or so?
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Nov 23, 2009
#9
  • Nov 23, 2009
  • #9
7/8 and 15/16 are the sizes I'm use to seeing in a manual brake setup.
 

JohnnyK81

Member
Sep 17, 2007
83
0
7
Nov 23, 2009
#10
  • Nov 23, 2009
  • #10
Agreed. So I wonder why my 1 1/16 is far too stiff with a power booster. And if stepping down to a 15/16 will make my pedal hit the floor.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Nov 23, 2009
#11
  • Nov 23, 2009
  • #11
It should make your pedal effort easier but if you are having stiffness issues with the current setup, I would see if you have an issue with your booster as it is. Is the pedal just as stiff without the boosters assistance as it is with assistance ?
 

JohnnyK81

Member
Sep 17, 2007
83
0
7
Nov 23, 2009
#12
  • Nov 23, 2009
  • #12
Pedal does sink a bit when the car is started. As well it seems to hold pressure (it's a brand new remanned). However, what I found odd, is while driving on some gravel (Car isn't road worthy yet) I was testing the brakes. If I hammered on this brick of a pedal, the fronts locked, but the rears wouldn't, even with the adjust. prop valve all the way to the rear, but they bled fine, so I"m stumped.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Nov 23, 2009
#13
  • Nov 23, 2009
  • #13
Do you have drums in the rear ? Is there a residual pressure valve in the drum circuit ? Is it put in the proper direction ?
 

JohnnyK81

Member
Sep 17, 2007
83
0
7
Nov 23, 2009
#14
  • Nov 23, 2009
  • #14
Nah, SN95 discs in the rear, stock 68's up front. SN95 master, plumbed correctly (front to rear, etc), going into a simple Tee for the fronts. Rears go directly from the M/C to the prop valve. As I said, I'm stumped. Vacuum is good.
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Nov 24, 2009
#15
  • Nov 24, 2009
  • #15
Now that we have completely hijacked the thread....


What power booster are you using ?


.......


Actually, make another thread for this... it should really be on its own.
 

JohnnyK81

Member
Sep 17, 2007
83
0
7
Nov 24, 2009
#16
  • Nov 24, 2009
  • #16
Yeeeeeah, I apologize for that. But it's still helpful to the OP. Remanned Bendix. I was alternating between 10 and 15" vacuum.
 
P

phutch11

Member
Nov 14, 2005
328
2
18
Nov 24, 2009
#17
  • Nov 24, 2009
  • #17
No worries I,m all set with a vast iron boat anchor of a MC.

You may need a residual pressure valve in the rear circuit to keep enough fluid back there to get those rear discs to work.

What pedal are you using?

Posted via Mobile Device
 

JohnnyK81

Member
Sep 17, 2007
83
0
7
Nov 24, 2009
#18
  • Nov 24, 2009
  • #18
Never heard of anyone using a residual valve on rear discs, unless they are higher than the M/C or some such.. Using the correct power pedal. I guess all I can do is change the M/C and see what kind of difference it makes. Or test the pressure at each caliper, but I really don't feel like buying another tool. haha

Don't suppose there is an online calculator, or anyone knows the equation of piston bore to m/c bore to pedal travel?
 

67coupestang

Founding Member
May 31, 2002
509
2
19
45
Nov 25, 2009
#19
  • Nov 25, 2009
  • #19
ill chime in with my 98 explorer m/c im running brakes from a 73 on both ends, pedal feel is firm but not bad, but im not sure i would like it if the car was an automatic. the only problems i remember were finding adapters to the metric bungs
 

zm830101

New Member
May 16, 2005
116
0
0
warner robins, ga
Nov 26, 2009
#20
  • Nov 26, 2009
  • #20
67coupestang said:
ill chime in with my 98 explorer m/c im running brakes from a 73 on both ends, pedal feel is firm but not bad, but im not sure i would like it if the car was an automatic. the only problems i remember were finding adapters to the metric bungs
Click to expand...

are you using power brakes as well?
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
68 manual disc/drum master cylinder
  • Butchd88
  • May 27, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
80
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- May 27, 2026
Butchd88
B
O
1967 Manual Drum Brakes , replaced the master cylinder and the brake light switch but the brakes lights stay on.
  • OldNSloww
  • Jul 14, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
362
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jul 16, 2025
horse sence
J
For Sale MASTER LISTING: Abandoned '66 Mustang Restomod Part-Out (Wilwood, Ididit, Quick Performance, Mishimoto)
  • JasonB66
  • Jul 23, 2026
  • Suspension
Replies
0
Views
87
Suspension Jul 23, 2026
JasonB66
J
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?