• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Am I Being Too Ambitious?

  • Thread starter Thread starter andrewbr
  • Start date Start date Sep 25, 2013
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
A

andrewbr

New Member
Sep 25, 2013
5
0
2
Washington State
Sep 25, 2013
#1
  • Sep 25, 2013
  • #1
Hi all,

I am new to the forums and the Mustang community in general. Though I am a die hard Ford guy, I have never had the opportunity to own a Mustang...until now. I've always loved the 80s Mustangs and have oft dreamed of getting one of my own, and all of a sudden I am presented with an opportunity to pick one up for a bargain.





The vehicle is a 1983 Ford Mustang GT 5.0 hatchback with presumably 105,500 miles on it (it has ticked over such that it reads 05500, which I suppose could mean its possible it has either 205 or 305k on it as well but I'm being an optimist ). It also has what I presume is a 5-speed manual transmission.






The car appears a little rough from the outside, having a fair amount of missing or oxidized paint. The trim around the doors is dull and faded, as well as the bumpers. The rubber trim on the sides is warped and in need of replacement. However the car is fairly rust free and I didn't see any major areas where there was significant body damage, aside from a pretty crunched up area on the roof just in front of the hatch and some dings in the hood.




With regards to the interior, most of the dash pieces are broken in some way and in need of replacement/repair. The seats are decent though dirty (nothing seat covers couldn't fix) and the carpet may need to be replaced. It is also missing a head liner.






One of my buddies help me to get the car started, and it actually fired up relatively well for a car that had been sitting a while. Of course it put out a fair amount of white smoke but once it got going and idled down there was the occasional faint puff of white smoke out of each pipe (concern here?). It idled alright at around 500-600 RPM (indicated) and actually sounded pretty good when some throttle was applied. I did notice that the motor shook around a bit, wondering if this is a motor mount issue. I made sure to check the strut mast towers, and they looked to be in great shape. Apparently the carb that's on there is a fairly good one (so I'm told), it's a Holley 4 barrel (and I'll admit I don't know much about carbs, so I haven't the slightest clue with regards to more specs on it).

Random other thoughts/issues:
-Pretty cracked windshield
-Older, mismatched tires
-Door alignment/gaps are pretty messed up (easy enough to fix?)
-Broken motor mounts?

The thing is, this guy is probably willing to sell the car cheap. He basically got it for free and tends to have a lot of random vehicles sitting around and is always looking to get crap off his property. With decent bones and an apparently decent engine/drivetrain, it could be a good project. My two goals from posting this are the to figure out the following:

1. Is this car too rough to bring back to decent condition as a hobbyist's project? Or will it require much more work than I realize and just become a huge pain? Basically, should I run away screaming?

2. How little cash can I offer him without being insulting? I know the "what's it worth?" threads are frowned upon, but I promise this isn't a disguised attempt at getting my own car valued. I want to make a fair offer but I also have to be realistic in that I don't believe this car, in its current condition, is worth very much. But I need your thoughts.

Thanks all, excited to hear your feedback and thoughts.
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,776
6,933
214
SW Houston
Sep 25, 2013
#2
  • Sep 25, 2013
  • #2
The only major issue I see is the roof... Not sure it is repairable without getting a new skin for it. The rest is typical for a car that age, and can be fixed as you go as far as I see it. The price is hard to say, since you said the guy probably got it for close to free and probably wants it out of the way. Those two criteria will make it hard to say "you should offer him $$ and not $$$$" - my opinion at least.
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Sep 25, 2013
#3
  • Sep 25, 2013
  • #3
Its all relative.

How much does it cost? Outward appearances,..this should be 500.00 or less to considered a bargain.

How capable are you at doing what needs to be done?

If you have to pay somebody to do any of it,..it will bleed you quick.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Sep 25, 2013
#4
  • Sep 25, 2013
  • #4
Pass. Pre 86 cars are lacking in almost every dept and the money it would take to bring tat car back up to par would be more than double what its worth.
 
Reactions: Mustang5L5 and f8tlfiveo

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Sep 25, 2013
#5
  • Sep 25, 2013
  • #5
Don't walk away, run away.
 
Reactions: f8tlfiveo

f8tlfiveo

My wife likes my spool and blow-off valve.
Aug 8, 2007
1,585
102
64
Lancaster, PA
Sep 25, 2013
#6
  • Sep 25, 2013
  • #6
Save your money for one in better shape. I personally wouldn't go below 1986 because of fuel injection and the 8.8 rear end


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
A

andrewbr

New Member
Sep 25, 2013
5
0
2
Washington State
Sep 25, 2013
#7
  • Sep 25, 2013
  • #7
Thanks for the speedy replies. It's better to know in advance that this may not be the car for me than to buy it and find out later. I am fairly handy with cars but this may exceed my level of time and experience to make it a nice car without spending serious cash.

For the time being I will pass, but I don't see this car going anywhere soon. If I suddenly develop less sense I'm sure I can go make an offer on it later.

Also, if you're talking going 86 or newer, what year do you think was best? I heard the 86 had its own issues because it was the first year the vehicle was fuel injected. Thoughts?
 

85rkyboby

Active Member
Mar 2, 2011
923
96
39
South ATL
Sep 25, 2013
#8
  • Sep 25, 2013
  • #8
Some 85's were injected. Mine is carbed and I have put well over 4k into it and she's got a way to go. I didn't buy with the intent to sell or ever get rid of though.
 

Chuckman

GTFO you fat, heavy bastard
15 Year Member
Oct 21, 2005
1,604
1,002
173
st. louis, mo
Sep 25, 2013
#9
  • Sep 25, 2013
  • #9
what it really all boils down to, is what do you want out of it? the bones there are good enough to make a good roller for a full race car (since almost everything will get replaced by something better anyway, even with a better starting point), but as far as making a good resto project that's actually worth more than you paid for it, probably not really worth it, especially if it's likely to get put on the back burner for some time. that being said, almost everything there CAN be fixed/replaced/upgraded fairly easily, but its gonna start costing $$$.
 
Reactions: 85rkyboby

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Sep 25, 2013
#10
  • Sep 25, 2013
  • #10
P A S S on that thing unless you've got a garage, mechanical ability, lots of time, and lots of money. There's much more suitable running driving inspected cars out there for not much more money.


P A S S
 

85rkyboby

Active Member
Mar 2, 2011
923
96
39
South ATL
Sep 25, 2013
#11
  • Sep 25, 2013
  • #11
madspeed said:
P A S S on that thing unless you've got a garage, mechanical ability, lots of time, and lots of money. There's much more suitable running driving inspected cars out there for not much more money.


P A S S
Click to expand...
Agreed, unless you want one hell of a learning experience and pit to toss money. That's one good thing I can say is I know what must be every nut and bolt on the car. Ha-Ha.
 
A

andrewbr

New Member
Sep 25, 2013
5
0
2
Washington State
Sep 25, 2013
#12
  • Sep 25, 2013
  • #12
Was poking around locally and found the following: http://seattle.craigslist.org/tac/cto/4084950858.html

If only it were a manual...
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Sep 25, 2013
#13
  • Sep 25, 2013
  • #13
andrewbr said:
Thanks for the speedy replies. It's better to know in advance that this may not be the car for me than to buy it and find out later. I am fairly handy with cars but this may exceed my level of time and experience to make it a nice car without spending serious cash.

For the time being I will pass, but I don't see this car going anywhere soon. If I suddenly develop less sense I'm sure I can go make an offer on it later.

Also, if you're talking going 86 or newer, what year do you think was best? I heard the 86 had its own issues because it was the first year the vehicle was fuel injected. Thoughts?
Click to expand...
89-93 were the best years with 92-3 IMHO the best of the Fox offerings.
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Sep 25, 2013
#14
  • Sep 25, 2013
  • #14
IMO look at 89 and newer. Advantages over 86 and older

Mass Air vs SD on 87-88
8.8 rear vs 7.5 in older 80's cars
Better pistons 86 and older no notches and cannot use most aftermarket heads
Better heads- 86 and older have even worse E6's than E7's
Better brakes
Better interior
Larger front wheel wells for larger tires
5sp manual vs early 80's 4sp
EFI vs carb on 85 and older

Essentially you would have to spend a lot of money and time on an 86 and older just to get it to 87 and newer performance IMO. There is really no price difference between the years and these cars are abundant and cheap. Shop around and my advice is to buy the cleanest, most complete rust free car you can find that has not been hacked or ragged on.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Sep 25, 2013
#15
  • Sep 25, 2013
  • #15
If you really want a 4 eye the 86 isn't a bad platform. Quite a few have already been brought up to spec with their 87-93 counterparts. The biggest drawback there was the engine's flat top pistons and anemic cylinder heads.
 
A

andrewbr

New Member
Sep 25, 2013
5
0
2
Washington State
Sep 25, 2013
#16
  • Sep 25, 2013
  • #16
At the moment not a ton out there, and I don't have a ton of capitol to spend right now. This one is tempting though: http://portland.craigslist.org/clk/cto/4077544895.html
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Sep 25, 2013
#17
  • Sep 25, 2013
  • #17
The body kit on that car gives me the creeps and the interior is shot. If it runs well and is rust free I would offer 1800.
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Sep 25, 2013
#18
  • Sep 25, 2013
  • #18
imagine what the gt seats had to look like to swap in those lx seats. Needs a real good interior cleaning and a proper gt front bumper. Find out more info regarding engine and driveline
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Sep 25, 2013
#19
  • Sep 25, 2013
  • #19
andrewbr said:
At the moment not a ton out there, and I don't have a ton of capitol to spend right now. This one is tempting though: http://portland.craigslist.org/clk/cto/4077544895.html
Click to expand...

Aside from the butchered up body, if someone can't even bother to clean up the interior of the car they are trying to sell, that is a deal breaker for me. It goes to lack in pride of ownership. If the guy doesn't care enough to keep the car clean, he isn't taking care of things like maintenence. In addition those seats are so probably the ugliest ones I've seen in a long while.
 
A

andrewbr

New Member
Sep 25, 2013
5
0
2
Washington State
Sep 25, 2013
#20
  • Sep 25, 2013
  • #20
I agree that the car probably wasn't well cared for. Someone who doesn't think to list the mileage when listing a car obviously isn't too well in tune with cars. I agree the body kit is beyond awful and the interior needs help, but with a decent body and a potentially solid engine it might be a nice find. I'll get more info.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Could this part be identified?
  • MartinM
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
276
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 8, 2025
Shakerhood
S
Need a clutch, 1982 Capri RS 5.0 owner, am I allowed to participate?
  • scudzuki
  • Apr 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
523
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 7, 2025
Noobz347
S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
529
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
S
Help with window and possible engine
  • StefRena22
  • Jun 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
825
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2025
Willybill32
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
83
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?