• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Any opinions on clutch to handle 500WHP?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pokageek
  • Start date Start date Apr 5, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

go-stang5.0

New Member
Jan 27, 2003
2,244
0
0
42
Glenview,Il
Apr 7, 2007
#21
  • Apr 7, 2007
  • #21
I been running a spec stage 2 for 4 yrs now. I just changed the clutch disc when I did the g-force tranny (but the tob and pressure plate are the same). Holding fine and the trannys good too. However the clutch pedal is heavy and stop and go can be annoying...but when moving most of my shifts are clutchless so it doesnt bother me. I dont really dragrace the car but it does get open tracked several times a year...as finances allow. So thats the extent of the stresses on the stuff.
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
Apr 7, 2007
#22
  • Apr 7, 2007
  • #22
i'll be the first to say it.

I HATE SPEC CLUTCHES.

they break alot, have outrageous pedal effort, way too grabby, cust service is ****. i know there are alot of guys on here that feel the same.

i do like my king cobra, but my next clutch will be a custom job through a place here in town.
 

Therian

The Highlander
Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
0
1
0
Waterloo, Ontario
Apr 7, 2007
#23
  • Apr 7, 2007
  • #23
tjh566 said:
Oh, I too took WHP, as meaning "wheel horsepower" as in the wheels on the car, I guess it really means flywheel.
Click to expand...

I typically see FWHP as "front wheel horse power", as it is the logical parallel to RWHP.

flywheel horsepower should be referred to as BHP (brake horse power)
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Apr 28, 2007
#24
  • Apr 28, 2007
  • #24
So "Centerforce Dual Friction " is the one to go with for my BHP (500) level and rives with ease of stock clutch?
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Apr 28, 2007
#25
  • Apr 28, 2007
  • #25
The clutch pedal is soft for sure, as soft as stock to me...

Centerforce is a great product in the general clutch aftermarket.

You can 'ride' the clutch out too...
 

go-stang5.0

New Member
Jan 27, 2003
2,244
0
0
42
Glenview,Il
Apr 29, 2007
#26
  • Apr 29, 2007
  • #26
I have seen pressure plates with weights on the springs so that as rpms go up, clamping force increases. That was you have a light pedal at low rpms, but you still have goodholding power up high where you make the hp. Does anyone make such a pressure plate for our cars?
 
R

Rock777

Member
Aug 22, 2004
195
1
16
Troy, IL
Apr 29, 2007
#27
  • Apr 29, 2007
  • #27
go-stang5.0 said:
I have seen pressure plates with weights on the springs so that as rpms go up, clamping force increases. That was you have a light pedal at low rpms, but you still have goodholding power up high where you make the hp. Does anyone make such a pressure plate for our cars?
Click to expand...

This is how the Centerforce Dual Friction is designed, very nice clutch in my opinion.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Apr 29, 2007
#28
  • Apr 29, 2007
  • #28
That is how Centerforce in general is designed, whether it be gold class, stage II, Dual Friction or the DFX series...

That is where they get there name
 
R

Rock777

Member
Aug 22, 2004
195
1
16
Troy, IL
Apr 29, 2007
#29
  • Apr 29, 2007
  • #29
5spd GT said:
That is how Centerforce in general is designed, whether it be gold class, stage II, Dual Friction or the DFX series...

That is where they get there name
Click to expand...

Correct, but given the original topic and go-stang5.0's comment of "but you still have goodholding power up high where you make the hp," I didn't want to mention anything less than the Dual Friction, might throw some people off.
 
F

fiveohh94gt

New Member
Dec 26, 2003
277
0
0
40
Apr 29, 2007
#30
  • Apr 29, 2007
  • #30
+1 for the centerforce dual-friction, i also had a zoom dual-friction before the centerforce and was pretty happy with it also
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Apr 29, 2007
#31
  • Apr 29, 2007
  • #31
Rock777 said:
Correct, but given the original topic and go-stang5.0's comment of "but you still have goodholding power up high where you make the hp," I didn't want to mention anything less than the Dual Friction, might throw some people off.
Click to expand...

but not Pokageek...
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Apr 29, 2007
#32
  • Apr 29, 2007
  • #32
Thanks alot guys!! Looks like cdf it is!!
 

go-stang5.0

New Member
Jan 27, 2003
2,244
0
0
42
Glenview,Il
Apr 30, 2007
#33
  • Apr 30, 2007
  • #33
Yea centerforce....now its kinda obvious to me. On a side note, those weights add rotating mass to the pressure plate. Which can be looked at as a bad thing by people like me who dont care about hole shot. I wonder how much mass those weights actually add to the pp. And also what the CF pp weighs compared to other PP's.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Apr 30, 2007
#34
  • Apr 30, 2007
  • #34
I say a few ounces...they are 'loose' somewhat on the wire that holds them. They don't feel heavy at all...
 

KBCobra95

New Member
Aug 28, 2005
356
0
0
North Carolina
May 1, 2007
#35
  • May 1, 2007
  • #35
I have a pro motion custom clutch. It is supposed to handle around 550 whp. The man told me it is the hradest grapping clutch he would "trust" in front of the stock T-5
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SOLD For Sale '92 LX Street/Drag car - WV
  • MikeyMustang
  • Apr 12, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Dec 31, 2025
MikeyMustang
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
599
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?