• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Anyone running these adjustable motor mounts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ga289stocker
  • Start date Start date Nov 5, 2007

ga289stocker

Member
May 23, 2006
238
0
16
Sugar Hill, Ga
Nov 5, 2007
#1
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #1
This look pretty nice, just curious how they perform. They claim a 1/2" drop from
stock height, side to side and front to rear adjustment. Anyone got any experience w/ them? Also I'd be concerned w/ the front to rear movement under hard lauches at the track, looks like there are 2 bolts to secure that movment per side..

http://www.ronmorrisperformance.com/miva/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=rmp&Product_Code=6110
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Nov 5, 2007
#2
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #2
I have never used these mounts but I have seen them before. I wasn't comfortable with how they adjust. I suppose if I needed to adjust my engine position, I would use these but I think I would put a little weld down on these once I got them right where I wanted them just to be sure they wouldn't move. I suppose the trans cross member would help to keep the thing located front to rear but I'd still want the extra piece of mind afforded by the additional welding.

TCP makes a set very similar to these except they are not adjustable.

I own a pair of TCP mounts and they are EASY to install. They also hold the motor quite firmly in place.
 

65fastbackresto

Active Member
Apr 13, 2007
1,229
7
39
AR
Nov 5, 2007
#3
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #3
I`ve got the Ron Morris adjustables

they are SWEET man. I haven`t noticed any movement, but I`m not using mine on a track or anything. They are nice peices though, good steel. I do have a pretty hot motor, if anything really obvious was moving around up there I`d know I think.

Wouldn`t the tranny crossmember keep it from moving back and forth? Other then a little flexing how far could it really go? I would also think the torque of the motor would keep it from moving, its hard to push something backward thats also trying to twist at the same time (in a bind, so to speak)

They sure do make header clearance easy.

I might add for me this was also a cheaper route then going back stock parts.
 
T

truck90278

New Member
Jun 4, 2006
382
1
0
Redondo Beach, CA
Nov 5, 2007
#4
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #4
We're using them and they work great, no problems with them
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Nov 5, 2007
#5
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #5
I can't help but wonder if dropping a half inch would hit the sway bar in some conditions: my oil pan is REALLY close already. ??
 

86T-Top

Founding Member
Jun 29, 2001
553
0
17
Dublin, PA
Nov 5, 2007
#6
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #6
I have them on my 68, and I love them. With the stock mounts the engine sat too high and the transmission hit the trans tunnel. So my options where to either install 1965 motor mounts (and still possibly have an issue) or install the RM mounts (which cost less money then sourcing all the parts needed for 1965 mounts). I installed the Ron Morris mounts and it lower the entire setup to my desired height. The ability to move the engine back was also key when installing my electric fan. Also these mounts where increadibly easy to install, and I have no clearance issues with my sway bar, which is 1" in diameter.

Mario
 

enferno

Member
Jun 20, 2006
418
2
16
Nov 5, 2007
#7
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #7
mustangdave said:
I can't help but wonder if dropping a half inch would hit the sway bar in some conditions: my oil pan is REALLY close already. ??
Click to expand...

or the crossmember.

i changed from the late (or early style motor mounts that are 1/2 inch or so taller) motor mounts to the early ones (or late, i don't remember off the top of my head) my oil pan hit the cross member. i had to get some washers and use them as spacers, then some longer bolts to get it to clear.
 
B

BornInAFord

Member
Apr 22, 2005
199
0
17
Bend, OR 97701
Nov 5, 2007
#8
  • Nov 5, 2007
  • #8
I have the stock height RM ones (the lowered ones weren't offered when I bought mine) and really like mine. The adjustability was a nice feature as I moved the engine over about 1/2" and back maybe the same amount. No hitting of engine crossmember (although now I have a Delta Bay road race one instead of the stock one) or of the sway bar. I have noticed no shifting, although I do feel more engine vibration at idle than I did with the stock steel/rubber mounts.
Daniel
 

ga289stocker

Member
May 23, 2006
238
0
16
Sugar Hill, Ga
Nov 6, 2007
#9
  • Nov 6, 2007
  • #9
Thanks for the information on these. Seem like they are a nice piece then for you guys that have them. I'll have to pick some up when I pull the motor hopefully in the next few months....
 

jerry S

New Member
Sep 3, 2003
1,365
1
0
52.22N 5.12E
Nov 6, 2007
#10
  • Nov 6, 2007
  • #10
Rusty67 said:
TCP makes a set very similar to these except they are not adjustable.
Click to expand...

Not entirely true. they can adjust back and forth, just not up or down.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Brakes 1979-1986 Fox Parking Brake Adjustment
  • LiquidStangs
  • Sep 22, 2019
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
9K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 23, 2019
LX Dave
Fox Kandi: she's cheap, fun, & has a loose top - sold!
  • FastDriver
  • Apr 20, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
112
Views
20K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 27, 2019
2000xp8
A
  • Locked
Expired 95 Mustang Project- Roller Motor/trans & More
  • Adrenalin
  • Jun 20, 2013
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
0
Views
28K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Jun 20, 2013
Adrenalin
A
Ron Morris adjustable motor mounts
  • shoguun
  • Sep 30, 2009
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
13K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Dec 23, 2009
mustangman1974
M
2013 Ford Mustang Boss 302 (#2895)
  • Gloff Ford
  • Jan 8, 2013
  • Special Production
Replies
1
Views
2K
Special Production Jan 8, 2013
Gloff Ford
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?