• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

any good how 2's on mounting battery in trunk?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AquaTeen2004
  • Start date Start date Oct 17, 2007

AquaTeen2004

New Member
Nov 12, 2005
0
0
0
Georgia
Oct 17, 2007
#1
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #1
looking to do this soon. cant be that hard can it?
 

Jenns01TA

Active Member
Mar 31, 2005
37
0
36
Oct 17, 2007
#2
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #2
Can't find a specific how to for the 05-08, but here is a how to link for the Steeda relocation kit on a 96 Mystic 'Bra. You can probably use your imagination for the subtle differences in the platforms.

http://www.stangpro.com/html/articles/batteryrelocation.htm
 

AquaTeen2004

New Member
Nov 12, 2005
0
0
0
Georgia
Oct 17, 2007
#3
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #3
thanks bud! that helps alot.
 
K

kenaimone

Member
Jun 8, 2004
85
0
6
Oct 17, 2007
#4
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #4
alot of people i talk to say to stay away from it. consider this, the battery is on the right side now and also set back in the engine bay. if you are from the school that beleives every little bit helps than go ahead. but i have been advised against it. these cars are much better balanced than their predasseors
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Oct 17, 2007
#5
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #5
These cars are still a bit nose heavy, so moving it to the rear wouldn't hurt. But I think side to side, they're well balanced, so I'd probably keep it on the same side.
 

Jenns01TA

Active Member
Mar 31, 2005
37
0
36
Oct 17, 2007
#6
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #6
Yep. 200+ pounds heavier than the rear. Side to side well balanced and considering the LSD I agree with DarkFire, keep it on the Rt. side.
 

AquaTeen2004

New Member
Nov 12, 2005
0
0
0
Georgia
Oct 17, 2007
#7
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #7
i wouldn't bother with it but im removing alot of weight from the back of the car. i think it will help alot with the 4.10s.
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Oct 17, 2007
#8
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #8
AquaTeen2004 said:
i wouldn't bother with it but im removing alot of weight from the back of the car. i think it will help alot with the 4.10s.
Click to expand...

Why would that help with 4.10's, if you don't mind me asking? The car is already nose heavy. Removing more weight from the front puts even less weight on the tires, reducing traction. Weight reduction is good, but you've gotta remove it in the right places. Swaybar delete, lighter radiator, lighter radiator support, k member, and a arms would all help you lose weight and correct the weight ratio. If you do all or some of that, then removing weight from the back would help. Drag springs would help transfer the weight to the rear properly. But, unless you know something that I don't, just pulling weight from the rear will not help you get traction. You'll get higher trap speeds but your ETs will improve more by removing weight the way I suggested.
 

AquaTeen2004

New Member
Nov 12, 2005
0
0
0
Georgia
Oct 17, 2007
#9
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #9
sorry..i ment the weight of the battery in the trunk would help with traction
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Oct 17, 2007
#10
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #10
Ohhhh gotcha!

If you are removing trunk weight, I would also consider the other mods I listed. They all reduce weight from the front, and help with weight transfer on launch.
 

Jenns01TA

Active Member
Mar 31, 2005
37
0
36
Oct 18, 2007
#11
  • Oct 18, 2007
  • #11
I was starting to get a little concerned around here with folks dropping rear weight. I think this would have been the 3rd or 4th thread (in as many days) where I was preaching about the 53/47 stock weight distribution. hahahahhaha.... Thanks for taking that pulpit up for me in this thread Dark.
 

DarkFireGT

Playing with my wife's really makes me want one.
10 Year Member
May 23, 2004
692
10
89
East Moline, IL
Oct 18, 2007
#12
  • Oct 18, 2007
  • #12
No problem
 
K

kenaimone

Member
Jun 8, 2004
85
0
6
Oct 18, 2007
#13
  • Oct 18, 2007
  • #13
you guys have me confused. why would you even consider putting the battery on the lt side. with the tortion of the motor the right rear has much more weight than the lt on a hard launch. if you have to have to put the battery in the trunk that is the only place to pull it. have you ever seen a car pull just a right wheel off the gound on a launch. maybe if you were road racing this would make sense. i am confused.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

3
Rear mounted battery distribution blocks?
  • 387lx
  • Mar 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
310
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 14, 2026
JD1964
E
2007 GT Stalls when lights or a/c turned on
  • ejscarfo
  • Jun 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
137
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jun 29, 2026
ejscarfo
E
G
Electrical Getting good ground in 1991 Fox Vert for amps - getting popping noise when I turn on the lights?
  • gvanginkel403
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
458
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 21, 2026
gvanginkel403
G
C
Stock 1993 charging issue at idle
  • Charlie1
  • Sep 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
333
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 24, 2025
Mustang5L5
Fox Good shop in Washington state or Oregon
  • keel
  • May 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
118
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2026
keel
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?