• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Anderson N/A power pipe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter EPIK
  • Start date Start date Mar 30, 2009

EPIK

Member
Jul 3, 2004
796
1
16
LEFT COAST
Mar 30, 2009
#1
  • Mar 30, 2009
  • #1
I am getting ready to intsall a 76MM C&L maf on my car & was wondering if I should keep my crappy MAC cai or upgrade to a better inlet tube? I was looking into an 3 1/2" Anderson N/A powerpipe, but Im not sure if it will work with the C&L maf, or if its even worth upgrading to? Will this benefit a 300rwhp HCI car with a stock bottom end?

Anderson Ford Motorsport Home Page

It only says its for 73MM max flow, & 77MM bullet Maf's, but will it work with my 76MM C&L maf?

Any info????





The C&L inlet tubes look nice, but I dont want to use a stock airbox which it looks like thats what they have shown in the pic....


What do you guys think?
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Mar 30, 2009
#2
  • Mar 30, 2009
  • #2
i would say if youve got the cash go for it, you could also just make your own for alot cheaper with a couple of 90's and straight 3.5inch piping
 

EPIK

Member
Jul 3, 2004
796
1
16
LEFT COAST
Mar 30, 2009
#3
  • Mar 30, 2009
  • #3
90lxcoupe said:
i would say if youve got the cash go for it, you could also just make your own for alot cheaper with a couple of 90's and straight 3.5inch piping
Click to expand...

You mean with plastic piping? It will work just as good, but I want something that looks clean as well...
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 30, 2009
#4
  • Mar 30, 2009
  • #4
You can buy various sizes of steel and aluminum mandrel bent tubing. Take a look at my set up, I made it entirely of 3" and 4" exhaust components.



 

brian@afm

Site Sponsor
Jan 18, 2007
24
0
1
Mar 30, 2009
#5
  • Mar 30, 2009
  • #5
If the housing of the 76mm C&L is 3.5" on the inlet and 3" on the outlet (closest to the throttle body), then the #AF-0104C will work for you.
 

EPIK

Member
Jul 3, 2004
796
1
16
LEFT COAST
Mar 30, 2009
#6
  • Mar 30, 2009
  • #6
Gearbanger 101 said:
You can buy various sizes of steel and aluminum mandrel bent tubing. Take a look at my set up, I made it entirely of 3" and 4" exhaust components.



Click to expand...

Wow... That looks very clean. Thanks Gearbanger, I will look into getting something like this done...
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Aug 25, 2010
#7
  • Aug 25, 2010
  • #7
brian@afm said:
If the housing of the 76mm C&L is 3.5" on the inlet and 3" on the outlet (closest to the throttle body), then the #AF-0104C will work for you.
Click to expand...

Old thread I know, but question for Brian, why is it that the AFM-105C is not listed to work with the Pro-M 75mm bullet MAF?
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Aug 25, 2010
#8
  • Aug 25, 2010
  • #8
I wouldn't buy anything based on using that meter.
If you want to keep using it, that's fine.
But investing in something to match an inferior product just isn't worth the time or money IMO.
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Aug 25, 2010
#9
  • Aug 25, 2010
  • #9
I presume your talkin bout the c&l
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Aug 25, 2010
#10
  • Aug 25, 2010
  • #10
madspeed1 said:
I presume your talkin bout the c&l
Click to expand...

Yes.
While i like power pipes, they aren't cheap.
So investing in one should be for the last meter you are ever going to buy, and i assure you, if you want the best running and performing car, that's not a C&L.
You can go as big as you like with mass air meters, so me personally i'd be getting a 95mm PMAS meter. Then get a power pipe to go with it.

I bet with the sale of the C&L, the OP would spend less money on the new meter than he would on the power pipe and get more power.
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Aug 25, 2010
#11
  • Aug 25, 2010
  • #11
Don't mean to hijack this thread, but if I was to get the 3.5" AFM powerpipe, what would the ideal MAF and TB be??

If rest of combo matters, I have a 347, GT40X aluminums, 1.7 rockers, cobra intake, street toy, not daily driver. Currently have 75 mm tb and 75mm maf with a bbk cold air kit that i'd like to replace as its getting rusty!

oh, and NOT the car in my sig
 

Boostedpimp

20+ Year Stangneter
May 8, 2003
1,451
493
154
NJ
Aug 25, 2010
#12
  • Aug 25, 2010
  • #12
power pipe is worth the money in my opinion.. there was just this same question asked over on corral.net and some people posted up there power difference they seen on the dyno with and without there power pipes as well.
 

brian@afm

Site Sponsor
Jan 18, 2007
24
0
1
Aug 25, 2010
#13
  • Aug 25, 2010
  • #13
madspeed1 said:
Old thread I know, but question for Brian, why is it that the AFM-105C is not listed to work with the Pro-M 75mm bullet MAF?
Click to expand...

It's been our experience that when the 75 Bullet-style meter is placed out in the inner fenderwell, so far away from the throttle body, low speed drive-ability suffers quite a bit. The air pulse from the throttle body just isn't very strong. This is why our Power Pipe® that's made for the meter you speak of actually moves the mass air meter a little bit closer to the throttle body than even the stock location.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Aug 26, 2010
#14
  • Aug 26, 2010
  • #14
brian@afm said:
It's been our experience that when the 75 Bullet-style meter is placed out in the inner fenderwell, so far away from the throttle body, low speed drive-ability suffers quite a bit. The air pulse from the throttle body just isn't very strong. This is why our Power Pipe® that's made for the meter you speak of actually moves the mass air meter a little bit closer to the throttle body than even the stock location.
Click to expand...

Brian is 100% correct I did some testing years back when I was running a N/A set-up (I actually still think I am up on AFM's customer section). I tried the C&L with a Powerpipe in the fender and it would never work, barely ran. The pipe he lists will work with the C&L since it is positioned close to the TB.

I actually found the best results with the 76mm C&L was a stock airbox and paper filter. Did my testing at the track and it yielded me the best results with similar conditions and temps. At the same time I swapped on a AFM 4" NA Power Pipe and a 80mm Pro-M and picked up over .4 ET, and a few mph...obviously the PP and better reading meter was needed. Never looked back after that and was a true Powerpipe believer.

If your wondering if that pipe and meter combo are too large, my car made 340RWHP at the time and ran high 11's.

Since the 80MM is older technolgy I'd go 4" AFM pipe with a 95mm PMAS meter, or I know Pro-M re-opened and they may still carry the 80mm units.
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Aug 26, 2010
#15
  • Aug 26, 2010
  • #15
OK, so when is someone going to make an intake plenum that is "turned" to alleviate the need for the stupid looking elbow coming off the throttle body??!
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Aug 26, 2010
#16
  • Aug 26, 2010
  • #16
Hey Rick, it's been a long while. You still doing subframe connectors and torque boxes?
 

Cobra912

Active Member
May 1, 2005
1,777
11
39
Wish I was anywhere but here
Aug 26, 2010
#17
  • Aug 26, 2010
  • #17
I ran a 75mm Pro-M bullet with a power pipe on my 331 without issue and then to my now 80mm Pro-M shorty, still works great
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Aug 26, 2010
#18
  • Aug 26, 2010
  • #18
Which powerpipe were you using with the 75 Bullet? Did it fit in the fenderwell ok?
 

S&B

I hate my CT. :(
10 Year Member
Dec 18, 2005
1,634
695
204
Cheesehead
Aug 26, 2010
#19
  • Aug 26, 2010
  • #19
I had one on my 331 N/A combo i just liked it because it is very well built and looked great, when I sold it used on ebay i got almost all my money back as well
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Aug 27, 2010
#20
  • Aug 27, 2010
  • #20
madspeed1 said:
Hey Rick, it's been a long while. You still doing subframe connectors and torque boxes?
Click to expand...

Yeah I can make just about anything, build motors, complete cars, engine and chassis dyno testing and tuning available as well RNH Performance -Street and Race Engines, Custom Fabrication
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
  • Locked
Digital Tuning A9l issue or something else
  • Tufgriz
  • Sep 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
280
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 11, 2025
Noobz347
T
Fuel Looking for a little guidance
  • Tufgriz
  • Sep 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
343
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 12, 2025
Noobz347
Fox Intake tube suggestions
  • sav22rem22
  • Nov 22, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
801
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 23, 2023
qikgts
Ford MAF w/C&L 76mm housing
  • Rxbandits
  • Jan 8, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
38
Views
7K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 23, 2020
Mstng93SSP
MSpnp2 base tune review please
  • Trogdor
  • Nov 6, 2020
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
6
Views
3K
Digital Self-tuning Forum Apr 8, 2021
Trogdor
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?