• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

AOD/Headers - Sanity check

  • Thread starter Thread starter u0061914
  • Start date Start date Mar 4, 2010
U

u0061914

New Member
Aug 20, 2009
54
0
0
Prior Lake, MN
Mar 4, 2010
#1
  • Mar 4, 2010
  • #1
I have spent hours reading all the posts out here and other sites regarding header choices. In most cases, it is fairly clear what works and what does not work. In my case, I did a 6cyl to v8 conversion in a 67. In addition to the 302, I converted to an AOD. From what I can gather, if I use a long tube header, like a Tri-Y style, I'm going possibly end up cutting off the collectors and rewelding due to the AOD width. I'm really not interested in doing that if I can help it. So... I'm thinking just a shorty header. I'm honestly not concerned about the couple of HP gain by long tubes. I'm building this car for my wife anyway.

Can a few of you AOD conversion guys jump in amd give me some guidance?
I would like to order a set in the next day or two.

I should mention, that I have manual steering for the time being, but
eventually will swap to PS.

Thanks,

Mike
 

JonK

Member
Jun 6, 2007
276
0
16
Nashville (Smyrna), TN
Mar 4, 2010
#2
  • Mar 4, 2010
  • #2
As far as I've read one of the other main issues with long tube and PS is it hitting the power cylinder and requiring the addition of a drop bracket, going shorties should avoid that extra issue also. Sorry I can't comment on shorty brands with AOD as I'm going long tube MAC and adjusting as I need, the MAC's don't require a drop bracket but I may still need to mod them to clear AOD as mentioned, we'll see.
Jon
 

coupe5.0

Founding Member
Oct 31, 2000
117
0
16
Mar 4, 2010
#3
  • Mar 4, 2010
  • #3
Shorties on mine.
 

Blue1965

New Member
Nov 10, 2009
14
0
0
Idaho
Mar 5, 2010
#4
  • Mar 5, 2010
  • #4
We used JBA mid lengths on my dads 66 when we did the AOD swap. I was really impressed with the quality and fit of these but they are a little spendy.
 

tx65coupe

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
1,551
1
37
Mar 5, 2010
#5
  • Mar 5, 2010
  • #5
I have the JBA mid lengths as well. I think they are great. They fit very well and the construction is good. They have thicker flangers and tubing than most also. Those should work just fine for you.
 
U

u0061914

New Member
Aug 20, 2009
54
0
0
Prior Lake, MN
Mar 5, 2010
#6
  • Mar 5, 2010
  • #6
Wow, the JBAs are not exactly cheap. Anyone use the Partiot mid-length?

Patriot Exhaust H8433-1 - Patriot Clippster Headers - Overview - SummitRacing.com

nearly 1/2 the price
 

jlangholzj

Mustang Master
Oct 23, 2006
248
31
93
MI
Mar 6, 2010
#7
  • Mar 6, 2010
  • #7
the mid length clippsters are what I have on mine....nice fit...and as an added bonus the pipes are pinched just a bit around the bolts so you dont have to fight the damn things so much going in.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Mar 6, 2010
#8
  • Mar 6, 2010
  • #8
Try and look for headers listed for an FMX car. The AOD was based on the FMX, both were wider in the pan area.
 

Tim65GT

Active Member
Feb 24, 2004
1,149
2
39
West Texas
Mar 7, 2010
#9
  • Mar 7, 2010
  • #9
I have th Hedman Shorty Elite headers with my AOD. I don't have Power Steering, but they shouldn't be an issue.
 

tx65coupe

Active Member
Nov 29, 1999
1,551
1
37
Mar 7, 2010
#10
  • Mar 7, 2010
  • #10
I know the JBA's cost more, but over the years with all my friend's projects and all the dealings with cheap headers, I did not want to get the cheap ones. I like the fact that they heavier material, stainless, and have a lifetime warranty. If you do get them, don't fool with the JBA prefab H pipe. I had it and it doesn't fit very well.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Mar 7, 2010
#11
  • Mar 7, 2010
  • #11
Another spendy option is FPA headers. Good heavy quality stuff, but not cheap.
 
O

ohyaa

Member
May 27, 2004
42
0
6
Henderson, NV
Mar 11, 2010
#12
  • Mar 11, 2010
  • #12
A second for the Hedman Elites. I just completed my AOD swap and they clear fine. I did have to get the pipes relocated a bit to clear the extra width of the trans though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
570
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
330
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
Intended Headers and Trans, questions about fitment
  • from6to8
  • Aug 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 6, 2025
from6to8
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?