• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Engine Any gains from Cobra MAF and larger TB?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Blue_67Vert
  • Start date Start date May 5, 2021
B

Blue_67Vert

Member
Sep 25, 2016
24
6
13
May 5, 2021
#1
  • May 5, 2021
  • #1
This engine is in my ’67 Mustang.
5.0HO, Ford EFI (A9P), MAF, Stock intake manifold, EGR, no other smog equipment (no cats), underdrive pullies, elec. fan, No PS, no AC, shorty headers, 2.25” exhaust, AOD, 3.55 LS Rear

I already have a Cobra MAF in my parts bin. TB I will have to buy.

I do have other parts that benefit from the larger MAF/TB but I am not planning to install them any time soon. GT40Y303 Heads, Explorer Intake (external EGR), E303 cam (TBD whether to use use the E cam or keep the stock HO cam).

So my question is, would I see any gains installing the just the MAF/TB in the short term?
 
Last edited: May 5, 2021

KRUISR

10 Year Member
Apr 16, 2015
1,819
927
143
May 5, 2021
#2
  • May 5, 2021
  • #2
I would think MAF/TB on otherwise all stock engine, maybe a couple HP. Intake and heads are your biggest bottleneck.

For a few more (and still keep a simple swap), put the Explorer intakes on, 65mm (cheap one from an Explorer with a very simple conversion to work on Mustang) or 70mm TB and MAF.

When I first got my car back on the road, I had a stock long block (bottom end, E7 heads and cam) with 1.7RRs, Explorer intakes and 19lb injectors, Explorer TB (65mm), stock EGR, C&L 73mm MAF and shorty headers, full 2.5" exhaust with cats, 3G alt and electric fans. I am a A9P computer and AOD as well (3.73 gears though). It was a fun drive and I believe (no dyno to prove) I was 275-285 HP at the crank (about 240 at wheels). Horsepower estimates based on speed/RPMS at end of a 1/4 mile run and weight of the car crunched through online calculators.
 
Reactions: Blue_67Vert

deathb4dismount

Crap, didn’t realize my crotch was in that picture
15 Year Member
Oct 6, 2011
1,031
502
164
THE BUCKET
May 5, 2021
#3
  • May 5, 2021
  • #3
KRUISR said:
I would think MAF/TB on otherwise all stock engine, maybe a couple HP. Intake and heads are your biggest bottleneck.

For a few more (and still keep a simple swap), put the Explorer intakes on, 65mm (cheap one from an Explorer with a very simple conversion to work on Mustang) or 70mm TB and MAF.

When I first got my car back on the road, I had a stock long block (bottom end, E7 heads and cam) with 1.7RRs, Explorer intakes and 19lb injectors, Explorer TB (65mm), stock EGR, C&L 73mm MAF and shorty headers, full 2.5" exhaust with cats, 3G alt and electric fans. I am a A9P computer and AOD as well (3.73 gears though). It was a fun drive and I believe (no dyno to prove) I was 275-285 HP at the crank (about 240 at wheels). Horsepower estimates based on speed/RPMS at end of a 1/4 mile run and weight of the car crunched through online calculators.
Click to expand...
That’s a generous estimate
 

KRUISR

10 Year Member
Apr 16, 2015
1,819
927
143
May 5, 2021
#4
  • May 5, 2021
  • #4
You try then... 3750 lbs, 4600 RPM, (calcs to 96 MPH - same as speedo), launch off idle, 3.73s, 26.2" tire. Try various calculators and what do you get?

Current setup ... 3750 lbs, 4950 RPM (calcs to 103 MPH), launch off idle, 3.73s, 26.2" tires. I get 330-350 range.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
May 5, 2021
#5
  • May 5, 2021
  • #5
To run the Cobra MAF, you really need 24# injectors and the cobra ECU as well. It’s a matched combo. It won’t Work with the A9P.

with the stock intake, I wouldn’t bother. Buy a TB and instal when you do your intake.
 
Reactions: 2000xp8, General karthief and KRUISR

deathb4dismount

Crap, didn’t realize my crotch was in that picture
15 Year Member
Oct 6, 2011
1,031
502
164
THE BUCKET
May 5, 2021
#6
  • May 5, 2021
  • #6
KRUISR said:
You try then... 3750 lbs, 4600 RPM, (calcs to 96 MPH - same as speedo), launch off idle, 3.73s, 26.2" tire. Try various calculators and what do you get?

Current setup ... 3750 lbs, 4950 RPM (calcs to 103 MPH), launch off idle, 3.73s, 26.2" tires. I get 330-350 range.
Click to expand...

220ish
 
B

Blue_67Vert

Member
Sep 25, 2016
24
6
13
May 6, 2021
#7
  • May 6, 2021
  • #7
Mustang5L5 said:
To run the Cobra MAF, you really need 24# injectors and the cobra ECU as well. It’s a matched combo. It won’t Work with the A9P.

with the stock intake, I wouldn’t bother. Buy a TB and instal when you do your intake.
Click to expand...
I thought the injector tune was in the ECU. The Cobra ECU is programmed for 24# injectors. A9P is programmed for 19# injectors.

The MAF just measures the airflow and reports that the ECU. The Cobra MAF could be used with the A9P and 19# injectors, which is what I was planning to do.
 
Last edited: May 6, 2021

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
May 6, 2021
#8
  • May 6, 2021
  • #8
Blue_67Vert said:
I thought the injector tune was in the ECU. The Cobra ECU is programmed for 24# injectors. A9P is programmed for 19# injectors.

The MAF just measures the airflow and reports that the ECU. The Cobra MAF could be used with the A9P and 19# injectors, which is what I was planning to do.
Click to expand...

You are right except the standard 5.0 55mm MAF and the Cobra 70mm MAF have different MAF transfer curves. The reason for this is because the 1993 Cobra MAF was actually taken from the 1992-95 Thunderbird Supercoupe, so the calibration was different for the SC. Ford just compensated in the ECU programming.

What that means is that at the same flow through the MAF, you are going to have two different output values between the two meters.

So they are a matched set that cannot be interchanged without tuning

A9P + 19# + 55mm MAF

X3W + 24# + Cobra 70mm MAF

If you want to run 24# injectors, you either need a tune for the ECU, or an aftermarket MAF calibrated for 24's
 

KRUISR

10 Year Member
Apr 16, 2015
1,819
927
143
May 6, 2021
#9
  • May 6, 2021
  • #9
I don't have the dimensions in front of me, what is the ID of the flow tube on the Cobra MAF? Also what is OD of flow tube?

 
B

Blue_67Vert

Member
Sep 25, 2016
24
6
13
May 6, 2021
#10
  • May 6, 2021
  • #10
My 19# injectors are new. Those are staying. I was going to
Mustang5L5 said:
You are right except the standard 5.0 55mm MAF and the Cobra 70mm MAF have different MAF transfer curves. ,,,,

What that means is that at the same flow through the MAF, you are going to have two different output values between the two meters ,,,,

If you want to run 24# injectors, you either need a tune for the ECU, or an aftermarket MAF calibrated for 24's
Click to expand...
No bueno for me. But that makes sense.
I was mostly looking to add the MAF and TB ahead of installing the Intakes and Heads so as to not introduce so many changes at once.
My 19# injectors are new and are staying.
Thanks for the explanation.
 
Last edited: May 6, 2021
B

Blue_67Vert

Member
Sep 25, 2016
24
6
13
May 6, 2021
#11
  • May 6, 2021
  • #11
KRUISR said:
I don't have the dimensions in front of me, what is the ID of the flow tube on the Cobra MAF? Also what is OD of flow tube?

Click to expand...
Front: ID 80mm, OD 91
Rear: ID 73mm, OD 80mm
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
May 7, 2021
#12
  • May 7, 2021
  • #12
If you stil with the 19# injectors, you can use a 94-95 Mustang MAF. It’s a 70mm MAF as well but it’s transfer curves are close to that of a fox. I believe you can use a 91-93 cougar/tbird MAF too as it has a flange that will mount in the stock fox airbox. The 94-95 MAF needs an adapter flange to work.

I also think you can take the 94-95 electronics and install them in the 93 cobra housing as the 70mm MAF internals are the same between the MAFs listed. This is unconfirmed though.

Stamped on the electronics is a code such as AH55 or AH70 indicating they are meant for a specific meter size. Back in the 80's and 90's, Ford did standardize a few of the meters other than flanges and bosses for specific mounting in certain vehicles. Because of this, i do believe there is some interchangeability with the housings. The electronics, however, must be compatible with the ECU

I’ve run a 94-95 GT MAF with adapter flange on my car with A9L and 19s for a few years now. Runs beautifully.
 
Last edited: May 7, 2021
Reactions: Blue_67Vert and General karthief

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
May 7, 2021
#13
  • May 7, 2021
  • #13
Just to expand, and go slightly off topic.

This is a 95 Thunderbird MAF. The electronics on this are useless to us Mustang/302 folk, but the housing is virtually identical to the 1993 Cobra MAF. It's a 70MM unit, has the correct inlet/outlet configuration and even the 3-post mounting (that usually isn't used). I am aware of one person who took this housing, and installed a 94-95 Mustang MAF electronics on top and ended up using it.

Mass Air Flow MAF 70MM 4.6L 1994 1995 Thunderbird Cougar | eBay

Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Mass Air Flow MAF 70MM 4.6L 1994 1995 Thunderbird Cougar at the best online prices at eBay! Free shipping for many products!
www.ebay.com

Here is a 94-95 Mustang. The internal features are the same as the above t-bird MAF and the cobra MAF, but you can see it uses a different mounting flange. The electronics however do match up and function with the A9x ECU however. I am using this exact MAF, with an adapter flange. However if i had found a check tbird housing (above) i would have made the swap.

Used examples can be had rather cheap, and the adapter is usually $10-20.

For Ford Mustang 94-95 Standard Blue Streak Remanufactured Mass Air Flow Sensor 91769139834 | eBay

Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for For Ford Mustang 94-95 Standard Blue Streak Remanufactured Mass Air Flow Sensor at the best online prices at eBay! Free shipping for many products!
www.ebay.com


What makes it pricey is mixing and matching the housings and electrnics. In your car, with the 93 cobra MAF, i think all you need to do is track down the 94-95 electronics and swap it on.

I do have my 94-95 SN95 MAF off the car, and can get a measurement later to confirm it does match the 93 cobra MAF diameters.

The 94-95 Mustang MAF electronics are F2VF-12B579-A2A. This was used on a few cars in the early 90's. The housings unfortunately don't have unique part numbers.
 
Reactions: General karthief
B

Blue_67Vert

Member
Sep 25, 2016
24
6
13
May 7, 2021
#14
  • May 7, 2021
  • #14
Thanks for the info. I'll probably just sell the complete Cobra MAF and ECU together since they are matched. That should fund a SN95 MAF and TB and maybe even an intake manifold. The Exploder intake I have now is non-EGR and I will probably want to keep the EGR.
 

KRUISR

10 Year Member
Apr 16, 2015
1,819
927
143
May 7, 2021
#15
  • May 7, 2021
  • #15

Actually looking for dims on the flow tube (circled above).

I did some quick math and the 70mm pictured above might only be marginally bigger than the stocker. The tube width and ID can help me finish off those calcs.
 
B

Blue_67Vert

Member
Sep 25, 2016
24
6
13
May 7, 2021
#16
  • May 7, 2021
  • #16
KRUISR said:

Actually looking for dims on the flow tube (circled above).

I did some quick math and the 70mm pictured above might only be marginally bigger than the stocker. The tube width and ID can help me finish off those calcs.
Click to expand...
thingies aren't long enough to measure ID perfectly, gauge not exactly perpendicular, but I get ID 9.75 OD 11mm
 

KRUISR

10 Year Member
Apr 16, 2015
1,819
927
143
May 7, 2021
#17
  • May 7, 2021
  • #17
Hmmm. I thought they were wider.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Catch Can or not?
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
366
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 6, 2026
ctandc
C
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
868
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1999–2004 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
920
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
907
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?