• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Any gain going from shorties to longtubes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BelueLX
  • Start date Start date Jan 20, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

BelueLX

Founding Member
Jul 10, 1999
1,195
1
0
Jan 20, 2004
#1
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #1
My car has Mac shorties, a custom 2.5" H-pipe and flowmaster mufflers. Will I see any gain going with longtubes, a 3" pipe and 3" race bullet style exhaust? I dont want to spend the money if its just going to be louder.
 
5

5.0hatch

New Member
Jan 24, 2003
150
0
0
Jan 20, 2004
#2
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #2
I gained 3mph by going from longtubes to shorties. I think mine was a rare case though
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jan 20, 2004
#3
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #3
Well with you having a supercharger feeding all that extra air in you need to get it out...so I would say yes

David
 

ECU5.0

Banned
Jan 10, 2004
1,803
1
0
raleigh, nc
Jan 20, 2004
#4
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #4
yea, the long tubes help with cars with power adders like a super charger or a huge shot of nitrous. i was thinkin about gettin long tubes for my car...but was talked out of it because i was told that id lose a lot of low end power....dont know the truth behind that...but oh well.
 
S

Silentst2000

New Member
Sep 28, 2003
145
0
0
Jan 20, 2004
#5
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #5
I was under the impression you gain lowend torque with long tubes?
 

ECU5.0

Banned
Jan 10, 2004
1,803
1
0
raleigh, nc
Jan 20, 2004
#6
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #6
me too....but im not sure...since i dont know that much about them
 

cevtv

Founding Member
Sep 15, 2002
1,113
0
37
Massachusetts
Jan 20, 2004
#7
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #7
Silentst2000 said:
I was under the impression you gain lowend torque with long tubes?
Click to expand...



 
0

00 Red SS

New Member
Jan 22, 2003
270
1
0
Grain Valley, MO
Jan 20, 2004
#8
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #8
I thought w/long tubes you lose a lil low end but get the horsepower in the upper rpm's.
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Jan 20, 2004
#9
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #9
I had my car dynoed after longtubes and I didnt lose anything at any rpm. I gained across the board. I switched from shorties to LTs.
 

cevtv

Founding Member
Sep 15, 2002
1,113
0
37
Massachusetts
Jan 20, 2004
#10
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #10
00 Red SS said:
I thought w/long tubes you lose a lil low end but get the horsepower in the upper rpm's.
Click to expand...

It's a myth - total
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Jan 20, 2004
#11
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #11
cevtv said:
It's a myth - total
Click to expand...


The MYTH is losing power down low. You will see power go up (torque/hp) across the entire RPM range. The average # are higher and the peak is higher also.
 

cevtv

Founding Member
Sep 15, 2002
1,113
0
37
Massachusetts
Jan 20, 2004
#12
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #12
mike keirstead said:
The MYTH is losing power down low. You will see power go up (torque/hp) across the entire RPM range. The average # are higher and the peak is higher also.
Click to expand...


You are correct - I should have stated that better.
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Jan 20, 2004
#13
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #13
cevtv said:
You are correct - I should have stated that better.
Click to expand...


I was backing you up....no worries man
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Jan 20, 2004
#14
  • Jan 20, 2004
  • #14
5.0hatch said:
I gained 3mph by going from longtubes to shorties. I think mine was a rare case though
Click to expand...


2 mph here. It is not uncommon.
 
W

wildstang347

New Member
Jan 2, 2004
83
0
0
Jan 21, 2004
#15
  • Jan 21, 2004
  • #15
full length headers have a better scavenging effect allowing the hot gases 2 maintane a higher velocity to the collector in a way actually helping pull spent gases from the combustion chamber, allowing your motor to make more power across entire RPM range like mike k. quoted.
i run the housler series (stepped) headers wich are a little more expensive, but have seen an significant improvement to warrant the extra cost.
 

GAU89LXStang

New Member
Feb 12, 2003
132
0
0
Jan 21, 2004
#16
  • Jan 21, 2004
  • #16
LTs all the way!! But definetely get the ceramic coated ones. And from everything I have seen, heard and read LTs give you more torque down low with a slight HP loss down low. The main reason alot of people don't run them is they can be pricey and a PITA to install. Note that I said CAN BE, not all are. But you get what you pay for.

Wie Spats,
Mo' Town
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Jan 21, 2004
#17
  • Jan 21, 2004
  • #17
AXIStang said:
My car has Mac shorties, a custom 2.5" H-pipe and flowmaster mufflers. Will I see any gain going with longtubes, a 3" pipe and 3" race bullet style exhaust? I dont want to spend the money if its just going to be louder.
Click to expand...


I would stay with the 2.5 inch exhaust.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Jan 21, 2004
#18
  • Jan 21, 2004
  • #18
I went from Mac shorties to Mac longtubes, and a Mac cattewd H to a mac prochamber. With pulleys also added the car went from a 13.89 to a 13.05... and from 98 mph to 103 mph. Any loss in power is a total myth as there was no SOTP feel after the pulleys, but after the exhaust the car felt new.
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Jan 21, 2004
#19
  • Jan 21, 2004
  • #19
25thmustang said:
I went from Mac shorties to Mac longtubes, and a Mac cattewd H to a mac prochamber. With pulleys also added the car went from a 13.89 to a 13.05... and from 98 mph to 103 mph. Any loss in power is a total myth as there was no SOTP feel after the pulleys, but after the exhaust the car felt new.
Click to expand...

That's a huge increase. Did you change anything else on the car. IE traction, suspension, gears......anything. That is a really big increase for just exhaust. Maybe your CATS were plugged or something. I don't doubt it though. I noticed a difference. I just wish it was as big as you.

I saw 2.1 mph and 2/10. I was happy.

The longtube power loss IS NOT TRUE. I saw it over a year ago on a dyno.

AXIStang----get the longtubes. But stay with the 2 1/2 piping.
 
S

Silentst2000

New Member
Sep 28, 2003
145
0
0
Jan 21, 2004
#20
  • Jan 21, 2004
  • #20
The only way I can see LT's could loose power on the low end but pushing it up would be using headers with too large of pipeing for the rated power level.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Need MIL Eliminators?
  • crazyone64
  • May 18, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
154
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 21, 2026
GOvert
G
Custom tune?
  • Nostang25
  • Jul 13, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
597
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 17, 2025
FastDriver
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
710
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
G
Quiet my 2015 GT on the cheap
  • gsrblack
  • Feb 12, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
6
Views
772
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Apr 16, 2025
gkomo
D
Exhaust Bbk mid pipe and flowmaster catback fitment issues?
  • dqureshi06
  • Jun 8, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
987
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 15, 2024
dqureshi06
D
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?