• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

anyone ever hear of 160# injectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter dragnazz5.0
  • Start date Start date Dec 4, 2006

dragnazz5.0

My "0" key d0esn't w0rk, s0 I have t0 use the zer0
Nov 19, 2005
815
5
18
mooresville, nc
Dec 4, 2006
#1
  • Dec 4, 2006
  • #1
well this kid in class claims his friend is running 160# injectors on his turbo 331 mustang. i have seen the car and its nice and had a moster turbo on it with all the goodies but i find it hard to beleive that he would need injectors that big and ive never even heard of injectors that big. hes making just over 600 at the wheels on pump gas and 8 psi i think but this weekend he was gonna bump it to 14-15 psi and was hoping for close to 900 at the wheels. but yet again i still dont think he would need 160 lb injectors. i have a good friend that has a 306 with a blower making 26 psi and he runs 96# injectors and makes 750 at the wheels.

ps. its the same kid who claims top fuel is gonna start running turbos. im about to just shut this kid down next time he opens his mouth.

move this to talk if you want....i didnt realize i was in tech
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Dec 4, 2006
#2
  • Dec 4, 2006
  • #2
They do have injectors that big, usually found on much larger combos then 600RWHP however.

You can find them at www.fuelsystems.biz
 

JBeezy53

Member
Dec 28, 2003
559
1
19
Sacramento, Ca
Dec 4, 2006
#3
  • Dec 4, 2006
  • #3
I've seen them on huge race motors. I pretty sure though that those motors were well over 1000 hp.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Dec 4, 2006
#4
  • Dec 4, 2006
  • #4
According to the handy dandy carfor calculator, 900 flywheel HP would be happy wtih 66 lb injectors.

See http://users.erols.com/srweiss/ to get your own or use the online calculators.
 

dragnazz5.0

My "0" key d0esn't w0rk, s0 I have t0 use the zer0
Nov 19, 2005
815
5
18
mooresville, nc
Dec 4, 2006
#5
  • Dec 4, 2006
  • #5
alright....i figured that guy was full of it or his buddy just doesnt know what hes doing.
 

onefstsnake

New Member
Nov 25, 2005
792
1
0
Northern VA
Dec 4, 2006
#6
  • Dec 4, 2006
  • #6
technicaly you could run a 160# injector on that car. The duty cycle would be like 5% though...
 

sgarlic

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2001
3,085
1
56
Dec 5, 2006
#7
  • Dec 5, 2006
  • #7
Summit sells 150# injectors in the Mustang section for the same price as all the rest. Yup, they exist.
 
U

uedlose

Founding Member
Jan 24, 2001
635
0
17
Charles Town WV.
Dec 5, 2006
#8
  • Dec 5, 2006
  • #8
Sure do got a set for myself Now if I just finish the car
 
T

tylerrocks

New Member
Oct 13, 2005
514
0
0
Big Spring, TX
Dec 5, 2006
#9
  • Dec 5, 2006
  • #9
I may be mistaken but I think there are two ways to rate injectors. I remember my dad was getting injectors for his 280zx and they wern't rated in lbs, I cant remember what they were rated in but I do remember the numbers were big. I'll see if I can find out.
 
9

95_5.0_stang

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
172
0
0
Lansing, MI.
Dec 5, 2006
#10
  • Dec 5, 2006
  • #10
tylerrocks said:
I may be mistaken but I think there are two ways to rate injectors. I remember my dad was getting injectors for his 280zx and they wern't rated in lbs, I cant remember what they were rated in but I do remember the numbers were big. I'll see if I can find out.
Click to expand...

cc's?
 

bubba-dough

Active Member
Dec 28, 2004
1,044
2
38
Indiana
Dec 5, 2006
#11
  • Dec 5, 2006
  • #11
95_5.0_stang said:
cc's?
Click to expand...

Or maybe grams or something metric (since the whole world but the US uses the metric system )
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,103
2,710
224
Vass, NC
Dec 5, 2006
#12
  • Dec 5, 2006
  • #12
Yes, that's very plausible. 160# injectors would work great in a 331 with a big turbo, and it is a big one if he's making 600rwhp with only 8psi. It's probably an 88mm. The reason they're necessary is that if he maxes that turbo out, he's going to be looking at making around 1400hp. 1100-1200 maxed if he's running an aggressive 76mm. Sounds like your friend's friend has a high dollar setup, and with any of the newer sequential fire stand-alone engine management systems (not sure about batch fire systems) they can actually be made to idle very well.

Chris
 

Blk91stang

Member
Jan 3, 2003
607
0
16
North Brunswick, NJ
Dec 5, 2006
#13
  • Dec 5, 2006
  • #13
FastDriver said:
and it is a big one if he's making 600rwhp with only 8psi. It's probably an 88mm
Click to expand...

Not to start a debate but I would assume 8psi from a smaller turbo working in that efficiency range would yield MORE HP than a big turbo at 8psi since its not operating in it's efficieny range.

8psi is 8psi whether its being made from a big or small turbo. The efficiency ranges are what makes the difference. Hence, there is no reason to assume it is a big turbo just because of the hp it is making at such a low psi.
 

FastDriver

I was uncomfortably high & wearing a helmet
SN Certified Technician
Sep 5, 2001
6,103
2,710
224
Vass, NC
Dec 5, 2006
#14
  • Dec 5, 2006
  • #14
You know, you're absolutely right. I've seen some questionable statements from people about particular outputs on the same motor from differing turbos. They talk about "how much air a turbo is moving" based on its size. Really, though, it doesn't matter how much air it wants to move, at a given pressure the engine is going to draw, I should think, a proportional volume of air.

I retract that bit of failed logic. I'd say rather that I believe the guy probably has little to no chance of making 900 rwhp at 14-15 psi unless we're talking about a solid-roller high revver, which is extremely unlikely unless it's a track only car. The theoretical volume of air that the engine draws will only double at that pressure and therefore the engine would have to be capable of 450 rwhp assuming (though impossible) that the turbo is operating at 100% efficiency. You'd need a high revving race-intended 331 to make those kind of numbers.

Chris
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
New daily driver help needed.....not a mustang but mustang drivetrain.
  • Wayne Waldrep
  • Jun 17, 2024
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
80
Views
6K
Other Auto Tech Jul 28, 2024
manicmechanic007
Engine 347 Supercharge Planning
  • HeatShield
  • Oct 17, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 27, 2021
Haste347
H
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?