• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Anyone use pacesetter headers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Venom_Nitrous
  • Start date Start date Oct 21, 2005

Venom_Nitrous

Founding Member
Aug 23, 2002
416
1
0
Spearfish, SD
Oct 21, 2005
#1
  • Oct 21, 2005
  • #1
Are they any good. The price is right, @ around $525. I didn't even know these existed. I wonder what a full pacesetter exhaust sounds like. Does anyone know? They make ceramic headers, matching x pipe and a catback. I don't think anyone else on here uses that setup. My tips on the magna flow kit got smashed. Do you like these (see bottom picture).
\Headers


catback
View attachment 499890

X pipe

Tips


I like these tips.
 

Attachments

  • 72c3230.webp
    14.4 KB · Views: 148
  • monza_slash.webp
    8.8 KB · Views: 142

mity2

I like Pro3 and all I got was this crappy CT.
Jul 24, 2003
2,872
3
48
StateCollege PA
Oct 21, 2005
#2
  • Oct 21, 2005
  • #2
For $525, u can get BBK coated header...
I think Pacesetter are more populer with F-body. I would stick with prooven one, as its alot of work to install them. U don't was to do it again.

And their tips, don't even get me strated on that
 

helty

some Ukrainian's enjoying a handjob via my credit
Mar 30, 2005
1,461
1
39
Baltimore, MD
Oct 21, 2005
#3
  • Oct 21, 2005
  • #3
headers look nice but ive never heard of anyone using them. you could be stangnets experimental monkey and try them out, then give us the results.

im with mity on the tips. they look like polished stock tips with a sticker on them.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Oct 21, 2005
#4
  • Oct 21, 2005
  • #4
Pace Setter exhaust systems have been around for a while now….since the old 5.0L days. As Mity2 stated, they aren't as popular with the Blue Oval crowd as they have been with the Bow Tie crowd in the past......but then again, neither was SLP until recently. Give them a try, what have you got to lose. They'll perform as well as any other brand.
 

jasonh_86

I
May 20, 2005
1,156
2
48
Arkansas
Oct 21, 2005
#5
  • Oct 21, 2005
  • #5
Like Helty said, you could be the stangnet experimental monkey and let us know how they turned out.. i'd try it, if i had the extra $$
 

streetstang03

unModerator
Dec 27, 2003
0
1
0
the dark side of the moon/home of the 1999, 2003,
Oct 22, 2005
#6
  • Oct 22, 2005
  • #6
what the hell, be different. skip those tips though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
1986 Convertable 5.0 GT
  • eneerg
  • Sep 24, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
4
Views
214
The Welcome Wagon Sep 24, 2025
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
658
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
Engine on3 Conversion to draw through MAF?
  • sav22rem22
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
248
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 11, 2025
sav22rem22
G
1982 Mustang GL 5.0 single to dual exhaust conversion
  • Guyton
  • Jun 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
569
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 1, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?