• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Any opinions on clutch to handle 500WHP?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pokageek
  • Start date Start date Apr 5, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Apr 5, 2007
#1
  • Apr 5, 2007
  • #1
I don't want a clutch that is like a truck. Takes all the fun of driving right out the window. Thanks. :SNSign:

BTW I think there was something called a spec stage II I ws looking at but is it a pain to use? Hehe between a rough clutch and dog rings, I have seen people end up hating their cars overnight.
 

kck6894

Advanced Member
Mar 18, 2004
0
0
66
Paradise
Apr 5, 2007
#2
  • Apr 5, 2007
  • #2
I used a spec stage 3+ for a couple of years. I didn't have any complaints about it on the street.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Apr 5, 2007
#3
  • Apr 5, 2007
  • #3
It wasn't difficult to push in in traffic and stuff? Gforce recommends no more than a spec II BTW.
 

Wi Stang

Member
Jun 27, 2004
248
0
16
Fountain City, WI
Apr 5, 2007
#4
  • Apr 5, 2007
  • #4
I run the Spec Stage 3+ right now too. I've had it for a little over a year, and I don't have anything bad to say about it. I drive the car pretty much every day in the summer.
I am know the clutch is harder to push in than a stock clutch, but I am not too sure how much. I went from an automatic to a manual with this clutch, so I have no reference.
It seems to have pretty good street manners though. I don't have any chatter or undesirable side effects from running it.
 

kck6894

Advanced Member
Mar 18, 2004
0
0
66
Paradise
Apr 5, 2007
#5
  • Apr 5, 2007
  • #5
Pokageek said:
It wasn't difficult to push in in traffic and stuff? Gforce recommends no more than a spec II BTW.
Click to expand...

I don't live in a place with lots of traffic, but normal day to day driving it's always worked well.
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Apr 5, 2007
#6
  • Apr 5, 2007
  • #6
I went with a custom clutch from Pro Motion and I love it. The SPEC stage 2 is great, but I wouldn't recommend it with 500+HP. Unless you're running a weak trans, then the stage 2 might keep you from breaking something.
 
R

Rock777

Member
Aug 22, 2004
195
1
16
Troy, IL
Apr 5, 2007
#7
  • Apr 5, 2007
  • #7
I have the Spec Stg. II on my car now. I am happy with it, it's definitely more on/off than the stock clutch, but not too bad.

I had a Center Force Dual-Friction in my 89 and was very happy with it. It drove very smooth, easy engagement, absolutely not chatter, and is built to hold a decent amount of power.

I've never had the Spec III, but would imagine they could be kinda brutal for everyday driving, plus they are definitely harder on tranny's if yours isn't beefed up.

If I were to buy a new clutch tomorrow though, it would be the CF Dual Friction!
 

parchisi

New Member
Apr 13, 2006
519
1
0
New Mexico
Apr 5, 2007
#8
  • Apr 5, 2007
  • #8
I got a regular Spec Stage 3 and its pretty tricky to drive. When I let other people drive my car, the usually have problems, but I'm used to it now and I can drive around in heavy traffic no problem. I've heard the 3+ is much more street friendly though and is actually stronger than the regular Stage 3.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Apr 5, 2007
#9
  • Apr 5, 2007
  • #9
do you think you'll make 500 at the wheels?

as you know, i went with a 4R70W auto.
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
Apr 5, 2007
#10
  • Apr 5, 2007
  • #10
what trans?
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Apr 5, 2007
#11
  • Apr 5, 2007
  • #11
No I will not make 500 at the wheels. I am saying WHP not RWHP. Now...if I decide to s/c..well lookout.

I will go with gforce b/c it is a straight forward install and everything else is such a butt pain to install including all sorts of potential vibration problems, etc...that I dont feel like weeding out.
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
Apr 5, 2007
#12
  • Apr 5, 2007
  • #12
Pokageek said:
No I will not make 500 at the wheels. I am saying WHP not RWHP. Now...if I decide to s/c..well lookout.

I will go with gforce b/c it is a straight forward install and everything else is such a butt pain to install including all sorts of potential vibration problems, etc...that I dont feel like weeding out.
Click to expand...

i would ask whoever is making the trans then. alot of those guys have local clutch makers that they swear by. we have one here in town that everyone raves over.

being that it is still a t5 you might want to consider something out of the ford racing catalog.
 
9

95.0Stang

Member
Feb 20, 2003
538
1
18
Kansas
Apr 5, 2007
#13
  • Apr 5, 2007
  • #13
I am looking to replace my clutch in the next 6 months and I want a clutch with the lightest pedal, but with the most holding power. I wont be puching 500hp soon, but in the next few years I want to!

What do you guys think for something like that?
 
T

tjh566

New Member
May 22, 2004
608
0
0
Northern Va
Apr 5, 2007
#14
  • Apr 5, 2007
  • #14
Oh, I too took WHP, as meaning "wheel horsepower" as in the wheels on the car, I guess it really means flywheel.
 
R

Rock777

Member
Aug 22, 2004
195
1
16
Troy, IL
Apr 5, 2007
#15
  • Apr 5, 2007
  • #15
95.0Stang said:
I want a clutch with the lightest pedal, but with the most holding power.
What do you guys think for something like that?
Click to expand...

In my experience, this is exactly what the Centerforce is best at. Sure there are clutches that will hold more power, but the CF drives closest to stock and is not near as hard on your tranny, yet will still hold up very well. Just my 2 cents though.
 

Joe 5.0

Founding Member
Feb 1, 2002
1,184
2
38
Macomb, MI (metro detroit)
Apr 5, 2007
#16
  • Apr 5, 2007
  • #16
I have a McLeod street twin in mine, and its great. It def has alot higher pedal effort than stock, but it grips nice and strong with no chatter, and it can be slipped when driving at slow speeds.
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Apr 6, 2007
#17
  • Apr 6, 2007
  • #17
Low-5.0 said:
I went with a custom clutch from Pro Motion and I love it. The SPEC stage 2 is great, but I wouldn't recommend it with 500+HP. Unless you're running a weak trans, then the stage 2 might keep you from breaking something.
Click to expand...

 

SQUEEZE&STROKE

New Member
Jun 24, 2005
0
0
0
SOUTHERN CA
Apr 6, 2007
#18
  • Apr 6, 2007
  • #18
Centerforce Dual friction here, used from 300-500 FWHP, no complaints. That fugger lasted a LONG time too!
 

94Cobra69SS396

Member
Dec 27, 2004
44
0
7
Fontana, CA
Apr 6, 2007
#19
  • Apr 6, 2007
  • #19
I have the Centerforce Dual Friction in mine. The pedal feel is the same as stock. When I first installed it the feel was a little springy but after about 500 miles that went away. However it does slip if I power shift when running my slicks at the track and I'm only making 433rwhp.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Apr 7, 2007
#20
  • Apr 7, 2007
  • #20
How about this one? http://www.latemodelrestoration.com/iwwida.pvx?;item?item_no=M7560C302 1&comp=LRS
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SOLD For Sale '92 LX Street/Drag car - WV
  • MikeyMustang
  • Apr 12, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Dec 31, 2025
MikeyMustang
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
590
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?