• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Another Carb size thread?? 570 or 670 Street Avenger?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 84convertablegt
  • Start date Start date Dec 7, 2008

84convertablegt

New Member
Nov 6, 2004
589
0
0
Columbus, OH
Dec 7, 2008
#1
  • Dec 7, 2008
  • #1
I've read and read and searched and searched and I can't make up my mind. I've ran the Holley S.A. 670 on 2 stock 302's and they both ran good, even though I know they were over carbed with that 670.

On my current 64.5 Mustang, I am trying to figure out which one to go with. Here's my setup.
-Stock 65 289 block
-AFR 165 Aluminum heads
-Comp Cams 268HE cam
-Cobra stage 2 289 intake
-C4 Auto (stock stall)
-Stock rear gears (for now)

Should I go with the 570 or 670 street avenger? The holley website recommends both, and the 80457 600cfm 4160, which I don't care for. I would think the 570 would give better throttle response, I'm just afraid of running out of steam with the AFR heads and cam.

Please give me a recommendation based on experience and carburetor expertise, not just because you've had one or the other. Thanks
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 7, 2008
#2
  • Dec 7, 2008
  • #2
Cobra Stage II intake? Where'd that come from? Run the 670. Or if you prefer the classic Holley look, the 80783 650 VS. This is basically the 670 but with the older finish
 

84convertablegt

New Member
Nov 6, 2004
589
0
0
Columbus, OH
Dec 7, 2008
#3
  • Dec 7, 2008
  • #3
D.Hearne said:
Cobra Stage II intake? Where'd that come from? Run the 670. Or if you prefer the classic Holley look, the 80783 650 VS. This is basically the 670 but with the older finish
Click to expand...
The Cobra intake I'm referring to is the repro 289 Hipo manifold. I guess "stage 2" was my substitution for "hi rise dual plane". I'll have to check out the 80783. Does it have the same jets?
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 7, 2008
#4
  • Dec 7, 2008
  • #4
If not the same jetting, it'll be within a size or two. Doesn't matter anyway in that regard, you can always change that if need be. The O.E. Hi-po manifold was the same low-rise iron unit the std 289 4bbl's had. The "Cobra" aluminum high rise is just one version of several, the others being the C9OX, Edelbrock F4B and the current Ford Racing A321. Weiand's older Stealth was a mirror image of these wth runners reversed as opposed to the layout of the others.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Dec 7, 2008
#5
  • Dec 7, 2008
  • #5
my recommendation would to use the 670 street avenger carb with your combination. you wont notice any loss in low end response, and you will notice a slight gain in top end power. fuel economy will be about the same with either carb. oddly enough i am going to be running a slightly more radical combination than yours, but i am going to use a 480cfm autolight carb because i want the added fuel economy. i may swap later to a 500cfm edelbrock carb though if the autolite doesnt work as well as i think it might.
 

Decurion

Member
Sep 28, 2006
353
0
16
Livonia, MI
Dec 7, 2008
#6
  • Dec 7, 2008
  • #6
With your stock stall and stock gears (2.79?), Ill say go with the 570. Ill also say go with an Edelbrock Performer RPM or RPM Air Gap intake. From what Ive seen, they flow among the best for a dual plane without giving up any low end power.
 

84convertablegt

New Member
Nov 6, 2004
589
0
0
Columbus, OH
Dec 7, 2008
#7
  • Dec 7, 2008
  • #7
D.Hearne said:
The "Cobra" aluminum high rise is just one version of several, the others being the C9OX, Edelbrock F4B and the current Ford Racing A321. Weiand's older Stealth was a mirror image of these wth runners reversed as opposed to the layout of the others.
Click to expand...
You know what I meant. I have the "Cobra" high rise. At any rate, I just spent $300 on my new SA670 on ebay, so I should be up and running in about a week.

Decurion said:
Ill also say go with an Edelbrock Performer RPM or RPM Air Gap intake .
Click to expand...
The intake I have is very similar to the Performer RPM. Just like D.Hearne said, many different intakes, all similar. The RPM is Edelbrocks newer version of the F4B. They are all hi rise dual plane aluminum manifolds.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 8, 2008
#8
  • Dec 8, 2008
  • #8
The RPM isn't a newer version of the F4B. True, they're both high rise dual planes, but they have different runner layouts. The Cobra HR & the F4B have unequal length runners where the RPM's have equal length runners.
 

84convertablegt

New Member
Nov 6, 2004
589
0
0
Columbus, OH
Dec 8, 2008
#9
  • Dec 8, 2008
  • #9
wow
 

Decurion

Member
Sep 28, 2006
353
0
16
Livonia, MI
Dec 8, 2008
#10
  • Dec 8, 2008
  • #10
84convertablegt said:
The intake I have is very similar to the Performer RPM. Just like D.Hearne said, many different intakes, all similar. The RPM is Edelbrocks newer version of the F4B. They are all hi rise dual plane aluminum manifolds.
Click to expand...

Similar maybe, but I bet you would pick up at least 10lb-ft of torque right off idle, and at least as much horsepower (probably more) all the way to redline with either of the RPM intakes, more with the air gap.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
908
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
F
carb vs cam help needed
  • forango
  • May 2, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
37
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 22, 2025
forango
F
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
9
1/8th Mile Time?
  • 93lx308
  • Jan 12, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 23, 2018
RangerJoe
Engine Thinking About 351, Need Some Help
  • derekleee
  • Oct 10, 2016
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 11, 2016
derekleee
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?