• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

anyone own a 4x4 ranger?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bad92GT
  • Start date Start date Nov 14, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

Bad92GT

The 5 Minute Plan Man
Jun 10, 2004
492
0
0
SC
Nov 14, 2006
#1
  • Nov 14, 2006
  • #1
i'm selling the Z to buy one.. working in the junkyard and having to borrow a junk car to drive around is a pita.. so im just going to pick up a 4x4 truck so i can just drive off without having to pull my tools out one car and chunk em in another.. how do these trucks do? they hold up to anything? i'll throw on a lift kit and all to boot.. redneck er up anyone got one?
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
Connecticut
Nov 14, 2006
#2
  • Nov 14, 2006
  • #2
They're kinda cute. Not a bad girl's truck. I like S10s better though.
 
R

rigamaroles

New Member
Jun 27, 2005
0
0
0
British Columbia
Nov 14, 2006
#3
  • Nov 14, 2006
  • #3
A 4x4 Ranger is the next vehicle I'm going to buy...I wouldnt buy an S10 or Sonoma, myself.
 

5.0 con-vert

No soup for you, Joe Rogan!!!
Jun 7, 2005
244
4
39
Boca Raton, FL
Nov 14, 2006
#4
  • Nov 14, 2006
  • #4
DANGER RANGER FTW!!!
 

90_Red_LX

Member
Sep 29, 2003
668
5
19
Asheboro, NC
Nov 14, 2006
#5
  • Nov 14, 2006
  • #5
A ranger or a s10/sonoma is a good choice. I've heard many stories of the rangers holding up good, and the 4 banger sonoma is as reliable as a rock too. My cousins has 215k on it, went through 2 16 year old drivers, never had a set of plugs put on it until around 200k, the injectors leak pretty good, factory clutch, and it still knocks 25mpg down. The only problems it had was the A/C and the original fuel pump knocked off a few weeks ago.
 
I

ike34

Member
Jan 16, 2004
156
12
19
Waterloo, IA
Nov 14, 2006
#6
  • Nov 14, 2006
  • #6
I have a 2000 xlt 2wd and I have had it for 3 years and have had nothing go wrong with it.
 

Matt's 03 GT

Member
Aug 28, 2006
0
0
17
Orange County
Nov 14, 2006
#7
  • Nov 14, 2006
  • #7
Rangers are the best car's my family has ever had.

I am going on 70,000 miles with my 2001, 2.5 liter I-4 5 speed and have yet to have any major problems. I have only done a front brake job, IAC, Plugs and the PCV valve beyond the typical oil changes. It runs as good today as it did new. I paid $9,700 for this truck new and it blue book's at about $7,000 now

My brother had a 1999 4x4 with the 4.0 V6 automatic. He lifted it 6" and had 33" swampers on it. The only problem he had was a new tranny and seals in the motor at about 100,000 miles. He sold it 3 years ago with about 175,000 miles on it. The guy that bought it from him just sold it with about 260,000 miles and had no major problems. He still sold it for about $5,000.

Long story short, I think they are great little trucks that can take a beeting if you take care of them and as a benefit they seem to hold their value!!!

Matt
 

88gt

Founding Member
Aug 2, 1999
794
0
0
Drillers cabin
Nov 14, 2006
#8
  • Nov 14, 2006
  • #8
Get one that has the 4.0L engine....mine has the 3.0L AND IT IS POS...

If you are going to be on flat roads..the 3.0L may do you just fine. Other than that...good truck for hauling the kids baseball gear around.
 

Henceforward

The Avatar Master
Founding Member
Jul 17, 2001
485
0
0
Nov 14, 2006
#9
  • Nov 14, 2006
  • #9
blackened88lx said:
They're kinda cute. Not a bad girl's truck.
Click to expand...



Le Sad...

I love my Ranger, carry the canoe, go camping, carry two MTBs correctly, load up the YZ, and throw the dog in the back no sweat.

The 3.0 has no HP and even less torqque, but it does the job, and it's a 5-speed to boot!
 

Matt's 03 GT

Member
Aug 28, 2006
0
0
17
Orange County
Nov 14, 2006
#10
  • Nov 14, 2006
  • #10
88gt said:
Get one that has the 4.0L engine....mine has the 3.0L AND IT IS POS...

If you are going to be on flat roads..the 3.0L may do you just fine. Other than that...good truck for hauling the kids baseball gear around.
Click to expand...

Stay far far away from the 3.0. My 2.5 I-4 has about 5 less HP and gets about double the mileage. I bought my truck and at the same time a friend bought a very similar truck with the 3.0. We raced and I was able to keep up till about 50mph. The point being either get the indistructable 4.0 or the indistructable 2.5.

Matt
 

Henceforward

The Avatar Master
Founding Member
Jul 17, 2001
485
0
0
Nov 14, 2006
#11
  • Nov 14, 2006
  • #11
To defend the Vulcan just a bit if, and this means "if" you throw a Whipple blower on it it can be a blast...

Some guy on here had a whipple kit on his Ranger that he swore could smoke his Mustang.

Throw Dual Cam SHO heads on there, and you are set to go.
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Nov 14, 2006
#12
  • Nov 14, 2006
  • #12
My brother has a 94 4x4 with the 4.0 and a 5-speed. Truck is actually very fast and averages high teens low 20 with mostly highway driving. He bought it for cheap and had to replace a few things, but so far so good.
 

StangerT

New Member
Jan 21, 2004
9
0
1
Meridian, ID
Nov 14, 2006
#13
  • Nov 14, 2006
  • #13
I have a 2001 Ford Ranger 4 X 4 offroad supercab with the POS 3.0 and have not had one problem with it ever... I love my truck
 

sunil6784

Member
Mar 31, 2005
620
0
18
Boston, MA
Nov 14, 2006
#14
  • Nov 14, 2006
  • #14
I have a 96 4.0 4x4 super cab. 63,000 miles. I love the truck. Gets around 20 mpgs. Quiet comfortable ride. I have had some problems...nothign too major though. Had a fuel filler neck hose crack, so I picked up a junkyard one for 20 bucks. Also had a hub go bad. And it popped a brake line, lol. Other than that though. it's running like a champ now though. I love the truck. Actually like working on it almost as much as the mustang.
 

myslo50

Member
Jun 12, 2006
247
3
18
ohio
Nov 14, 2006
#15
  • Nov 14, 2006
  • #15
i have a 99 ranger 3.0 4x4 ex-cab with 31.5 inch tiresand an 1.5 inch lift. i wsh i would have got a 4.0 liter but i needed a truck at the time and i bought it. there good trucks, u throw anything at it and it takes it like a champ...also mine comes with 4.10 gears from the factory..if it had a 4.0 i wouldnt be worried about tring to sell it. best mpg i got with it was 17.1 city/hwy.
 

Bad92GT

The 5 Minute Plan Man
Jun 10, 2004
492
0
0
SC
Nov 14, 2006
#16
  • Nov 14, 2006
  • #16
well im trying to get one like i said.. and it aint a damn girls truck.. lol.. girls truck is a white blinged out one.. if yall know of one.. lemme know PM please.. not on the thread damnit
 

mustangjoe87

Member
Jul 23, 2004
364
0
16
Harrison Twp., Michigan
Nov 14, 2006
#17
  • Nov 14, 2006
  • #17
I have a 99 Mazda B-2500 damn good truck, I have 123,000 on it still kicking like its new. I get between 24-29 mpg depending on the city highway mix. only thing that I will need to do in the future is fix a small exhaust leak. But look at mazda pick ups while your at it sometimes they are cheaper than rangers even though they are identical.
 

grey5.0beast

Cookies should never be DUNKED!!!
Aug 3, 2004
0
1
0
atl ga
Nov 14, 2006
#18
  • Nov 14, 2006
  • #18
The 4x4 ones are actually QUITE good off road. 2 of my buddys that I go muddin with have em, they are real light and can get through mud like noones business, they don't have much time to sink, being as light as they are. They both have 4.0s, great reliable trucks!!
 

88_GT_5_oh

Sportin' a turbo 5.0 in Canadistan
Jul 4, 2004
1
0
1
WPG/MB/CA
Nov 14, 2006
#19
  • Nov 14, 2006
  • #19
i have a 2000 ranger 4x4 offroad, with the 4.0. it gets pretty decent gas milage in the city and highway. like most people have said they are pretty damn good off road, i have taken mine off road at the lake going into lakes that have no cabins and no real land access to them (great fishing!) all the roads are old logging trails that are really rough and some swampy parts and my ranger did awsome through that. i have also taken it off roading abit just outside the city for fun.

i was torn between a ranger and an F150 and i am glad i chose the ranger, i don't need full size truck right now

heres mine
 

Attachments

  • angle.webp
    39 KB · Views: 96

z2o_what

Member
Mar 31, 2005
309
1
19
princeton, WV
Nov 15, 2006
#20
  • Nov 15, 2006
  • #20
-i would try to get a '90-'97 4x4 with a 4.0, (2.9s last forever but they tend to be week on the highway and heads may crack)
-the pre-'98 have TTB and are cheaper to lift (if thats your thing) than IFS
-90+ have the dana 35 front axle instead of the dana 28.

i had a '89 4x4 (traded to my dad) and still have a '91 4x4(4"skyjacker lift, 3" body lift, 32" tires).

both have over 200k on stock 2.9s. my dad still drives the '89

but due to the gasket leaking around the shifter(5spd), i burnt up the tranny in the '91, while 4wheeling, so its getting a 5.0.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
731
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
565
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Thursday at 9:44 PM
Noobz347
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?