• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Are Iron Heads Really That Bad?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DFG 5OH
  • Start date Start date Oct 10, 2005

DFG 5OH

Active Member
Aug 28, 2004
1,341
0
36
Louisville, KY
Oct 10, 2005
#1
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #1
I was chatting with a few guys from a local car club, and I asked where I could get Iron heads ported. They acted like i was the stupidest person ever for even asking that. They said it was a waste, and i couldnt make more than 240 at the wheels with irons, and i should just get alumn. heads. I tried to explain how GT-40 heads were good heads, and ported could be even better, and compared to the price of Alumn's are also quite a bit cheaper. They still wouldnt budge from there stand. I just stopped arguing, because i was going nowhere.

So if iron heads are so bad, how come so many people on here run them, and get great results for the money?
 

hotrodnut

Member
Jul 12, 2004
672
0
17
North Florida
Oct 10, 2005
#2
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #2
Iron heads are actually better than aluminum for retaining their form and shape and are more stable in different heat variances, the big advantange that aluminum has and is very hard to beat with the HP is weight.
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Oct 10, 2005
#3
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #3
There is nothing wrong with iron heads. Before the aluminum boom there were plenty of people going fast with irons. The problem with irons is there are only a few castings available that are decent. Then the extra money for porting, valves or whatever and now your in aluminum money territory.
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Oct 10, 2005
#4
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #4
Never talk to someone with money about doing anything on a budget. They just think you're a dumbass and not worth talking to. Iron heads are great.

As Vib said, just not many options for us. If they made iron AFR's I'd be all over those like a fat kid on cake. The wieght difference alone is nowhere near justifying the cost if you ask me.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Oct 10, 2005
#5
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #5
I made like 231-238 rwhp with unported gt40's with a 30% comp. loss in number 3 cyl. I am sure I would have made over 240 with all cyl. Before the cyl. dropped press. I ran a 13.5 @102 with unported gt40's, tfs1 cam, ported stock lower...not to bad at all.
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Oct 10, 2005
#6
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #6
Iron heads can make more hp/tq then alumin. head of equal/identical characteristics.
 

95CobraMike

Active Member
Apr 12, 2004
1,046
0
36
Lima OH
Oct 10, 2005
#7
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #7
2 disadvantages to gt-40 iron heads...
-weight
-thin deck

i think the guy who had the car before me made 260 hp with just ported heads and a good tune... at the time he didnt know the heads were ported cause he had never had the engine apart, but when i took the heads off, i found the heads ported....after supercharging he made 423 hp with ported iron heads...

BUT the HG have blown a couple times and becuase of the thin deck, the heads have warped and have needed milling which just makes the deck thinner... so i don't know.
i guess with iron heads that have never been milled and a proper tune you wouldnt have any problems and still make some good power...
like i said 260 was with just the ported heads...stock cam...stock intakes and a good tune.
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Oct 10, 2005
#8
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #8
240 to the wheels with iron? LOL

Hopefully Troy Carter will see this....

I believe he made 290+ with a stock shortblock, iron heads, and a stock cam.

A GOOD valve job is worth TONS of power on iron heads....

Joe
 

urban96

bubb rubb says:"woo woooooo"
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2002
3,464
1
69
Syracuse, NY
Oct 10, 2005
#9
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #9
GreenMustangGt made like 275RWHP with his unported gt40p heads/intake and a crane 2031 cam

someone else here is making just over 300RWHP with some worked p's, custom cam and an edel. intake


i want to get mine dyno tuned soon (ported/milled p's, crane cam and cobra intake) and ill let you know what kinda numbers its making
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
San Diego
Oct 10, 2005
#10
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #10
Im pretty sure Greenmustanggt did some home porting work on those GT40s, but damn why did i waste all this money on aluminum heads, i could have made the same power the GT-40s?!?!?!?!
 

slvrbullit302

New Member
Jan 6, 2004
986
1
0
Alabama
Oct 10, 2005
#11
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #11
I made 270 rwhp/290 rwtq with my ported and decked e7's, F cam, and Typhoon intake on my old stock 302, but that had other supporting pieces such as exhaust, tb, maf, pullies, etc.,etc.etc.
 

DFG 5OH

Active Member
Aug 28, 2004
1,341
0
36
Louisville, KY
Oct 10, 2005
#12
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #12
to me its more of a budget, and the fact that its more of a personal accomplishment if i run 12's and have 300rwhp with irons. Its not as easy as bolting on some AFR's. Now i fully understand the advantages of alumn. heads. I see nothng wrong with iron heads. I know they're heavy, but they're cheaper too. I got my heads for el cheapo with a 3-way valve job, new valves and new springs...i'm hoping to make some good power wiht a street heat intake, and custom cam once its all done. Hopefully i can show these guys up.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Oct 10, 2005
#13
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #13
There are two main types of iron heads.

OEM Ford ....... e7's, gt40, etc

After market ... TFS High Port, etc

Most would say the second type produce the most power

Most would say the first type is what everybody usually works with due to their budget or else those peeps would just get a better flowing Aluminum head for more performance.

Keeping the focus on budget oem Ford iron heads ....................................

Most don't make it to the 300rwhp or better mark due to the fact that you just come to a point in time that you don't wanna put any more money in the heads as its not cost effecient.

I been down that road before with self porting, back cutting the valves, and yada, yada, yada, on oem iron Ford heads.

So my answer to you is .....................................

Nothing is wrong with OEM IRON FORD heads ....................

as long as you don't expect the same performance from them you get with better flowing Aluminum heads for a fraction of the cost.

Grady
 

illwood

Member
Apr 3, 2004
636
1
19
Worcester, MA
Oct 10, 2005
#14
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #14
Nothing wrong with iron heads, but to go along with what Grady was saying, heads like the AFR's and Trick Flow CNC are already CNC ported so you don't need to send them out either.

Also with the aluminum CNC ported heads, you *should* be able to wreck a set and put brand new ones on with minimal variance in power.
 

WHITE94COBRA

New Member
Nov 14, 2003
816
0
0
HUNTINGTON BEACH
Oct 10, 2005
#15
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #15
My car with stock heads, cam, 65mm tb, cold air and edel performer, with a tune, exhaust, and colder therm. it put down 265 hp 290 tq. I dont think thats too bad with stock gt40's, I dont believe the previous owner had any work besides headers and intake done.
 

OrangeMustangGt

Founding Member
Mar 7, 2002
1,976
0
36
Cape Cod, MA
Oct 10, 2005
#16
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #16
Nothing wrong with iorns except for the thin deck.(so i hear, i havent blown a HG yet tho)
I made 275rwhp with my explorer motor(Ford stock gt40p heads and a Explorer Intake) and a crane 2031....And i know i would have made more if i had a better intake, people are making 290 rwhp with unported P heads! and a better intake!
 

94gts

Member
Jul 4, 2004
873
0
16
Carmel, New York
Oct 10, 2005
#17
  • Oct 10, 2005
  • #17
I actually just made the decision to keep my iron heads that i currently have. I have iron 351 GT-40's. They are brand new (when i put them on) castings that would have gone on a 5.8 lighting. I am building a 327 sportsman based block this winter with stock cam, the 1.7 rr's i have now, and some undecided intake(not my explorer). The heads will get some nice home porting and no more exhaust humps. If anyone wants to see 600 rwhp and 14 psi stay tuned......
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Oct 11, 2005
#18
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #18
question. does a valve job increase the potential of the heads?
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Oct 11, 2005
#19
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #19
Joes95GT said:
A GOOD valve job is worth TONS of power on iron heads....

Joe
Click to expand...


just noticed this. i will get some numbers within the next few weeks.
 
F

fiveo'cobra

New Member
Oct 7, 2004
241
0
0
SC
Oct 11, 2005
#20
  • Oct 11, 2005
  • #20
Look at my sig. My irons are going to be making upwards of 300whp with the combo i'm running. No question aluminum heads are better and far superior ported, but considering i got my heads with $1000 worth of work AND an E cam, both for $400. I don't think anyone can pass up on a deal like that. I'll be running 11's with these heads and thats faster than alot of aluminum headed cars at the track. ITS ALL IN THE COMBO. Individual parts don't mean much, but they do influence the final outcome.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Tuesday at 3:59 PM
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
148
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Saturday at 8:05 PM
AeroCoupe
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
588
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
T
What's it Worth? 2002 GT conv/auto
  • tonydetesta
  • Jan 7, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
3
Views
635
What is it Worth?!?!? Jan 21, 2026
Mustang5L5
Run a 5 channel or use head unit and mono amp for sub?
  • 2000xp8
  • Sep 20, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 23, 2024
2000xp8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?